There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff — we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity.
If everyone seeing this today donates $5, we will meet our goal for 2018.
| Fighting pseudoscience isn't free.|
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $20 or whatever you can today with !
Needs these before being good enough for use:
- better top tagline
- background images of rainbows (very faded, not garish) rather than blocks of solid colour - this requires referencing an image by its name in our repo (the unicorn pic is on Wikimedia Commons)
- more stuff for the key concepts
- OK. It's not possible to set background-image in MediaWiki syntax, the sanitiser removes it (unless you make the wiki open to arbitrary image includes, which is almost always bad). Anyone else up to making this shinier?
Tag at the top
I liked "unifying principle" better, actually. It's such a dead-on parody of every new age text ever. "Dolphins and money" doesn't quite have the same punch, in my opinion. Wehpudicabok (talk) 04:30, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
- So purty.En attendant Godot 17:12, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
Thing is, while I like the icon, I really like Röstigraben's icon, I intentionally left this out of my spree in order to keep the use of papyrus as the font. It's not a big deal to put an override into the master template, but it seemed a little pointless just for this one thing. ADK...I'll loll your memo! 18:58, 4 August 2011 (UTC)