Talk:Stormfront
Daily Stormer[edit]
Maybe it is time to have an article about Stormfront's offshoot, the Daily Stormer "news" site, with it's hilarious headlines? — Unsigned, by: 84.95.199.210 / talk / contribs (signed by bot) 08:40, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
outdated lede?[edit]
"the largest Neo-Nazi and white supremacist message board on the internet" -- debatable, see reddit. change to "largest openly neo-nazi message board"? — Unsigned, by: 46.5.131.170 / talk / contribs
Back Online[edit]
Seems like, after being seized at August 26. it's now back online. Probably should be added to the lead.--87.123.254.10 (talk) 07:42, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
- Added. ClickerClock (talk) 07:50, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Stormfront is pissed at us[edit]
They also fell for the April Fool's joke that we were shutting down next month. https://www.stormfront.org/forum/t1246026/ LuodiWang (talk) 23:06, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
Meh[edit]
Should the readers of this article honestly give a shit about individual contributors to this webshite? Their postings should be used to summarize the types of crappy content on the site instead of dedicating an entire section to "notable" contributors.
There is also a tendency to document "X posted Y then Z replied with A" in many places in the article. No one gives a shit about any of this. Focus on ideas and not people.
Also, the unpolished and broken stream-of-consciousness style of the english language used in many of these sections reminds me of someone taking quick notes and never making them into real sentences. —cosmikdebris talk stalk 13:29, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- my life is very busy that's why. ←§ Reichtangle (talk) 11:01, 22 May 2024 (UTC)