There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with ![]() ![]() |
User talk:Judge King/Sovereign Class History
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Hmm... MarcusCicero (talk) 10:25, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
- It's not often I'm on the same side as MC but I don't see this as particularly fitting to our mission, not does it add lulz. Silver Sloth (talk) 10:33, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
- It is an essay, not an article. - π 10:34, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
- Personally I think essay are of a differant standard to mainspace articles. And as such, they are essays. Ace McWickedModel 500 10:38, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
- It is an essay, not an article. - π 10:34, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
I think we should put our foot (feet?) down here and userfy it. Evil word Phantom! 11:11, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
- To be honest, this is why I stopped hanging around on Star Trek forums.
sshole 12:37, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
That screenshot[edit]
...Is of very dubious copyright status. Evil word Phantom! 13:43, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
- Unlike a lot of other images of very dubious copyright status, this one is at least relevant to the article. Nx (talk) 14:00, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
- Well, it still needs a Fair Use rationale. Evil word Phantom! 14:07, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
- Can we justify Fair Use pictures for off-mission articles? Totnesmartin (talk) 18:29, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
- Can we justify Fair Use pictures for userboxes? Nx (talk) 18:39, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
- The userbox pictures are at least low res. Evil word Phantom! 18:51, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
- I was too lazy to download, resize and upload the image. Nx (talk) 18:54, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
- at that resolution, it had to have been somewhat cropped or resized? 2.37:1? A pretty dodgy rationale, but... meh. — Signed, by: Neveruse513 / Talk / Block 19:00, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
- I was too lazy to download, resize and upload the image. Nx (talk) 18:54, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
- The userbox pictures are at least low res. Evil word Phantom! 18:51, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
- Can we justify Fair Use pictures for userboxes? Nx (talk) 18:39, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
- Can we justify Fair Use pictures for off-mission articles? Totnesmartin (talk) 18:29, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
- Well, it still needs a Fair Use rationale. Evil word Phantom! 14:07, 31 July 2009 (UTC)