Template talk:Conservapedia

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search

I don't think "Mormonism" belongs in this template! ~~ C®acker 19:17, 11 June 2007 (CDT)

Do you think that we should add a link to Conservapedia:Banwatch to this?--Offeep 14:05, 29 August 2007 (CDT)

There is an extraneous linefeed after the first item in each of the two lists. Anyone want to take a stab at fixing that? humanUser talk:Human 19:23, 8 January 2008 (EST)

Criticism[edit]

Shouldn't we change the "criticism" to something else? They seem rather out of place under that header, specially "SDG" "Timeline" and "CP in the news". NightFlareStill doesn't have a (nonstub) RWW article. 22:36, 2 July 2008 (EDT)

Commentary, perhaps? I think they are all "criticism" of one kind or another, aren't they? ħumanUser talk:Human 23:06, 2 July 2008 (EDT)
Yeah, I think commentary seems better. NightFlareStill doesn't have a (nonstub) RWW article. 14:09, 3 July 2008 (EDT)
OK, I changed it. New question: I don't think "banwatch" should be so prominent (or even here?), it's not very interesting/not updated much. I also think the editor's report card might need to be looked at to make sure it is worthy of going on the template. ħumanUser talk:Human 14:20, 3 July 2008 (EDT)
I did the report card, and agree that it is probably out of date now. Maybe when I do a new one.... Jollyfish.gifGenghisOur ignorance is God; what we know is science. 14:52, 3 July 2008 (EDT)

The Conservapedia article[edit]

The link at the top says Conservapedia, my initial instinct is click this to get to the article itself, so my suggestion is,

  1. Change the link at the top to the Conservapedia article
  2. Add something like "More articles" at the bottom to link to Category:Conservapedia

Any thoughts? 3.14159 (not signed in)

Sounds good to me. Changing it now... <blink></blink> 01:59, 24 July 2008 (EDT)
Okay thanks. 3.14159 (not signed in)

Article matrix[edit]

I'd live to add the Conservapedia:Article_matrix to this template, as I find the matrix is not a prominent as it should be. (ie if you don't know it exists, you're unlikely to find it - if that makes any sense at all) DeltaStarSenior SysopSpeciationspeed! 23:38, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

Single curved corner[edit]

Looks weird. Can both bottom corners be curved please? ħumanUser talk:Human 19:05, 20 May 2010 (UTC)

All or nothing! — Sincerely, Neveruse / Talk / Block 19:10, 20 May 2010 (UTC)

Next Insight Page[edit]

The Page "Conservapedia:Andy's next Insight" has recieved 120 votes and 9 entries in just a few days, so looks to be taking off. Does anybody object to its inclusion in the "Fun" section of this template? DalekEXTERMINATE 13:16, 24 November 2010 (UTC)

Sidebar revamp[edit]

Heyo, I figured that the old sidebar looked way too inconsistent with the current sidebar design, so I decided to revamp it. If anyone has any complaints, put them here. PoorlyDrawnRockford.jpeg Rockford the Roe boop my snootpraise Oscar Wilde 05:57, 11 April 2021 (UTC)