User talk:Zoetrope
Cleaned out for now.
Talkpages[edit]
Don't clear talkpages without archiving what you have removed. Could you place what you have removed into an archive? - π 10:56, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
- Pi is quite correct. Please see Community_Standards#User_pages.--BobNot Jim 11:02, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
- I have done it for you. - π 12:54, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
Facepalm[edit]
wheres the trust
Weeping sores[edit]
Due to your pussy mounds I have made you a sysop. Here is your antiseptic. AceMcWicked 00:24, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
Hide/Show[edit]
Could you not abuse hide/show like that? - π 10:02, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
- ...you mean, by protecting people who edited without being logged in from having their IP broadcast to anybody who might be interested? I was just trying to be helpful, do/undo whatever you like. 10:06, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
- There is a warning for them. They don't need protecting, if we did not want anonymous editing we would not have it active. - π 10:18, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
Well, I made a mistake. Just undo it dude no big deal. 19:30, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
you got mail[edit]
Heh heh... yeah. El TajDon't make me do stuff 22:05, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
- You write lame wigos. ħuman 06:29, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
=(. i have no problem with you rewriting it, if you'd like. 06:34, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
- Does not need rewriting. Did not need writing. Sucked. Lame wigo, pointless. You spent four edits on it, all wasted. ħuman 06:53, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
Whatever.
Hide/Show[edit]
Could you undo all that now? There is no need for that. - π 22:58, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
- It's just the redirects from old username to the new one, don't get your panties in a bunch. 23:02, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
- You are misusing the hide/show, please undo it. - π 23:03, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
- Dude, what's going on in the Deletion Log--it looks like Richard Nixon went through it. TheoryOfPractice (talk) 23:07, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
- I agree—this is an abuse of an ability that should be used only for something major—which a name change and deletion log are not. Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 23:11, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
- Dude, what's going on in the Deletion Log--it looks like Richard Nixon went through it. TheoryOfPractice (talk) 23:07, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
- You are misusing the hide/show, please undo it. - π 23:03, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
Ugh, there's no trust anymore. I emailed you, pi. I really don't see why everybody is so up in arms about me deleting my own user page, and hiding my own name change. 23:09, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
- I have replied to said email. - π 23:26, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
- "Trust" is secondary to "openness". Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 23:11, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
- Look, I'm gun-shy when it comes to fucking around with deletions (...because of Teh Incident)--can PI or RA make this conform to standards, please? TheoryOfPractice (talk) 23:14, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
- If you want to undo all those hides, I can just leave here. Everybody is a sysop, so I'm not really "hiding" anything from anybody, since you can see exactly what's being hidden. But everybody is just that committed to this, I can just delete my account and leave here. 23:16, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
- If this is such a dealbreaker, why not explain why? Anybody - sysop or otherwise - can see what your previous username was just by looking through your contributions & how you signed yourself. WéáśéĺóíďMethinks it is a Weasel 23:20, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
- Also, no, you can't "delete" an account. You can only stop editing from it. WéáśéĺóíďMethinks it is a Weasel 23:23, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
- If you want to undo all those hides, I can just leave here. Everybody is a sysop, so I'm not really "hiding" anything from anybody, since you can see exactly what's being hidden. But everybody is just that committed to this, I can just delete my account and leave here. 23:16, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
- Look, I'm gun-shy when it comes to fucking around with deletions (...because of Teh Incident)--can PI or RA make this conform to standards, please? TheoryOfPractice (talk) 23:14, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
Dude. Nobody trusts you. Now do you see why people think you're either TK or his bitch trolling RW as hard as you troll CP as JacobB. I wish you'd just give up on causing trouble and take a hike already. Conservapederast (talk) 23:22, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
- EC"Hi, I just got here not too long ago, but I'd like to take the rules and toss them out the window 'cause I think they suck." TheoryOfPractice (talk) 23:24, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
- @Top: Done. Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 23:24, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
- Thx. TheoryOfPractice (talk) 23:26, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
- @Top: Done. Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 23:24, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
I'm going after you on CP, JacobB/Zoetrop. You are now my project. Conservapederast (talk) 23:36, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
Conservapedia too?[edit]
So I hear you're one of the editors that also spends some time on Conservapedia? Congratulations on being a sysop there! Pythonscript (talk) 11:25, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
This is one of the rare times where RW actually welcomes a CP sysop. Well, officially at least --Slugboy (talk) 06:54, 25 July 2010 (UTC)