There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with ![]() ![]() |
RationalWiki:Articles for deletion/Glenn Greenwald
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Glenn Greenwald | Result: Keep[edit]
Delete[edit]
- Why do we have this articulo? Worzelpete (talk) 22:23, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Keep[edit]
- I think there is little wrong with this article. Applesauce (talk) 04:39, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
- Glenn is very important. Keep! AnonASP (talk) 04:48, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
Reverend Black Percy (talk) 05:01, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
- Definitely keep. B) talk 04:49, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
- Why? —€h33s3βurg3rF@€3
(talk • stalk) 04:54, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
Merge/redirect[edit]
Goat[edit]
- Seems missional, but could use a rewrite. I'm sympathetic to both arguments. RoninMacbeth (talk) 20:52, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
- The first sentence is awkward and is a run-on sentence which is awkwardly phrased and is in fact an English teacher's nightmare, which also may give me nightmares, which is a fact you may not care about but which has prompted me to decide to rewrite it. Heh. In all seriousness, it seems a well-referenced article on an important topic. But I am going to work on rewriting and rephrasing it. Feel free to help. B) talk 05:01, 26 November 2016 (UTC)