There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with ![]() ![]() |
RationalWiki:Articles for deletion/John Pack Lambert
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
John Pack Lambert | Result: Deleted[edit]
Keep[edit]
Delete[edit]
- Article subject has raise concerns bout accuracy of main points of the article, and the citations do not bear them out directly Ikanreed (talk) 19:25, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
- All of the above reasons, plus the article is on some guy whose claim to fame is EDITING WIKIPEDIA, fer Christ's sake. Peace. AgingHippie (talk) 19:47, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
- Agree with both the above. Assuming, for the purpose of argument only, that everything in the article is true and could be supported - what, exactly, has this guy done to deserve a personal attack? ProblemChimp (talk) 20:02, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
- Wėąṣėḷőįď
Methinks it is a Weasel 20:10, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
- Appears not to be true. Wack it. --Castaigne (talk) 20:18, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
- I too have an opinion! Trick (talk) 20:19, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
- (EC)Seems like a Wiki grudge. He seems to have issues with women that got the notice of a NY Times blogger (also some odd "anti-white" comments mixed in), attempts to whitewash LDS stuff on Wikipedia, and is OCD about catagories...but hasn't done much of anything of any note. Certainly doesn't seem islamaphobic. -EmeraldCityWanderer (talk) 20:26, 30 January 2015 (UTC)