|
Nominations and Campaigning for the 2024 RationalWiki Moderator Election are now open |
User talk:CaptainCaptain
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
|
Your welcome to RationalWiki is lukewarm at best, CaptainCaptain.
This observation is due to the nature of your initial edits. Pull up a goat and try not to make trouble. We realize it is possible that you do not understand the nature of the site or our objectives. Please see our guide for newcomers and our community standards to clarify things for you. If you're still interested in contributing, please see what our articles are intended to be. |
--Arisboch ☞✍☜☞✉☜ 00:57, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
yh[edit]
no 8k long list of youtube videos please. --"Paravant" Talk & Contribs 05:10, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
- Uh, most of them were site links...like maybe 3 or 4 were youtube...what's the matter, dislike evidence?CaptainCaptain (talk) 05:12, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
- When its badly formatted and spammy, yes--"Paravant" Talk & Contribs 05:25, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
- thank you for tweaking it then, assuming you did.CaptainCaptain (talk) 05:26, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
- You can find better ways to support your points without posting a few thousand characters of link spam--"Paravant" Talk & Contribs 05:28, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
- I've formatted it, if you delete it again, it is totally fair to say you are sticking your fingers in your ears because evidence is poison to you. CaptainCaptain (talk) 05:35, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
- You can find better ways to support your points without posting a few thousand characters of link spam--"Paravant" Talk & Contribs 05:28, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
- thank you for tweaking it then, assuming you did.CaptainCaptain (talk) 05:26, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
- When its badly formatted and spammy, yes--"Paravant" Talk & Contribs 05:25, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
MRW[edit]
Mm, such a good .gif. Fuzzy. Cat. Potato! (talk/stalk) 22:41, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
- Some child deleted my post. What are you trying to say here? CaptainCaptain (talk) 00:02, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
Don't[edit]
Speaking of childlike behaviour, don't blank the unwelcome template. WatcherIntheDark (talk) 00:25, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
- Yeah, you'll end up in the vandal bin, able to only edit once every 30 minutes if you keep this stuff up. You can't delete text from your talk page, either.---Mona- (talk) 00:28, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
- Guess you should all grow up and stop deleting links when I post them to provide evidence on threads then. I'm only playing the game, I never made the rules. When it comes to deleting things, y'all take the cake. CaptainCaptain (talk) 00:29, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
User page[edit]
A friendly suggestion: you might want to create a user page with a brief intro to yourself. Seeing that red link all the time is a bit jarring. (((Zack Martin)))™ 09:15, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
- Oh the red link isn't just visible to me. Okay then CaptainCaptain (talk) 09:46, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
- That's better. But, do you have any opinions on matters that aren't related to gender or race? What's your take on religion (are you an atheist or a believer, and if the later, a believer in what)? How about economics? What music do you like? I think you mentioned you live in New Zealand - whereabouts if you don't mind me asking? What do you think of John Key? And any opinions on other country's politics? (Malcolm Turnbull, David Cameron, Barack Obama, Justin Trudeau?) (((Zack Martin)))™ 09:58, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
- I'm an atheist but it's not worth mentioning, the face of social conflict is no longer on religion. I am too practical to assume a stance on economics, I prefer to watch everything unfold and play as the game asks. My music tastes are my own, and varied. I think John is a weak leader and corrupt but that the Labor party is equally incompetent and stupid, and I believe the party system should be dismantled for its lack of democracy. I do not involve myself in the politics of other countries apart from the US, where my family comes from. CaptainCaptain (talk) 10:04, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
- "the face of social conflict is no longer on religion" - that's an interesting statement. Probably mostly true in New Zealand or Australia. But maybe not so much on a global level? Look at the Middle East. Look even at certain states of the US. (((Zack Martin)))™ 10:06, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
- The Middle East has been weakened by its firm religious beliefs for decades now. When I made that statement, I meant that the big dogs no longer deal with matters of religion when it comes to discussing social issues. Even in the states, the government is controlled mostly by north easterners who generally have little to do with religion, and its strength is fading across the board as the youth of today find more cutting issues to address. The Middle East will eventually collapse under its own weight as religious sects either destroy each other or scare anyone of value away, and then the topic will cease to be the lighter of many a flame war. In summary, religion is not really a matter worth discussing any more because the modern youth of the western world are for the most part not concerned with it. Except SocJus. They're very concerned with it. CaptainCaptain (talk) 10:12, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
- What about the phenomenon of the religious right in the United States? It is rather weak in the Northeast or the West Coast, but in places like Alabama it is still calling the shots. At the national level, it has a lot of influence in the Republican party, so much so that Republican candidates for President need to at least pay lip service to it. (I think part of why Carson is overtaking Trump in the polls now, is that Carson genuinely belongs to the religious right, Trump says the right things but few think he really believes them.) (((Zack Martin)))™ 10:21, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
