User talk:IrrationalWiki

Hoo boy. I wonder where this is going. Narky Sawtooth (Floof!~) 06:19, 3 June 2015 (UTC)

We always welcome those who want to improve the site Doxys Midnight Runner (talk) 10:39, 3 June 2015 (UTC)

Are you from either of these sites?

/r/TheRedPill or therightstuff? oʇɐʇoԀʇɐϽʎzznℲ (talk/stalk) 17:05, 3 June 2015 (UTC)

"Rationality" is a bit like "Ethics"

If you want to try to understand this website, imagine it was called "EthicalWiki" - i.e. it was filled with people with a claimed devotion to ethics. Now, any website composed of people with a claimed devotion to ethics, will be convinced that whatever particular ethical views they have chosen are right, and that others who adopt a different view are being unethical. Substitute "rational" for "ethical", and you have this site. But, just as it would be rather a waste of time to argue against the ethics of such an EthicalWiki - "you claim to be ethical, yet you say X is (un)ethical, when clearly it is not!" - it is equally a waste of time to argue about the rationality of this site. Since no one can agree on what is ethical, trying to found a site on a claimed devotion to ethics-in-general, as opposed to a particular ethical viewpoint, is incoherent. In the same way, as the term "rational" is as fraught with disagreement as "ethical" is, this "RationalWiki" can fare no better. (((Zack Martin)))^™ 12:03, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

Says someone who made up his own religion. Bicycle^wheel 12:15, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

Thank you for the free advertising, comrade. And, I just wanted to tell you, that this is a beautiful world, and I know that you have a beautiful soul, and I wish you the very best. (((Zack Martin)))^™ 12:29, 15 June 2015 (UTC)