# Conservapedia talk:What is going on at CP?

 World Blogs Clogs CP The Bar (talk) (talk) (talk) (talk) (hic)

As a point of etiquette, please use the [add section] tab above, or the "Add new section" link below, when adding a new topic, and the appropriate  tab when commenting on existing topics. This will lessen the incidence of edit conflicts. Thank you.

For non CP-related talk, please mosey on over to the saloon bar.

Archives for this talk page: Archive list

##  Pray for victims

It's not the first time Andy's given us his unique view on charity. A few Christmases ago, when PJR suggested giving to the poor and homeless, Andy was adamant that they'd be better served by his prayers. The man is a colossal douche. PsyGremlinRunāt! 14:38, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

If I remember it was BrianCo. Or was that the Haitian earthquake? I think Andy eventually posted a link to his local church so that they could send bibles. Генгисmutating 01:25, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
Yeah, I'm sure if I'd lost my home and my possessions I'd be absolutely fucking delighted to learn that a middle class douchebag in New Jersey was praying for me. I really want someone to ask him how he thinks that will possibly help. --JeevesMkII The gentleman's gentleman at the other site 15:07, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
He pulled the same stunt after the Port-au-Prince earthquake, and again after the Fukushima meltdown. Andy just refuses to post charity links, no matter what. I believe his initial excuse after the earthquake was something to do with the Red Cross and Obamacare. After that little tirade, someone suggested he put up a link to Catholic Charities instead - Andy didn't even bother with an excuse after that one. Honestly, of all the weird shit he does, this one makes the least sense.--江斯顿What is it now? 15:26, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
Linkee to Andy's statement.img MDB (the MD is for Maryland, the B is for Bear) 15:29, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
It's just a shame that one cannot pray and donate money. Nope, it's gotta be one or the other. Phiwum (talk) 15:42, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

###  A Moment of Personal Privilege

Speaking as someone who is nominally the same faith as Andy:

Andrew Layton Schlafly, go fuck yourself. With a white-hot fireplace poker tipped with curare, arsenic, and belladonna. And no lubricant. MDB (the MD is for Maryland, the B is for Bear) 16:01, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

SNAP from me Bevo74 (talk) 18:36, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

### A Little Tidbit About Fundamentalist Thinking

As someone who grew up in the evangelical and fundamentalist world, Andy's viewpoint is certainly not unique. The large majority of Christians, including fundamentalist Christians, give money and donations through charity, some will outright supply time and labor, however all will believe prayer is as, if not more, powerful than their physical efforts. It makes sense if you believe in an all-powerful benevolent, yet harsh god who demands justice (and all people are collectively sinners). There is among this a subset of thought that prayer is paramount over any material aid, as I was told once, "what good does all the food and shelter do people, if their souls are hellbound?" and "it is better to be homeless and starving and saved, than well-off and damned". They would pray for the victims recovery, but in the context that they would accept salvation, and believe by doing just this they do more than anyone supplying actual aid.

I would argue though there is another motivation among some Christians, and those types are best represented by Hurlburt. These are Objectivist Christians, who use the principles of Objectivism to justify not giving out charity, believing it would just foster and enable dependance and bad behavior. It is a selfish belief that allows them to effectively ignore the Christian theological belief that supplying need to the poor and destitute is the duty of the believer.--BMcP - Just an astronomy guy 16:34, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

