Essay talk:Operation Darkwing

Talk it out:

Delete

• ListenerX^TalkerX Ditto. 19:39, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
• ^^^ ENorman (talk) 19:42, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
• Don't give TK any excuse to keep calling us a vandal site. Crundy^{Talk nerdy to me} 19:57, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

Keep

Move to essay namespace. RW wouldn't necessarily be endorsing it there as it is the sole opinion of the editor. Deletion is wholly uncalled for. ^{— Sincerely, Neveruse / Talk / Block} 19:43, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

Essay. ^{I have just eaten} _& stilton^talk 19:49, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

I think that's a good idea. But perhaps with a small note just below the {{essay}} reinforcing that we don't support vandalism? You know, just to err on the safe side. -Redback^G'day 19:51, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

Excellent point. I've removed my delete vote. I say make it an essay. 19:57, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

I was thinking along the same lines and checked the template. I'd prefer it was not specific to vandalism. Just along the lines of... "The views expressed herein are those of <author> and not endorsed by RW..." Something like that. ^{— Sincerely, Neveruse / Talk / Block} 19:58, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

Comments

Doesn't seem much worse than Conservapedia:A Parodist's Guide to Villainy. We have a few such articles strewn about, though not many in recent days. Moving to essay isn't a terrible idea. tmtoulouse 19:47, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

An excellent point. ListenerX^TalkerX 19:52, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

Here is the one I was really looking for Essay:The Information Warrior's Handbook I see that actually all ready been moved. tmtoulouse 20:00, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

This is funny

I had quite the chuckle as I began to see the point of this. Very nice work. ħuman 21:01, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

It took Human to see the humor? One needs to read the entire page... --Irrational Atheist (talk) 21:50, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

I think most of the people above judged this book by its cover. I caught it about 2/3 of the way through, and like any good puzzle, realized at that point how much of what I had already read were clues staring me in the face. But I'm not going to give it away here as others may yet want to find the "hook" on their own. ħuman 22:19, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

Thanks, Human. Usually I can't get you to laugh at all with what I post. This was parody of nearly everything happening on CP. Ken's operations, TK's paranoia that people who were making good edits that seemed too good were parodists, new users coming down hard on stupid things, etc. Even the secret communications at the end! I thought it was too obvious. I was wrong. --Irrational Atheist (talk) 22:34, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

I'm in

See you on the otherside... DeltaStar_{Senior Sysop}^{Speciationspeed!} 23:18, 19 January 2010 (UTC)