2025 RationalWiki 'Oregon Plan' Fundraiser

There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity.

Fighting pseudoscience isn't free.
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with PayPal Logo.png!
Donations so far: $9223.37Goal: $10000

User talk:Judge King/Sovereign Class History

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Hmm... MarcusCicero (talk) 10:25, 31 July 2009 (UTC)

It's not often I'm on the same side as MC but I don't see this as particularly fitting to our mission, not does it add lulz. Silver Sloth (talk) 10:33, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
It is an essay, not an article. - π 10:34, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
Personally I think essay are of a differant standard to mainspace articles. And as such, they are essays. Ace McWickedModel 500 10:38, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
Heh, one could start a whole little subwiki with a load of essays that need have nothing to do with RW. This message brought to you by: Toastrespondand honey 10:47, 31 July 2009 (UTC)

I think we should put our foot (feet?) down here and userfy it. Evil word Phantom! 11:11, 31 July 2009 (UTC)

To be honest, this is why I stopped hanging around on Star Trek forums. Scarlet A.pngsshole 12:37, 31 July 2009 (UTC)

That screenshot[edit]

...Is of very dubious copyright status. Evil word Phantom! 13:43, 31 July 2009 (UTC)

Unlike a lot of other images of very dubious copyright status, this one is at least relevant to the article. Nx (talk) 14:00, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
Well, it still needs a Fair Use rationale. Evil word Phantom! 14:07, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
Can we justify Fair Use pictures for off-mission articles? Totnesmartin (talk) 18:29, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
Can we justify Fair Use pictures for userboxes? Nx (talk) 18:39, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
The userbox pictures are at least low res. Evil word Phantom! 18:51, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
I was too lazy to download, resize and upload the image. Nx (talk) 18:54, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
at that resolution, it had to have been somewhat cropped or resized? 2.37:1? A pretty dodgy rationale, but... meh. — Signed, by: Neveruse513 / Talk / Block 19:00, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
Ideally, I would delete it, but as Nx points out, we have lots of other images with dodgy rationales here. Evil word Phantom! 19:03, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
This is released under CC 3.0 if it helps. Scarlet A.pngsshole 19:04, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
Let us consult the author. Evil word Phantom! 19:13, 31 July 2009 (UTC)