I have to admit, I've never understood the "pray for them" attitude. If some schmuck in New Jersy doesn't ask God to find a little girl trapped in rubble, He's just going to let her die? What a prick. "Well, I was going to let the town be a ruin forever and all those who inhabit it die cold and alone...but since Andy asked nicely, I guess I'll inspire Obama to send FEMA." What's the point of a "divine plan" if anybody can talk you out of it? Carlaugust (talk) 17:42, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
But that's at the heart of the prayer controversy. As someone once said "You cannot petition the lord with prayer", except, of course, that's exactly what those of a religious bent do every day. I've heard the "you don't get it unless you ask for it line" but, taking the "we're all god's children position" I don't refuse to give my child what he needs just because he doesn't ask for it. Especially if he's trapped under a building. "What's that, Patrick, you're trapped. Well I'm not going to help you until you ask." Doesn't play, somehow. Innocent Bystander (talk) 17:58, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
I think my mom use to say, or imply at least, that God only does what the prayer asks if it's what he wants… even though she was also fond of quoting or paraphrasing Matthew 18:19, and that makes prayer fairly pointless. Even as a kid i didn't really understand it, but i rolled with it anyways because, hey, not everything's bound to make sense to me, right? (talk to a) Nihilist 18:06, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
Prayer and the Protestant work ethic are always a great substitute for charity. Nebuchadnezzar (talk) 18:19, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
Yeah, well most people actually think that "God helps those that help themselves" is actually a quote from the Bible too... --Inquisitor (talk) 18:23, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

Andy is laying low because his recent "global warming hoax proved by cool weather" pronouncement is -- shall we say -- diluted by such energetic weather. That's why it was predictable his sorry Christian ass wouldn't bring it up. When called out, "but I'm praying" was his personal bunnyhole. Whoover (talk) 18:24, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

I think everyone's being too harsh on Andy. It's like he says: he's just too darned Jesus-like to give to charity. Charity is well enough for other folks, but obviously Andy can do more good by prayer alone than he could ever do with prayer + charity. Phiwum (talk) 19:36, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

###  I have a question...

Maybe I'm just not well enough up on my new testament, but are there actually any incidents in there of Jesus praying for someone who was in need rather than helping them? I have the feeling Andy is talking out of his arse. --JeevesMkII The gentleman's gentleman at the other site 19:30, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

If he did, that brings up yet -another- good question; what the heck was Jesus doing praying to himself? "Dear me, if I could find it in my heart to help these people, I would really appreciate it. Thanks me! Love, myself." Carlaugust (talk) 19:43, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
I am not aware of a single instance of Jesus praying for any individual. I am not aware of a single instance of Him owning any personal property beyond His clothes and shoes, so He also probably did not give charity. He certainly relied on it to survive. It is now my belief that Andy believes he knows Jesus better than the Gospels describe Him. His hubris is appalling. Nate Keaton (talk) 19:53, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
Maybe Andy thinks the parable of the Good Samaritan is lieb'rul propaganda...? (For anyone not brought up in a vaguely-Christian tradition, the take-home message from Jesus is, "get up off your fat lazy arse and help people in need".) 19:56, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
PFFFT! Andy doesn't care one wit about Jesus or the Bible for that matter. Seriously, just look around at the religious articles on CP. They're jokes. The article for the Sermon on the Mount(pretty much the pinnacle of Jesus' earthly ministry) is only a few paragraphs long, and half of that was added by DonnyC. 'nuff said. --Inquisitor (talk) 05:45, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

Andy has a question of his own: "Do you think Jesus was somehow wrong, and liberal denial right?"img --Night Jaguar (talk) 09:39, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

He's as bad as Kendoll when it comes to avoiding the question. Is this what happens to you when you commit to being wrong in public at all times? --JeevesMkII The gentleman's gentleman at the other site 21:15, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

##  Another fabulous encyclopedic article from bad touch Poor.

Pure classimg as always. With, as always, that little nod towards sexism. Oldusgitus (talk) 17:37, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

I like how there's no citation. (talk to a) Nihilist 18:00, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
That's what peons are for. Vulpius (talk) 18:09, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
Is "HiLDA" even a real acronym? Nebuchadnezzar (talk) 20:00, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
Wow, I must've imagined all those chicks in the Biology department, then. RachelW (talk) 01:28, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
And if we're going by anecdote, my wife - a Chartered Electrical Engineer must be a figment of my imagination Worm (talk) 09:24, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
Victims of feminism, every one. Whoover (talk) 21:08, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

##  Andy Case Study #498

Noticed this in the logs from a few days ago:

1. WilliamWB does a massive cleanup of Conservapedia proven right
2. Andy notices, a week later, that an entry was removed somewhere along the line, adds it back, reverts WilliamWB's edit, and blocks him for 2 years.
3. Andy realizes his reversion re-removed the entry (because WilliamWB didn't even remove it), then adds it back, again.
4. Andy realizes his mistake and unblocks WilliamWB oops that would require Andy to admit he made a mistake, so it didn't happen. Oh well. Justice is served!

