There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with ![]() ![]() |
Talk:Walter Brown
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
De-Conservapedification[edit]
I say we just move the article to CPspace and be done with it. — Unsigned, by: TheLateGatsby / talk / contribs
- Why? He is not related to CP and TerryH does have a creationist internet existence outside of CP.
ГенгисIs the Pope a Catholic?
12:49, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
- This article is the last in the De-CP category. Can we just delete that template, then? (Sorry for not signing above.) --TheLateGatsby (talk) 12:56, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
Delete?[edit]
The guy's debate doesn't seem significant and his name and credentials, the only really important things in this article, are already in Hydroplate theory. Sam Tally-ho! 06:13, 26 December 2012 (UTC)
- He gets a Wikipedia article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Walt_Brown_%28creationist%29 which would be worth taking large chunks of - David Gerard (talk) 11:01, 26 December 2012 (UTC)
- Keep: This article was useful to me, even though it's more of a blog entry than an encyclopedia article. The tactic used by the Creationist: first, to issue a debate challenge and pretend that it's the epistemic equivalent to peer review, and then, when someone accepts the challenge, to share the challenger's personal information with the weaponized Creationist Internetters—it would be a tragedy to lose this. Keep, at least until this insight can find another home. Tactical rationalism (should that be a category?). Wigitsune (talk) 00:47, 30 March 2021 (UTC)