User talk:LuodiWang
☭Comrade GC☭Ministry of Praise 01:56, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Stop edit warring[edit]
Take it to the talk page. If someone reverts your edits and you contest it, go to the relevant talk page of either the performer or the article itself and ping if you need to. Also, please remember sign your comments by typing four tildes (~) like this: ~~~~; we can't keep doing this for you. --It's-a me, LeftyGreenMario! 21:18, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
Autopatrolled[edit]
You can now bypass the CAPTCHA and sysops don't have to look at ugly exclamation marks next to your edits on Special:RecentChanges. Use your newfound powers well. スプリギーナ (話) (貢献) @ 01:16, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
Alt-Left[edit]
Would it be possible for you to begin writing a new article about the attempt to make alt-right ideology palatable to leftists, using the text you tried to restore to Realist left? Trying to combine that text with the current version of Realist left makes the article inconsistent. RoninMacbeth (talk) 13:46, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
- I'll try to do that. LuodiWang (talk) 14:08, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
- I created a separate article for the "alt facts" version. https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Realist_left_and_alt-right LuodiWang (talk) 14:17, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Plagiarism[edit]
Your entire article on Alexandria Cortes was copied directly from Wikipedia. We don't do that here. Please write your own material. I or someone else will be deleting your article shortly. Chef Moosolini’s Ristorante ItalianoMake a Reservation 17:05, 5 August 2018 (UTC)
Owens article edits.[edit]
You were explicitly told not to play armchair shrink. Yet, this is the fourth time you've done so. Stop or I will get a Mod involved. ☭Comrade GC☭Ministry of Praise 19:10, 8 September 2018 (UTC)
- Okay, but just for the record, I wasn't playing "armchair shrink". I was merely adding Snarky Point of View where I felt it was necessary. And besides, the article already stated that it was highly unlikely that her claims of mold poisoning were true, so I didn't think that adding a joke about Owens' deranged tweets would be a problem. Nevertheless, I promise to stop adding the joke about her deranged tweeting being caused by mold poisoning. LuodiWang (talk) 20:38, 8 September 2018 (UTC)
- Okay, yeah, but the edit 141 reverted absolutely was that. Psychopathy is a diagnosable mental illness, not an insult. ikanreed 🐐Bleat at me 20:58, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
- I thought that it was okay since Michelle Malkin's page had it. LuodiWang (talk) 21:23, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks for pointing that out. 141.134.75.236 (talk) 22:25, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
- I thought that it was okay since Michelle Malkin's page had it. LuodiWang (talk) 21:23, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
- Okay, yeah, but the edit 141 reverted absolutely was that. Psychopathy is a diagnosable mental illness, not an insult. ikanreed 🐐Bleat at me 20:58, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
Grab a mop, you fuck[edit]
Dear LuodiWang, We regret to inform you that DuceMoosolini hates you with the fires of a thousand suns and you have been therefore demoted to the rank of |
All jokes aside, I know I got snippy at you earlier, but I think you're a pretty good editor. Keep it up and please continue not being a shithead. Regards from your local affordable high-end eatery, Chef Moosolini’s Ristorante ItalianoMake a Reservation 04:28, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
NOOOOO[edit]
We don't need an article on Pewdiepie!! Imagine the HORROR!!! — Dysk (contribs) 21:01, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
- Can you be a bit more specific about why an article on Pewdiepie would be a bad idea? LuodiWang (talk) 14:22, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
- Pewdiepie is a super-famous youtuber, but I don't think there is much to him, its all manufactured media posturing, with a ton of fans generating controversy where there shouldn't be any by rights. What if anything would be missional about a pewdiepie article? — Dysk (contribs) 15:33, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
Edits to Lauren Chen's Page[edit]
Why did you revert the edit I made to the Lauren Chen page. The citation for the information was to a page that does not exist. You reverted the page to add un-sourced data. — Unsigned, by: 72.213.133.235 / talk
- I have waited > 48 hours and you have not provided a response, and the information is still un-sourced. If there is no response or new source data added, I will have to revert the changes you made to the page. Thanks — Unsigned, by: 72.213.133.235 / talk