Andy, never change. Cow...Hammertime! 20:06, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

I love how Andy's claim that Chavez secretly died back in December (rather than in March) is listed under both Conservapedia proven rightimg and Conservapedia proven wrongimg. --Night Jaguar (talk) 21:18, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
Schrodinger's fact? --JeevesMkII The gentleman's gentleman at the other site 21:49, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

Isn't this WIGO-worthy? An obvious parodist can survive for years by feeding one of Andy's pet fantasies, but an apparently well-meaning editor is roadkill because he got too near a third rail. Whoover (talk) 00:42, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

William WB had nothing to do with removing Andy's pet "abortion causes breast cancer" entry but gets wiped out? Really, the more I see of Schlafly the more I despise his disgusting hypocrisy and ineptitude. ГенгисOur ignorance is God; what we know is science. 01:40, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
They say you should never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity.... but in this case, it seems to be both. Occasionaluse (talk) 13:05, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

##  "Quantum Christiaity"

Hard to add links from my current browser, but as a follow up to yesterday's sorry behavior by Andy, he's given me a new "Conservative Insight". Jesus shows us that it's "Christian" to pray for those in need instead of assisting through direct action (at least when you're not conjuring loaves & fish, curing disease, raising dead friends, or pulling drowning disciples out of the sea). However, it's also a praiseworthy example of being "Christian" for Kevin Durant to donate a million dollarsto help tornado victims when non-Christians would just stand on the sidelines and do nothing (which is totally not like standing on the sidelines and praying). Since Andy Schlafly couldn't possibly be a selfish, lazy, stingy hypocrite who expects taxpayer money to help these people in their emergency instead of charity, there must be an explanation as logical as the Bible, and then it hit me:

The answer is QUANTUM CHRISTIANITY! You're a great Christian if you help with particles (actual material assistance) or waves ("I'm praying for you guys. A lot. Really."). The part that makes it logical is that the "Christian" nature of the act is determined by the observer, and since Andy is doing the obvserving, the outcome is always as it should be.--DinsdaleP (talk) 15:03, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

the other answer is that Andy is a just a prick. AMassiveGay (talk) 15:14, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
Occam's suggests the latter. --Certified Sick Bastard 16:27, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
Andy subscribes to the many-worlds hypothesis. He figures that in potentially far more realities, the tornado didn't even happen because Christians pre-prayed. --Edgerunner76Save me Jebus! 16:31, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

##  Don't mention the war!

Oh dear, Kenny baby seems to have embarrassed the dear leader. Apparently we're not allowed to know Andy exists in real life as well as on CP. --JeevesMkII The gentleman's gentleman at the other site 21:39, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

