There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff – we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity.
If everyone who saw this today donated $5, we would meet our goal for 2019.
| Fighting pseudoscience isn't free.|
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $20 or whatever you can today with !
| The poetry of reality|
|We must know. |
We will know.
|A view from the|
shoulders of giants.
It is generally agreed by scientists that the observable Universe is expanding and expanding at an increasingly rapid rate. This knowledge is based primarily on the observed red shift of distant galaxies. Objects with a higher red shift are moving away from us faster (see Doppler Effect). Edwin Hubble, who first measured the distance to other galaxies, found that almost all galaxies display a red shift and are therefore receding from the Sun, and that galaxies further away display a greater red shift than ones nearby — indicating that the furthest away are receding faster. A common misinterpretation of this is that the Sun (or at least our own galaxy) is the centre of the universe, but this isn't the case; everything is receding away from everything else — like spots drawn onto a balloon as it inflates. A few of the nearest galaxies, such as Andromeda, are moving toward us because local variations may be stronger than the overall expansion effect.
The Big Bang
The expanding Universe is one of the pillars of the Big Bang theory. There is an inverse relationship (known as Hubble's law) between any galaxy's distance and the speed at which it recedes from us. Hubble's law is a linear function, implying that all galaxies (and therefore all visible matter) once occupied the same point.
A Google search reveals numerous websites which purport to explain the observed red shift by invoking the interference of intergalactic gases like molecular hydrogen, and which use this to attack the Big Bang theory. The problem with the intergalactic gas interference explanation is that the frequency-filtering effects of such interference — called interstellar reddening — are very different from a red shift. A red shift lengthens the apparent wavelength of all radiation, including the absorption and emission lines that give each element their fingerprint; interstellar reddening merely reduces the intensity of shorter wavelengths of light, without causing any wavelength shift. It should be noted that the red shift is an observer-dependent phenomenon — observers at different locations will perceive different red shifts for the same object due to differing relative motion, though, if the expanding universe hypothesis is correct, the totality of observations from any point in the universe would point to the same conclusions we arrive at from Earth.
Furthermore, Hubble's Law has been observed to hold true with a high degree of accuracy; given that matter likes to clump together, it's highly unlikely that intergalactic hydrogen is distributed evenly enough to produce these results. An isotropic expansion of space in all directions is by far the simplest explanation for the observations.