| Check our privilege|
|Not ALL of our articles|
Person-first language is
a wonderful way to ensure inclusion, freedom, and respect for persons with handicapableness the latest in the lineup of politically correct ways to patronize the disabled.
How it works
When referring to disabled people, with specific regard to their disability, one is supposed to preface any mention of said disability with the mention of the fact that they are people, and also not mention that they are actually disabled.
By this logic, there are two things wrong with the statement, "X is blind":
- It makes no mention of X's humanity, reducing him to his blindness. Modify: "X is a person with blindness."
- But this is still problematic since it harps on what is wrong with X, similar to how a person who cannot carry a tune in a bucket might harp on about not being a prima donna. Modify: "X is a person who sees with a dog and a white cane."
Examples of PFL
Some more substitutions:
|Original version||Person-first version|
|X is batshit crazy.||X is a person showing symptoms of a cognitive or psychotic disorder.|
|X is quadriplegic.||X is a person who has been diagnosed with a physical disability.|
|X is non-verbal.||X is a person who communicates using a speech synthesizer.|
|X is brain-damaged.||X is a person who has a brain injury.|
|X is black.||X is a person of color.|
|X is gay.||X is a person whose primary sexual attraction is towards people of the same sex.|
|X is smart.||X is a person whose intelligence is significantly above that of the general population|
|X is a woo-meister.||X is a person who communicates using his large intestine.|
Who cares and who doesn't
Everybody is horrified at how disabled people are dehumanized by putting the name of their disability before the word "person" in a sentence — except, of course, for physically disabled people themselves. The National Federation of the Blind has strongly rejected person-first language, as have the deaf community. Many autistic people  also reject person-first language, but this is not always the case. People with mental disabilities do usually prefer person-first language: "For many people, using the following term "a person with a mental health challenge" is less threatening and more accepted. Some people prefer "a person with mental health life experiences". And some people prefer "a person with a mental health diagnosis" or "a person with a mental health disability". Others prefer "a person with a psychiatric disability" or "a person with lived experience". You should always ask what a person prefers first. Each person makes their own choice about how they want to self identify. When in doubt call the person by their name. Those last two sentences probably are the most sensible approach anyway.
One of the reasons those who don't like person-first language give is that saying "person with Y" carries the implication that Y is something bad or undesirable, while many disabled people do not view Y quite so much that way. After all, "person first language" is employed only with disabilities; while "blind person" is reworded as "person with blindness" (or "person with sight impairment"), no one refers to a gay person as "person with gayness" (and using such language would probably be interpreted as being very anti-gay). Besides, just saying Y saves words!
- People First Language Poster
- As Dave Barry would say, I am not making this one up. Political correctness often means ambiguity, especially in the phenomenon known as the euphemism treadmill.
- Deaf Culture, PEPN tipsheet
- An Introductory Guide to Disability Language and Empowerment