Poor Ken. He thought he was the only one with a super seekrit identity. --Inquisitor (talk) 22:00, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
Hilarious. I wonder if Kenny has the balls to memoryhole an edit by Dear Leader. Better not chance it Kenny, since your obvious attempt to brown nose so spectacularly backfired. I think this gives more credence to the theory that Andy had a direct hand in Ken's current talkpage hiatus. Shakedangle (talk) 22:08, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
That video is great. Lookit Andy not using a teleprompter. I want to see him LAUGHING though. DogP (talk) 22:23, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
Andy's voice really is the vocal equivalent of Comic Sans, isn't it? Vulpius (talk) 23:07, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
I always thought of it as Brush Script. It thinks it's kinda fancy, but really it's fucking stupid. Comic Sans implies faux-whimsy. There's nothing whimsical, faux or otherwise, about Andy or his ridiculous voice. I love font jokes. Hiphopopotamus (talk) 23:40, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
Coming up with a person's typeface equivalent is an awesome game. Andy's definitely Comic Sans - it's an ostensibly well-designed typeface, but one that begged to be grotesquely misused because of a goofy nature that could only ever be appropriate in the rarest of circumstances. Ken is Papyrus - it attempts, and fails, to be exotic and lend an air of mystery, yet is so clumsy and overplayed that nobody with the least savvy takes it seriously - relegated to the new age bookstores his cult's literature belongs in. I'm naturally Hoefler & Frere Jones' Didot - perhaps the most elegant Didone ever cast. Ace is their Knockout Middleweight - whimsical and humorous, yet powerfully frank. Sterile is their Verlag Extra Light - pure and open, oozing intelligence and sophistication reminiscent of deco letterforms, yet doggedly versatile. Genghis is H&FJ Gotham - venerable and strong of will, yet always refreshing - the typeface that won both of Obama's terms. Psy is Futura Extra Bold Condensed - bitey, powerful, well considered, distinctive, requires a wide berth. And of course, Human is Eurostile Demi, the typeface his logo is set in - attempted as a ham-handed substitute for Helvetica, Frutiger, or Univers, yet requires mastery to set well - a familiar yet distinctive workhorse that needs breathing room for its charming eccentricities to shine. 05:14, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
I don't get a typeface? I'm sad now. --Certified Sick Bastard 15:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
Great idea! Andy would definitely be Comic Sans, or even better, Kristen ITC. When I see them I'm always reminded of people trying to appear professional by using desktop tools, but coming off as amateurish in their execution. Picture any of Andy's online classes, science posts, Lenski correspondence or his legal briefs, and it's a perfect fit. Karajou would be Stencil, of course. Ken, I think, would be Tequila from the Themeworld font collection - it has the look of someone up for 23 hours straight, obsessively tracing over the same letters again and again until they look "just right". --DinsdaleP (talk) 16:34, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
Nutty, I want to kiss you with tongue. PsyGremlin말하십시오 20:55, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
Oh man. Now I have to go through my font book and come up with some specimens. Shat, you can have a typeface, but I don't know enough about you. Send me an email describing who you are, what you do, and some of your freakiest sexual fetishes. 21:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
Fuck email, I'll be open. I'm an eighteen year old sexually confused physics student who eschews human contact and embraces passive aggressive comments in conversation. I get bored incredibly easily and I might be Aspergic. If that is the right word. If it's not, then it should be. On top of that, I don't drink because alcohol tastes bad, I don't do drugs because I can't be bothered to try them, I'm awful at decent conversation and I haven't shown emotion for months and....fuck this, basically think of Craig Tucker and you're not entirely far off. --Certified Sick Bastard 22:11, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
Maybe an early blackletter like Textualis - at an age that you take yourself very seriously, complex but only confused when you don't treat yourself right, smart. Definitely not insane, residing in a creepy alternate universe, and miserably executed like this cretin Brxbrx suggests. 00:29, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
[1]--"Shut up, Brx." 22:31, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
I can understand where Nutty is coming from when he ascribes Papyrus to Ken, but to my mind Ken is a home-brewed Christian font - ones where they replace the 'T' with an oversized cross. Генгисmarauding 23:23, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
Nah, surely Ken is a crayon font, like Mikie's Christmas List, but with reversed e's? Wait scrap that - he's Two Turtle Doves. The pic was a dead giveaway. --PsyGremlinParlez! 23:35, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
Papyrus is actually a very nice face that has its uses. I just chose it because it's so easily abused that it seemed obvious. Psy totally wins. My eyes hurt as much as my brain after reading anything Ken writes. 23:52, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
Brxbrx is best represented by the i and j in this delightful face. 23:58, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
I'm one of those fonts that is so understated and elegant you don't even notice it. Or it could be that I keep typing 'ALT+255' over and over. --Inquisitor (talk) 00:04, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
I did not see either of those fonts coming... I was expecting something more clinical. In the Arial family, probably. Maybe I just have trouble explaining what I'm like. Which I do (Shut up, Brx). Now, for those guys. I don't think Andy is Comic Sans, I can see where you're coming from but I can do one better (I think). He's more Qarmic Sans - it looks like you can just about take it seriously, but when you try to do it you really, really can't - Comic Sans is used enough that I kind of can. Anger Bear, Stencil is fine for him. Takes himself too seriously to realise that the army probably doesn't even use that any more, if they ever in fact used it. Kenny...Kenny boy is one of the image fonts. Wingdings or something. He can type anything in and nobody will be able to tell what the fuck he is on about. Everything just turns to mush the moment he touches it. Terry is a large array of fonts and colours, like all the .net pages he gives more credit than they should be allowed, which is none. Not sure for Ed. Probably something that takes itself far too seriousy and is funny because of it. --Certified Sick Bastard 13:11, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

