Information icon.svg At All things in moderation, we are currently voting on restrictions on the use of LLMs (chatbots) in RationalWiki. Reminder: you need to have at least 75 edits and to have been registered for at least three months to be eligible to vote.

Essay talk:Operation Darkwing

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Talk it out:



Move to essay namespace. RW wouldn't necessarily be endorsing it there as it is the sole opinion of the editor. Deletion is wholly uncalled for. — Sincerely, Neveruse / Talk / Block 19:43, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

Essay. I have just eaten Toast& stiltontalk 19:49, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
I think that's a good idea. But perhaps with a small note just below the {{essay}} reinforcing that we don't support vandalism? You know, just to err on the safe side. -Redbackdemands obedience 19:51, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
Excellent point. I've removed my delete vote. I say make it an essay. User:FineCheesesUser talk:FineCheeses 19:57, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
I was thinking along the same lines and checked the template. I'd prefer it was not specific to vandalism. Just along the lines of... "The views expressed herein are those of <author> and not endorsed by RW..." Something like that. — Sincerely, Neveruse / Talk / Block 19:58, 19 January 2010 (UTC)


Doesn't seem much worse than Conservapedia:A Parodist's Guide to Villainy. We have a few such articles strewn about, though not many in recent days. Moving to essay isn't a terrible idea. tmtoulouse 19:47, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

An excellent point. Mjollnir.svgListenerXTalkerX 19:52, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

Here is the one I was really looking for Essay:The Information Warrior's Handbook I see that actually all ready been moved. tmtoulouse 20:00, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

This is funny[edit]

I had quite the chuckle as I began to see the point of this. Very nice work. ħumanUser talk:Human 21:01, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

It took Human to see the humor? One needs to read the entire page... --Irrational Atheist (talk) 21:50, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
I think most of the people above judged this book by its cover. I caught it about 2/3 of the way through, and like any good puzzle, realized at that point how much of what I had already read were clues staring me in the face. But I'm not going to give it away here as others may yet want to find the "hook" on their own. ħumanUser talk:Human 22:19, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
Thanks, Human. Usually I can't get you to laugh at all with what I post. This was parody of nearly everything happening on CP. Ken's operations, TK's paranoia that people who were making good edits that seemed too good were parodists, new users coming down hard on stupid things, etc. Even the secret communications at the end! I thought it was too obvious. I was wrong. --Irrational Atheist (talk) 22:34, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

I'm in[edit]

See you on the otherside... DeltaStarSenior SysopSpeciationspeed! 23:18, 19 January 2010 (UTC)