Fun talk:New Conservapedia
Any reason why this is in the Fun namespace?--Colonel Sanders (talk) 16:07, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
- Can I take it a step further and ask why is it hear at all? I say get rid of it. --Ψ GremlinFale! 16:17, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
- Yeah, I agree. And I just did.--Colonel Sanders (talk) 16:20, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
- A bit quick perhaps. There are a lot of strange things in fun and it's not as if they do any harm here.--BobSpring is sprung! 16:31, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
- Yes, I see. Perhaps I should just restore it?--Colonel Sanders (talk) 16:33, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
- Ah, was this one of those "Remember, pillage BEFORE you burn!" moments? --Ψ GremlinSermā! 16:34, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
- Perhaps. But, I know you don't like it and I particularly don't either. But maybe Bob is right. Is it really doing harm? This is an article that needs to get deleted. A lot of fun articles like this really don't hurt anything. Meh.--Colonel Sanders (talk) 16:38, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
- Personally I'd restore it. We don't actually have any criteria for "Fun" as far as I'm aware. At first it was just a dumping ground for articles which just didn't make the grade or were pointless (but under the name ACD). Later it was renamed to "fun" and people started to think that things in "fun" had to be "funny", but that was never the original intention. It's an article graveyard really - though with some really funny stuff just to confuse the issue.--BobSpring is sprung! 16:40, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks for clearing the issue on the "Fun" namespace, Bob! I restored the article and will give mercy to the other I linked to.--Colonel Sanders (talk) 16:44, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
- Personally I'd restore it. We don't actually have any criteria for "Fun" as far as I'm aware. At first it was just a dumping ground for articles which just didn't make the grade or were pointless (but under the name ACD). Later it was renamed to "fun" and people started to think that things in "fun" had to be "funny", but that was never the original intention. It's an article graveyard really - though with some really funny stuff just to confuse the issue.--BobSpring is sprung! 16:40, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
- Perhaps. But, I know you don't like it and I particularly don't either. But maybe Bob is right. Is it really doing harm? This is an article that needs to get deleted. A lot of fun articles like this really don't hurt anything. Meh.--Colonel Sanders (talk) 16:38, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
- Ah, was this one of those "Remember, pillage BEFORE you burn!" moments? --Ψ GremlinSermā! 16:34, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
- Yes, I see. Perhaps I should just restore it?--Colonel Sanders (talk) 16:33, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
- A bit quick perhaps. There are a lot of strange things in fun and it's not as if they do any harm here.--BobSpring is sprung! 16:31, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
- Yeah, I agree. And I just did.--Colonel Sanders (talk) 16:20, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
Dead[edit]
This insignificant site is sadly among the dead (with Liberapedia, Libertapedia, EvoWiki among others). Do we need this article anymore?--Colonel Sanders (talk) 22:57, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
YES![edit]
Holy crap! This looks awesome! Can I add some Poe's Law-esque articles on it? ...Damn I need a life.Moderateman3345 (talk) 03:26, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
Where'd it go?[edit]
The site appears to be down, main page deleted, can't view any other pages or navigate the site. Wikkii.com is not down. I take it the joke got old fast? Secret Squirrel (talk) 12:46, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
- It moved back to its old server here. User:Mr. Berty crashed the Wikkii site.--Colonel Sanders (talk) 01:02, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
- Ah, thanks :" Lol Secret Squirrel (talk) 21:38, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
- Although parodying Ken, as I've figured out, just cannot be done. Secret Squirrel (talk) 01:30, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
I remember these guys![edit]
I'm one of the unofficial community staff over at Wikkii, and there was drama on our support forum because one of the bureaucrats there went rouge and closed down the Conservapedia wiki there. (He couldn't delete it, but set it so no one but administrators can access it.) Inquisitor Ehrenstein (talk) 22:40, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
- Went rouge? ГенгисRationalWiki GOLD member 18:36, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
Parody?[edit]
Is this actually a parody? It's hard to tell these things sometimes; you can never know whether people are serious just by them being extreme. It looks like maybe it might actually be a parody. I believe I saw one of their admins here, so probably isn't real. Inquisitor Sasha Ehrenstein des Sturmkrieg Sector (talk) 23:53, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
Alive?[edit]
I think this site is editing again. Not sure.--Seonookim (talk) 05:05, 27 February 2013 (UTC)