Talk:Tharsis

This is pointless. Get rid of it? Totnesmartin 11:40, 24 April 2009 (EDT)

This was written as a rebuttal of sorts to an Answers Research Journal article. It was quick and dirty and could be much better, but I never got back to it. --Edgerunner⁷⁶_{Save me Tsisnaajini!} 13:23, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

Maybe you could work the connection in. Totnesmartin 13:33, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

What to do next

I've had an email from Edgerunner in which he hopes to make this a side-by-side rebuttal to this pile of poo. I'll have a go later today if I can. Totnesmartin 10:43, 30 April 2009 (UTC)

Not finished

But I have to go to bed now. Surprise me. Totnesmartin 21:53, 30 April 2009 (UTC)

That thing at AIG might make a nice AotW, when this is ready as our full on-site rebuttal. ħuman 00:04, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

New title

In his intercom message Martin suggested this needs a new title, I thought along similar lines. Not that "Tharsis" isn't an eminently brilliant title (that no one will ever link to or search for?), but the AIG article is a bit broader and maybe we should go after the whole thing? Call it "Age of Mars" or something? Oh, and let's put the link to the "source" article explicitly in the lead, rather than in a footnote? The footnote would still be needed for the date of access, etc., of course. ħuman 22:20, 2 May 2009 (UTC)

Mars flood catastrophe theory? Mars and the great flood? It probably has to have "flod" in there as there are more than one Mars catastrophe theory.Totnesmartin 07:21, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

Word of the week: "Flod". Eggselent! _and marmite 07:31, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

Brilliang! Totnesmartin 08:26, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

Earthflood, Marsflood - why no Venusflood to create MegaSauna?

If/when some creationist lemon-brain writes a "proof" that venus disproves an old universe (hmm, Velikovsky...) we can do one. Totnesmartin (talk) 11:35, 17 July 2010 (UTC)

This needs moving to Martian flood or similar. User 213 1 35 101 (talk) 22:09, 16 December 2010 (UTC)