I thought that the internet right could be a new group for us to go refute, but I'll leave this to the mob (ours, not theirs) - is this too risky, ie we might bring the mob (theirs, not ours) here, and would we do wrong by recognising them? I mean, with a little digging, TK found out some info on us (ie the 'dossiers'). What do you think? -- מְתֻרְגְּמָן וִיקִי שְׁלֹום!
- I say let 'em try. If they start wandalizing like crazy, I could just mobilize the rest of the vandal gang, and we'd pwn them something fierce. *cracks knuckles*
- I was worrying more about real-life vandalism, possibly perpetrated to the face by cricket bats. Still, as far as I know, the opportunities for trolling the place (if 'Martin Luther King on Wheels' means anything to you, then you know what I'm talking about), anonymously of course, taking pains to hide our identities, could work ... I'm just worried that I could quite easily find out information about several of us on the internet - IPs, and so forth. -- מְתֻרְגְּמָן וִיקִי שְׁלֹום!
Is this user actually saying that he (or she) represents Stormfront? The user page says: 'You think we'd bother to copy their url here for you?' and not "Do you think we'd bother to copy our URL?!" --Bob_M (talk) 05:08, 31 August 2007 (CDT)
- I wrote that to sort of say "we'll talk about them, but we aren't going to bother to link to them, since that would require googling them". If it is unclear, please rewrite it. If it is a dumb idea, get rid of it. humanbe in 14:09, 31 August 2007 (CDT)
- Hehe, you said wazzock... human 20:16, 28 November 2007 (EST)
Maybe it is time to have an article about Stormfront's offshoot, the Daily Stormer "news" site, with it's hilarious headlines? — Unsigned, by: 18.104.22.168 / talk / contribs (signed by bot) 08:40, 19 October 2014 (UTC)