Talk:White Panther Party

Mission-tagging

How are these guys relevant to the mission? PowderSmokeAndLeather: Say something once, why say it again?. 15:28, 9 August 2013 (UTC)

If the article does not smart off against the "White Panthers," plank 2 is of dubious application. ListenerX^TalkerX 15:36, 9 August 2013 (UTC)

We have articles on racist and anti-racist groups, so I don't see why this group deserves special mention either way. It may not deserve a separate article due to relative obscurity, but it could probably be rolled into Black Panthers.--Token Conservative (talk) 15:47, 9 August 2013 (UTC)

Then we can talk about why the Black Panthers are missional. PowderSmokeAndLeather: Say something once, why say it again?. 19:12, 9 August 2013 (UTC)

"RationalWiki is not a general encyclopedia; it does not require articles on every known subject. However, the wiki's mainspace welcomes many articles that do not relate to the primary missions of RationalWiki providing that they are factually accurate and of interest to the community at large. These include articles on general science, historical events and important individuals throughout the world." [1] If this isn't welcome at RW then we have lost our way. Why would we delete this - it is a brief and interesting little tidbit about a group that most people have never heard of. Damo^Hi 10:53, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

Can we get rid of the mission tag now? The landmark United States v. U.S. District Court decision alone makes them on topic. Secret Squirrel (talk) 10:49, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

Libertarian Moonbattery?

Why is this listed under libertarian moonbattery? I know I’m rather biased on this issue, but I don’t see anything extremely irrational in the White Panther Party. LoudCSharp (talk) 16:47, 30 January 2019 (UTC)