Information icon.svg Results are posted for the RationalWiki 2020 Moderator Election.
Thanks to all who participated in the vote, and congratulations to the new moderators!

Devil's advocate

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Warning icon orange.svg This page contains too many unsourced statements and needs to be improved.

Devil's advocate could use some help. Please research the article's assertions. Whatever is credible should be sourced, and what is not should be removed.

We control what
you think with

Icon language.svg
Said and done
Jargon, buzzwords, slogans
Devil's advocate is a phrase often used in the English speaking world. It refers to when, for the sake of debate, a person presents a point of view that they don't necessarily agree with just to make another consider an opposing point of view. In more colloquial terminology, it can refer to when you say something you don't believe to mess with someone, for the sake of it or playful demeaneour. An example of this would be if you were to see an atheist and a Muslim having a debate about whether or not God existed, and you, whatever your own beliefs, argue from a deist standpoint, simply to see their reaction. Another example would be on a mostly pro-choice forum, pretending to be pro-life to try and see how their arguments measure up. This is similar to real-life trolling, but not exactly the same: the person utilizing the devil's advocate usually admits afterwards or in the middle of discussion that they are just playing and is trying to put across an opposing view, and a troll is being simply an asshole who simply wants to be malicious, without revealing their true viewpoints, because a debate isn't their motivation.

The term originally referred to the Roman Catholic cardinal charged with arguing against a potential saint's canonization, before the role was greatly reduced by Pope John Paul II, though the Church does still often seek out opposing counsel during the canonization process.

See also[edit]