|
Nominations and Campaigning for the 2024 RationalWiki Moderator Election are now open |
User talk:Civic Cat/List of music videos featuring barefoot females
Is there any chance....[edit]
...that you could host your soft-core link farm on a word document on your own computer, and not our communal servers? P-Foster Talk "Armed with the knowledge of our past we can charter a course for our future"--MX 21:23, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
- Is there any chance that you, Ty, and Weaseloid can go fuck yourselves? Civic Cat Talk to Civic Cat 19:02, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
- It's like Brxbrx all over again.
Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 20:01, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
- Fine name you have there! I assure you, I'm being quite reactive. Civic Cat Talk to Civic Cat 20:03, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
- It's like Brxbrx all over again.
- Is there any chance that you, Ty, and Weaseloid can go fuck yourselves? Civic Cat Talk to Civic Cat 19:02, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
What the hell is this?[edit]
What the hell is this? OnTheInternetNobodyKnowsYou'reAGod (talk) 19:23, 19 October 2012 (UTC)
- A sub-page article. Civic Cat Talk to Civic Cat 19:28, 19 October 2012 (UTC)
- RationalWiki:Community Standards#User pages, "An editor's user page, and other pages in their user space, is their personal space and they are free to do with it what they want (with common-sense-exceptions, such as patently offensive material, copyright violations or spam)." Long story. Civic Cat Talk to Civic Cat 19:32, 19 October 2012 (UTC)
- Weirdo. OnTheInternetNobodyKnowsYou'reAGod (talk) 20:00, 19 October 2012 (UTC)
- Takes one to know one. :-p
I kinda like your video Count Ossie--one can get tired of hearing Bb Marley for the nth time." :-D
Actually, I was going to do an article on foot fetishism several months ago. I might still. Civic Cat Talk to Civic Cat 20:10, 19 October 2012 (UTC)
- Takes one to know one. :-p
- Weirdo. OnTheInternetNobodyKnowsYou'reAGod (talk) 20:00, 19 October 2012 (UTC)
- RationalWiki:Community Standards#User pages, "An editor's user page, and other pages in their user space, is their personal space and they are free to do with it what they want (with common-sense-exceptions, such as patently offensive material, copyright violations or spam)." Long story. Civic Cat Talk to Civic Cat 19:32, 19 October 2012 (UTC)
- See here for old discussion on this disturbing page--"Shut up, Brx." 20:56, 19 October 2012 (UTC)
A Thousand Feet of Film[edit]
Hopefully this link works but there are probably more bare female feet in this music video than all the rest combined...
http://m.youtube.com/watch?gl=GB&hl=en&client=mv-google&v=tmbqNsTqfnA
Albannach (talk) 00:17, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
- Haven't seen that name in a while. :-D Civic Cat Talk to Civic Cat 00:22, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Yeah, wide variety of ethnic feet, of various genders... and one of them is a mean piano and guitar player!
By the way, have you checked out Kate Bush videos? I looked up Wuthering Heights, but no joy there. Admittedly this isn't my scene, but I could have sworn she did balletic movements with no shoes on in that video but not so... her other stuff might be worth checking out. She's the kind of lady to do it!Albannach (talk) 01:01, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
- I have, but as you indicate, they tend to be sparse. I'm not too much of a fan of her later stuff, like Running up the hill. I might include this: Kate Bush - The Sensual World - Official Music Video. Civic Cat Talk to Civic Cat 22:37, 11 April 2013 (UTC)
Why should this sub-page be deleted? (Let's set some precedents)[edit]
You don't like the rules, change them. Civic Cat Talk to Civic Cat 22:31, 11 April 2013 (UTC)
I don't have a problem with this page at all. If it was advertising a vile fetish I might, but it's not... in fact it's kindy cute...
I consider this page harmless, not spam and not worth deleting. It's also in personal space.Albannach (talk) 22:46, 11 April 2013 (UTC)
- Thank you, Albannach. The rules seem to agree with us. Civic Cat Talk to Civic Cat 22:48, 11 April 2013 (UTC)
- Oh look PowderSmokeAndLeather, a list of songs people might fap to. Civic Cat Talk to Civic Cat 23:01, 11 April 2013 (UTC)
- Thank you, Albannach. The rules seem to agree with us. Civic Cat Talk to Civic Cat 22:48, 11 April 2013 (UTC)
I don't see how this page jeopardises charitable status, and see it as more quirky and different than creepy or masturbatory. I don't understand why it annoys some people so much.-Albannach (talk) 23:10, 11 April 2013 (UTC)
- It is creepy, off-topic and embarrassing to a site attempting to provide credible, rational information. The Liberal/Conservative example cited above is arguably on-topic (I don't think it is a good article, but at least it can be defended on relevance grounds). VOXHUMANA 23:45, 11 April 2013 (UTC)
- VOXHUMANA. Good that you showed up to discuss. Creepy? Maybe yes, maybe no. Off-mission? Yes. Many SUB-pages are. Embarassing? Many general articles here are embarassing. The Liberal/Conservative says that all of Bob Dylan's songs of the 60's are good, yet it enjoys a status higher than a user page. I'd argue it's more an embarassment. I would clean it up (or help to) were it not for things like arguing about this. Civic Cat Talk to Civic Cat 00:00, 12 April 2013 (UTC)
- Civic Cat - you now have my agreement that the policy on User subpages needs to be looked at. I think your article is utter garbage, but as you correctly state, there is nothing in the rules which prohibits it. So I'm going to take your worthless piece of crap to the community as a test case. VOXHUMANA 00:38, 12 April 2013 (UTC)
- Ah, VOXHUMANA, how can you say those terrible things. You talk like an anti-pornographer who hasn't the courage of his own discomfort with sex. :-D Let me guess, like most anti-porn and other censorious types, you MIGHT have given the subpage a cursory glance. Civic Cat Talk to Civic Cat 19:38, 12 April 2013 (UTC)
- Civic Cat - you now have my agreement that the policy on User subpages needs to be looked at. I think your article is utter garbage, but as you correctly state, there is nothing in the rules which prohibits it. So I'm going to take your worthless piece of crap to the community as a test case. VOXHUMANA 00:38, 12 April 2013 (UTC)
- Is there such a thing as high quality porn? Most of it is badly acted, badly directed, badly scripted, badly edited, badly produced, badly scored (pun intended) and just ridiculous. Oh, and not to mention cliched, exploitative, unerotic and of questionable artistic merit.-Albannach (talk) 04:21, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
- Personally, I judge a porno by the cleverness of the pun title. Captain Swing (bringer of nachos) 04:51, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
- Is there such a thing as high quality porn? Most of it is badly acted, badly directed, badly scripted, badly edited, badly produced, badly scored (pun intended) and just ridiculous. Oh, and not to mention cliched, exploitative, unerotic and of questionable artistic merit.-Albannach (talk) 04:21, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
Or the Blair Sex Project, The Oral Office, Flesh Gordon etc. Most of them are pretty contrived and dismal (FG's ok) and not erotic.-Albannach (talk) 18:12, 13 April 2013 (UTC)