{reset}. What about Fractur (half the letters look alike, or weird or both). 171.33.222.26 (talk) 14:18, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

Though it's perfectly respectable and continues to be appropriately used as a display face, mostly still in Germany, I avoid considering Fraktur because of its difficult context. "The Fraktur typefaces were particularly heavily used during the time of Nazism, when they were initially represented as true German script, the press scolded for its frequent use of "Roman characters" under "Jewish influence" and German émigrés urged to use only "German script". That's why I chose something based on the ornate script of the day that Gutenberg would have had cut for his letterpress. 16:09, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
$\mathfrak{Nevertheless,\; I'm \;still \; enjoying \;Fraktur:}$sorry for the s my Latin dictionary used Fraktur for the German parts and Antiqua for any Latin (or French etc.) word. I read the classic in my parents' library in Fraktur, and yes, I was annoyed when the FAZ dropped it from her headlines. --larron (talk) 18:08, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
$\mathfrak{It's \;still \; creepy.}$ 19:50, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

@Certified, several hours ago: Ed is a font which only has A, B and C, leaving the rest of the work for someone else to do. 23:33, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

### Wiki Question

Is it possible to create a plug in or utility that can change the font of Talk page renderings based on the signatures? I know I could do it in VBA using the HTML file as input, but that's inelegant. It would add a new dimension of fun to be able to set up a name/font reference in a configuration file, and have talk pages appear that way by default. --DinsdaleP (talk) 16:59, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

Yeah you can do it in pure CSS with CSS3 vendor codes per browser. You could also do it pretty easily in jQuery with simple CSS1 rules. Either method is solely browser side and, at least for RW's purposes, dependent on what's in the font stack on your own computer. If we signed up for a service like Typekit, anyone with javascript turned on would get the fonts we as designers want them to see. 19:55, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

##  Jesus urged the people...

Don't be like liberals.img No doubt it says so in the Conservative Bible. Acei9 00:09, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

But it's liberal denial to deny the quotes in the Bibleimg. He typed that right before the "Don't be like liberals". I can't fathom the depths of stupidity. NorsemanCyser Melomel 02:24, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
If Andy's a parodist, he's a genius. If he's for real, he's a complete moron. Sadly, I think he's for real. --Night Jaguar (talk) 02:30, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

##  From a member of the family that says there is no such thing as marital rape

Apparently Obama is sexistimg for responding in a very restrained way to a heckler. But poor old Sergio makes a racist remark quip and gets scolded for it. andy, I really thought my opinion of you could get no lower but fuck me, you proved me wrong. Oldusgitus (talk) 20:38, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

