RationalWiki's 2018 Fundraiser

There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff — we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity.

If everyone seeing this today donates $5, we will meet our goal for 2018.

Fighting pseudoscience isn't free.
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $20 or whatever you can today with PayPal Logo.png!

Donations so far: $2951Goal: $5000

Judy Blume

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Judy Blume, 2009.
Great and terrible
Icon books.svg
On our shelf:
We're so glad you came
Icon sex.svg
Reach around the subject
Gay sign.png

Judy Blume (born 1938) is an American author of fiction for children and young adults. Her works are frequently attacked[1] for their frank discussion of such taboo topics as masturbation,[2] premarital sex,[3] and menstruation.[4]

Blume has described how censorship was almost nonexistent at one point in her career, but the American election of 1980 and the rise of the Moral Majority changed matters:

Of course, they couldn't keep the occasional anecdote from reaching me: the mother who admitted she'd cut two pages out of Then Again, Maybe I Won't rather than allow her almost thirteen-year-old son to read about wet dreams. Or the young librarian who'd been instructed by her male principal to keep Deenie off the shelf because in the book, Deenie masturbates. "It would be different if it were about a boy," he'd told her. "That would be normal."

The stories go on and on but really, I wasn't that concerned. There was no organized effort to ban my books or any other books, none that I knew of, anyway...

Then, almost overnight, following the presidential election of 1980, the censors crawled out of the woodwork, organized and determined. Not only would they decide what their children could read but what all children could read. It was the beginning of the decade that wouldn't go away, that still won't go away almost twenty years later. Suddenly books were seen as dangerous to young minds. Thinking was seen as dangerous, unless those thoughts were approved by groups like the Moral Majority, who believed with certainty they knew what was best for everyone.[5]

Following her experiences with censorship, Blume has become a noted opponent of book-banning, arguing that censorship sends the message that "books are dangerous, there's something in this book we don't want you to know."[6] Her situation is arguably another example of the Streisand effect, winning 90 literary awards since.