From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search

I thought that the internet right could be a new group for us to go refute, but I'll leave this to the mob (ours, not theirs) - is this too risky, ie we might bring the mob (theirs, not ours) here, and would we do wrong by recognising them? I mean, with a little digging, TK found out some info on us (ie the 'dossiers'). What do you think? -- מְתֻרְגְּמָן וִיקִי שְׁלֹום!

I say let 'em try. If they start wandalizing like crazy, I could just mobilize the rest of the vandal gang, and we'd pwn them something fierce. *cracks knuckles*

But seriously, "White survival"? Sound's like Jeb Berkeley's ilk. --transResident Transformers fanform! 21:54, 30 August 2007 (CDT)

I was worrying more about real-life vandalism, possibly perpetrated to the face by cricket bats. Still, as far as I know, the opportunities for trolling the place (if 'Martin Luther King on Wheels' means anything to you, then you know what I'm talking about), anonymously of course, taking pains to hide our identities, could work ... I'm just worried that I could quite easily find out information about several of us on the internet - IPs, and so forth. -- מְתֻרְגְּמָן וִיקִי שְׁלֹום!
Ah, good point. While I'd love being in the newspaper, I'd prefer that it not be in the obits. --transResident Transformers fanform! 23:08, 30 August 2007 (CDT)
What sort of stuff would you do to them? Rangeley 23:06, 30 August 2007 (CDT)
We have our ways ... -- מְתֻרְגְּמָן וִיקִי שְׁלֹום!
Imma chargin mah lazor! --AKjeldsenGodspeed! 02:57, 31 August 2007 (CDT)

Is this user actually saying that he (or she) represents Stormfront? The user page says: 'You think we'd bother to copy their url here for you?' and not "Do you think we'd bother to copy our URL?!" --Bob_M (talk) 05:08, 31 August 2007 (CDT)

I wrote that to sort of say "we'll talk about them, but we aren't going to bother to link to them, since that would require googling them". If it is unclear, please rewrite it. If it is a dumb idea, get rid of it. humanbe in 14:09, 31 August 2007 (CDT)
Sorry, I completely misunderstood what was going on with this one. --Bob_M (talk) 12:41, 1 September 2007 (CDT)
Hmm, then it should be rewritten or removed. A misunderstandable joke is worse than nothing at all. humanbe in 16:11, 1 September 2007 (CDT)

--Bob_M (talk) 12:41, 1 September 2007 (CDT)--Bob_M (talk) 12:41, 1 September 2007 (CDT)

(did I accidentally copy this and put a HR above it?) humanbe in


As the wazzock can't even spell I was going to leave it! Susanpurrrrr ... 17:01, 28 November 2007 (EST)

Hehe, you said wazzock... humanUser talk:Human 20:16, 28 November 2007 (EST)

Daily Stormer[edit]

Maybe it is time to have an article about Stormfront's offshoot, the Daily Stormer "news" site, with it's hilarious headlines? — Unsigned, by: / talk / contribs (signed by bot) 08:40, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

outdated lede?[edit]

"the largest Neo-Nazi and white supremacist message board on the internet" -- debatable, see reddit. change to "largest openly neo-nazi message board"? — Unsigned, by: / talk / contribs

Back Online[edit]

Seems like, after being seized at August 26. it's now back online. Probably should be added to the lead.-- (talk) 07:42, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

Added. ClickerClock (talk) 07:50, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

Stormfront is pissed at us[edit]

They also fell for the April Fool's joke that we were shutting down next month. LuodiWang (talk) 23:06, 3 July 2018 (UTC)