There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with ![]() ![]() |
RationalWiki:Articles for deletion/Vote of No-Confidence
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Vote of No-Confidence | Result: Deleted[edit]
Delete[edit]
- Not an encylopedia Mʀ. Wʜɪsᴋᴇʀs, Esϙᴜɪʀᴇ (talk/stalk) 22:01, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
- Agreed.—チーズバーガー • めん
(talk • stalk) 22:05, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
- -DιαμοπdDιςc1(talk) 16:49, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
- As much as I hate to see PoliSci articles go, we're not an encyclopedia. RoninMacbeth (talk) 16:51, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
Keep[edit]
- We could discuss the difference between various procedures and compare and contrast with impeachment in the US Evil Zionist (talk) 22:22, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
- How's this missional?—チーズバーガー • めん
(talk • stalk) 16:54, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
- Dispelling American Exceptionalist myths? Exploring alternative constitutional arrangements? Evil Zionist (talk) 00:44, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
- How's this missional?—チーズバーガー • めん