RationalWiki's 2019 Fundraiser

There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff – we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity.

If everyone who saw this today donated $5, we would meet our goal for 2019.

Fighting pseudoscience isn't free.
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $20 or whatever you can today with PayPal Logo.png!

Donations so far: $3680Goal: $6000

George Osborne

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
A guide to
U.K. Politics
Icon politics UK.svg
God Save the Queen?

George Gideon Oliver Osborne is a member of the Conservative Party, serving as Chancellor of the Exchequer from 2010 through 2016. A blue blood, he's the heir apparent to the Osborne baronetcy and a descendant of the Anglo-Irish aristocracy, known in Ireland as the Ascendancy. He was sacked as Chancellor by Prime Minister Theresa May.


He gained notability for running David Cameron's campaign for party leadership; he became Shadow Chancellor while the Tories were in opposition versus New Labour. As Chancellor, Osborne is responsible for the economy of the United Kingdom, and is personally responsible for the neoliberal budget cuts to social spending and hiking of taxes to the workers. Namely, he derided stay-at-home mums for their "lifestyle choice" and punished them by denying them tax breaks that working mothers will get.


George reached some level of intrigue in 2014 when it was revealed that evidence of his brother Adam's conversion to Islam and marriage to a Bangladeshi Muslim in 2009 was removed from European Google searches through the "Right to be Forgotten" law.[1][2]

He is currently in the shitter with a great many Britons, and large parts of the media - including the hitherto-friendly Sun - for announcing and insisting quite forcefully on the necessity of direct cuts to working and child tax credits. These are state benefits paid as a form of top-up wage principally to low-paid working people, so cuts to or restrictions on these directly hurt the poor and low-paid disproportionately - even those who are doing what would otherwise be considered the "right thing" and working for low wages rather than just remaining unemployed and therefore taking other state benefits. Indeed, the plans are such that a low paid person on tax credits that took on more hours or otherwise earned more money would effectively lose more than half of their additional earnings due to a faster withdrawal rate of tax credits. To add insult to injury, David Cameron was specifically asked about the potential for tax credit cuts and gave a categorical denial that they would be cut, making this an astonishingly bare-faced lie by any standard.[3]