Looks like it is okay to make racist comments if you're Spanish, but if you're a mixed-race 'muslim' you can't called a woman a 'young lady'. This way beyond double standards. Bevo74 (talk) 20:59, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
I thought calling a 60-year-old woman "young lady" would have been the height of Schlafly chivalry, so I checked Feminism to see what was up. Nothing on young lady, but I did learn that feminists object to other female-only names, such as "temptress." "Young lady" is sexist but "temptress" is good clean fun? Whoover (talk) 21:15, 23 May 2013 (UTC) Update: That was no parodist. Whoover (talk) 21:20, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
That's the best thing about Andy. When you swear he's hit bottom and is scraping up against bedrock... he whips out the diamond-tipped drills and high explosives and keeps right on going. --Inquisitor (talk) 21:47, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
Never mind the bedrock layer, he passed through that ages ago. He's currently hanging around near the outer/inner core interface and still digging. Reckon he can break into the iron ball at the centre of the Earth? --Certified Sick Bastard 22:05, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
Isn't the Earth supposed fo be flat? Sorry, but I can never remember what bollocks creationists are spouting from week to week. ГенгисOur ignorance is God; what we know is science. 23:26, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
Isn't the Earth supposed fo be flat? Typical evolutionist story-telling and misrepresentation. It was in fact revealed in the Bible that the world is round and evolutionists propogated the 'flat earth' idea to ridicule creationists. In fact, science itself comes from a christian worldview and Issac Newton, among others, were creationsits.
Sorry, but I can never remember what bollocks creationists are spouting from week to week. Resort to mockery when you have no argument. Yawn. Acei9 23:31, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
Don't you almost miss the guy? Something bad must have happened that he's no longer penning that epic mash letter of a wiki to his cult leaders. 00:32, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
Andy dug so deep he managed to penetrate the bedrock and fall into the void.--BMcP - Just an astronomy guy 01:30, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
He probably dug straight down in his village and didn't even place any torches, so he takes everyone with him, that noob. NorsemanCyser Melomel 13:16, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
Andy's village is nothing but creeper holes, misshapen half destroyed buildings, and dried up fallow fields, where no torches are allowed because only liberal wimps use them, and is entirely populated by creepers and zombies.--BMcP - Just an astronomy guy 14:23, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

(reset) How many levels below Hell/Tarartus/other equivalents is he? 171.33.222.26 (talk) 14:26, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

Maybe he's hoping he'll go so far down he'll get to heaven from the opposite direction.-- Jabba de Chops 14:46, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
Are you saying that for Andy heaven will be entry from the backside? Генгисmarauding 17:08, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
You git – now I can't get this out of my head.-- Jabba de Chops 18:00, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

##  Main Page Talk

Given that the peons are in open revolt on Main Page Talk every time Andy opens his mouth, how long do you think it will be before Andy relents and starts letting Ken use the Talk Pages again? More importantly, will it be before or after he screws up his Texas job in front of the courts?-- Jabba de Chops 14:55, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

Ken would be finished were Andy a completely gutless and a miserable manager. Ken's also been in open revolt for more than a year now, taking progressively bigger shits on the faiths of nearly all CP admin and just making a shameful mockery of conservatism, christianity, and even his cult of creationism, since he's now become such a hate-filled extremist that he's a christian in name only. I predict Ken will return, first tepidly, then very quickly with greater contempt for every single person he interacts with, and Andy will sit there like a little bitch letting a mentally ill person with the emotional capacity of an infant and the lack of intellectual integrity typical of creationists, which is even gleefully less honest than Andy's brand of reality. 16:14, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
I'm guessing that a parodist will seize upon the opportunity, and start blocking all dissenting voices. --Inquisitor (talk) 17:21, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

##  Dance little man.

Dance for your mastersimg. Oldusgitus (talk) 20:31, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

Those three years flew by fast. What did I miss? --JeevesMkII The gentleman's gentleman at the other site 20:37, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
Kenny is still pushing the graphene-thin charade of anonymity and is still a gibbering idiot. Nothing much else. --Certified Sick Bastard 21:57, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
Since Ken is honest and incapable of telling a lie, I can only assume that Ken has somehow developed time travel. This means what we are reading is from Future Ken. So now that there are two Kens present on this timeline, you can understand his strange usage of personal pronouns. Furthermore don't be surprised when archeologists unearth some ancient stone tablets that begin with the words "Gentlemen..." --Inquisitor (talk) 22:27, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

##  Terry actually starts an article

On ADHD, dismissing it, of course, as all made up. So Ken, without a trace of irony comes along and helps Terry outimg. Oldusgitus (talk) 05:05, 25 May 2013 (UTC)

I hate to say it, but Ken's edits there aren't the worst in the world. It's refreshing to see him do something in mainspace beyond spamming links to his sophomoric essays about flying cats and gay people.--"Shut up, Brx." 05:10, 25 May 2013 (UTC)