- The right is now split between so many candidates that at this moment in time I see no way that the Republican Party will win the election, they will be steamrolled by either the corrupt moron Hillary or, with luck, the alright Sanders. The religious right is also much les powerful in practice than the paid right who serve the corporations. Corps don't care about god, they care about cash. CaptainCaptain (talk) 10:25, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
- The interesting thing about your comment that Sanders is "alright", combined with your great interest shown in gender-related questions, is I suspect Sanders' views on those issues are probably closer to Clinton's than to your own. My impression, is that on issues such as gender/feminism/etc, Clinton and Sanders don't differ that much at all; the primary differences between them are in economic and foreign policy. (((Zack Martin)))™ 11:46, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
- Hillary is corrupt and is little better than a paid republican flying s different colored flag. Sanders has not proven himself to be s corrupt and weak leader yet. CaptainCaptain (talk) 21:14, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
- The interesting thing about your comment that Sanders is "alright", combined with your great interest shown in gender-related questions, is I suspect Sanders' views on those issues are probably closer to Clinton's than to your own. My impression, is that on issues such as gender/feminism/etc, Clinton and Sanders don't differ that much at all; the primary differences between them are in economic and foreign policy. (((Zack Martin)))™ 11:46, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
- The right is now split between so many candidates that at this moment in time I see no way that the Republican Party will win the election, they will be steamrolled by either the corrupt moron Hillary or, with luck, the alright Sanders. The religious right is also much les powerful in practice than the paid right who serve the corporations. Corps don't care about god, they care about cash. CaptainCaptain (talk) 10:25, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
- What about the phenomenon of the religious right in the United States? It is rather weak in the Northeast or the West Coast, but in places like Alabama it is still calling the shots. At the national level, it has a lot of influence in the Republican party, so much so that Republican candidates for President need to at least pay lip service to it. (I think part of why Carson is overtaking Trump in the polls now, is that Carson genuinely belongs to the religious right, Trump says the right things but few think he really believes them.) (((Zack Martin)))™ 10:21, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
- The Middle East has been weakened by its firm religious beliefs for decades now. When I made that statement, I meant that the big dogs no longer deal with matters of religion when it comes to discussing social issues. Even in the states, the government is controlled mostly by north easterners who generally have little to do with religion, and its strength is fading across the board as the youth of today find more cutting issues to address. The Middle East will eventually collapse under its own weight as religious sects either destroy each other or scare anyone of value away, and then the topic will cease to be the lighter of many a flame war. In summary, religion is not really a matter worth discussing any more because the modern youth of the western world are for the most part not concerned with it. Except SocJus. They're very concerned with it. CaptainCaptain (talk) 10:12, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
- "the face of social conflict is no longer on religion" - that's an interesting statement. Probably mostly true in New Zealand or Australia. But maybe not so much on a global level? Look at the Middle East. Look even at certain states of the US. (((Zack Martin)))™ 10:06, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
- I'm an atheist but it's not worth mentioning, the face of social conflict is no longer on religion. I am too practical to assume a stance on economics, I prefer to watch everything unfold and play as the game asks. My music tastes are my own, and varied. I think John is a weak leader and corrupt but that the Labor party is equally incompetent and stupid, and I believe the party system should be dismantled for its lack of democracy. I do not involve myself in the politics of other countries apart from the US, where my family comes from. CaptainCaptain (talk) 10:04, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
- That's better. But, do you have any opinions on matters that aren't related to gender or race? What's your take on religion (are you an atheist or a believer, and if the later, a believer in what)? How about economics? What music do you like? I think you mentioned you live in New Zealand - whereabouts if you don't mind me asking? What do you think of John Key? And any opinions on other country's politics? (Malcolm Turnbull, David Cameron, Barack Obama, Justin Trudeau?) (((Zack Martin)))™ 09:58, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
Wage gap[edit]
Why not take it up on that talk page, then? Mʀ. Wʜɪsᴋᴇʀs, Esϙᴜɪʀᴇ (talk/stalk) 13:22, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
- I can't really be bothered, the links I offer will either be deleted or remarked upon as 'right wing' and dismissed. Even though I have many links. CaptainCaptain (talk) 22:01, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
- Try it. FU22YC47P07470 (talk/stalk) 22:04, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
- Hehe. Why does that line remind me of the New Conglomerate line "You want no piece of this"? CaptainCaptain (talk) 22:05, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
- It seems that she already has. 192․168․1․42 (talk) 22:22, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
- As I said, my opponents have been guilty of evidence deletion and meaningless source slander. CaptainCaptain (talk) 22:25, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
- Try it. FU22YC47P07470 (talk/stalk) 22:04, 1 November 2015 (UTC)