Center for Science in the Public Interest

	Potentially edible!; Food woo
	Fabulous food!
	Cat food; Glyphosate; Airborne; Eric Berg; Mediterranean diet;
	Delectable diets!
	Coconut oil; High-fructose corn syrup; Edward Howell; Steve Pavlina;
	Bodacious bods!
	Ephedrine; Urban caveman movement; The Golden One; v - t - e

The Center for Science in the Public Interest (CSPI) is a consumer organization which undertakes research and advocacy programs, as well as providing consumers with information about health and well-being.

In 2010, they won a class-action suit against Coca-Cola, to have their misleading statements regarding Vitamin Water removed.^[1]

Their three main goals are:

“”

To provide useful, objective information to the public and policymakers and to conduct research on food, alcohol, health, the environment, and other issues related to science and technology;
To represent the citizen's interests before regulatory, judicial and legislative bodies on food, alcohol, health, the environment, and other issues; and
To ensure that science and technology are used for the public good and to encourage scientists to engage in public-interest activities.

Food restriction advocacy[edit]

CSPI sees certain food ingredients as harmful, at least in the quantities that they're consumed in the developed world. They advocate government limits on those food ingredients. The three food items they seek limits on most fervently are:

salt;^[2]
sugary drinks, for which they advocate a tax;^[3]^[4] and
trans fat, for which they seek an outright ban.^[5]

CSPI's stance on trans fat represents a reversal of their position from the early 1990s. Before evidence of trans fat's unhealthfulness became available, CSPI advocated replacing the lard and tallow used for frying in fast food restaurants with partially hydrogenated oils, on the grounds of lowering the American intake of saturated fats.^[6]

CSPI has also petitioned the U.S. FDA to ban synthetic food dyes.^[7]^[8] A 2012 meta-analysis concluded that synthetic food dyes may have an effect on ADHD, but that a conclusion could not be drawn due to small sample sizes and publication bias.^[9]

Other food items CSPI has opposed include:

aspartame^[10]
nitrites^[11]
caramel color^[12]
azodicarbonamide,^[13] FoodBabe's infamous yoga mat chemical

External links[edit]

CSPI Homepage
CSPI scam, a site critical of CSPI, run by people with just as big of an axe to grind as CSPI themselves
The Anti-Pleasure Principle, from Reason.com, 1-July-2003

References[edit]

↑ Vitamin water isn't healthy, rules Federal judge
↑ Salt: The Forgotten Killer
↑ "Taxing Soda Could Trim State Deficits (and Waistlines), Says Report". 2010-04-01.
↑ Whether they'll expand their advocacy to a tax on all added sugars, in light of this May 2013 CDC press release which states that "Foods contributed 67% of calories from added sugars compared with 33% from beverages" in adults, remains to be seen.
↑ http://www.cspinet.org/transfat/about.html
↑ Enig, Mary. The Tragic Legacy of Center for Science in the Public Interest. Weston A. Price Foundation: January 6, 2003.
↑ http://www.cspinet.org/fooddyes/
↑ CSPI on food coloring: a pointless warning, examiner.com, 13-May-2014
↑ J.T. Nigg et al., Meta-analysis of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder or attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder symptoms, restriction diet, and synthetic food color additives, Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, vol. 51 no. 1 (January 2012), pp. 86-97
↑ FDA Should Reconsider Aspartame Cancer Risk, Say Experts
↑ Chemical Cuisine: Learn about Food Additives
↑ FDA Urged to Prohibit Carcinogenic "Caramel Coloring"
↑ FDA Should Ban Azodicarbonamide, Says CSPI

[1] Vitamin water isn't healthy, rules Federal judge

[2] Salt: The Forgotten Killer

[3] "Taxing Soda Could Trim State Deficits (and Waistlines), Says Report". 2010-04-01.

[4] Whether they'll expand their advocacy to a tax on all added sugars, in light of this May 2013 CDC press release which states that "Foods contributed 67% of calories from added sugars compared with 33% from beverages" in adults, remains to be seen.

[5] ttp://www.cspinet.org/transfat/about.html

[6] Enig, Mary. The Tragic Legacy of Center for Science in the Public Interest. Weston A. Price Foundation: January 6, 2003.

[7] ttp://www.cspinet.org/fooddyes/

[8] CSPI on food coloring: a pointless warning, examiner.com, 13-May-2014

[9] J.T. Nigg et al., Meta-analysis of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder or attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder symptoms, restriction diet, and synthetic food color additives, Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, vol. 51 no. 1 (January 2012), pp. 86-97

[10] FDA Should Reconsider Aspartame Cancer Risk, Say Experts

[11] Chemical Cuisine: Learn about Food Additives

[12] FDA Urged to Prohibit Carcinogenic "Caramel Coloring"

[13] FDA Should Ban Azodicarbonamide, Says CSPI

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]

[7]

[8]

[9]

[10]

[11]

[12]

[13]

Center for Science in the Public Interest

Food restriction advocacy[edit]

External links[edit]

References[edit]

Navigation menu

Search