There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with ![]() ![]() |
Talk:World War III
Develop to taste - given the number of books on the topic there should be summat on the subject. 82.44.143.26 (talk) 14:55, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
World War III[edit]
Will probably be the US versus China. Talsley (talk) 21:40, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
No it will involve the humans of Earth and the robots that have been persuaded to colonize Mars (so they have no need to destroy their human creators and can get round the Three Laws) over who has rights to the ownership of Venus and its resources (once it has been cooled down to reasonable temperatures).
The Cold War-World War III has yet to be explored fully. 82.44.143.26 (talk) 18:53, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
The Dominican Republic versus Papua New Guinea. Place yer bets, people! Meshakhad (talk) 04:05, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
A version of [1] or a revival of trial by battle #involving the heads of government/leading political figures# of the several countries involved.
Can mention be made of the Wikipedia page [2]? 82.44.143.26 (talk) 16:39, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
No mention of The Donald yet? 86.146.100.97 (talk) 21:25, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
The leaders of any countries contemplating starting WW III should be taken to Bramble Bank - and only retrieved when they have reached an agreement. Anna Livia (talk) 12:25, 22 August 2017 (UTC)
Another prediction[edit]
'The difference between war and peace is that in war you actually know who your enemies are.' Anna Livia (talk) 10:25, 19 November 2021 (UTC)