There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with ![]() ![]() |
User contributions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
- 16:48, 7 January 2012 diff hist +432 Conservapedia talk:What is going on at CP? →Conservapedia_talk:What_is_going_on_at_CP%3F/Archive217#Andy_Schlafly.2C_two_time_loser_with_recall
- 15:41, 7 January 2012 diff hist +21 RationalWiki:Saloon bar →Conservapedia_talk:What_is_going_on_at_CP%3F/Archive217#Andy_Schlafly.2C_two_time_loser_with_recall
- 15:41, 7 January 2012 diff hist +170 RationalWiki:Saloon bar →Conservapedia_talk:What_is_going_on_at_CP%3F/Archive217#Andy_Schlafly.2C_two_time_loser_with_recall
- 15:33, 7 January 2012 diff hist -38 RationalWiki:Saloon bar →Conservapedia_talk:What_is_going_on_at_CP%3F/Archive217#Andy_Schlafly.2C_two_time_loser_with_recall
- 15:29, 7 January 2012 diff hist +290 RationalWiki:Saloon bar →Conservapedia_talk:What_is_going_on_at_CP%3F/Archive217#Andy_Schlafly.2C_two_time_loser_with_recall: new section
- 10:10, 26 January 2011 diff hist +244 N User:Aconite Created page with 'I can't contribute to a site that thinks this is acceptable standards of b...' current
- 17:22, 20 January 2011 diff hist +224 User talk:PolarBearInTheJungle →Thread: new section
- 17:18, 20 January 2011 diff hist +3,334 Conservapedia talk:What is going on at CP? Undo revision 717566 by Leotardo (talk) No, seriously, this thread should never have started. Here's why.
- 17:06, 20 January 2011 diff hist -9,154 Conservapedia talk:What is going on at CP? →Andy Schlafly, two time loser with recall: That's it, I'm shutting this down.
- 16:59, 20 January 2011 diff hist +47 Talk:Citizendium →Sanger's community genius goes back a long way
- 16:59, 20 January 2011 diff hist +260 Talk:Citizendium →Sanger's community genius goes back a long way
- 15:49, 20 January 2011 diff hist -12 Citizendium →Why Wikipedia wins: I think it had potential as a competitor at the start, but you are right - it as theoretical. Edit made: "to ever gain a position" -> "to ever become".
- 15:45, 20 January 2011 diff hist +107 RationalWiki talk:Nothing is going on at Citizendium →Review: Citizendium and copyright
- 15:40, 20 January 2011 diff hist +1,101 Talk:Citizendium →Moving forwards
- 11:36, 20 January 2011 diff hist +754 Talk:Citizendium →Moving forwards: new section
- 09:22, 20 January 2011 diff hist +201 RationalWiki talk:Nothing is going on at Citizendium →A bit too old news for WIGO, probably...
- 07:10, 20 January 2011 diff hist +755 Citizendium →The concept of expertise on Citizendium: I think that says it all
- 07:01, 20 January 2011 diff hist +2 Citizendium →Attracting and repelling academia: Ce
- 06:57, 20 January 2011 diff hist +96 RationalWiki talk:Nothing is going on at Citizendium →A bit too old news for WIGO, probably...
- 06:55, 20 January 2011 diff hist +38 RationalWiki talk:Nothing is going on at Citizendium →A bit too old news for WIGO, probably...
- 06:51, 20 January 2011 diff hist +1,605 RationalWiki talk:Nothing is going on at Citizendium →A bit too old news for WIGO, probably...
- 06:16, 20 January 2011 diff hist +405 Citizendium →Rearranging the deckchairs: Make tenses consistent, add placeholder for a paragraph we need to write, but which it's just too soon to attempt.
- 06:01, 20 January 2011 diff hist +335 Citizendium →Why Wikipedia wins: Sum up.
- 05:52, 20 January 2011 diff hist +136 Citizendium →Why Wikipedia wins: CE
- 05:47, 20 January 2011 diff hist -86 Citizendium →Why Wikipedia wins: I don't think we should bash Wikipedia just because we're talking about the competition between them. Make introduction a ''lot'' gentler.
- 01:39, 20 January 2011 diff hist +110 Citizendium →Citizendium's greatest pseudoscientific hits: conclude-> concludes
- 22:52, 19 January 2011 diff hist -48 RationalWiki:What is going on in the world? →January 2011: Eh, don'tr explain the joke
- 22:50, 19 January 2011 diff hist +47 RationalWiki:What is going on in the world? →January 2011
- 22:34, 19 January 2011 diff hist +22 RationalWiki talk:Nothing is going on at Citizendium →Review: Citizendium and copyright
- 22:33, 19 January 2011 diff hist +197 RationalWiki talk:Nothing is going on at Citizendium →Review: Citizendium and copyright
- 15:22, 19 January 2011 diff hist +98 RationalWiki talk:What is going on in the world? →Vatican letter WIGO
- 15:19, 19 January 2011 diff hist +1 RationalWiki talk:What is going on in the world? →Vatican letter WIGO
- 15:17, 19 January 2011 diff hist +240 RationalWiki talk:What is going on in the world? →Vatican letter WIGO
- 15:00, 19 January 2011 diff hist +143 Talk:Dana Ullman →MPH
- 14:54, 19 January 2011 diff hist +545 Citizendium →Rearranging the deckchairs: Merge material cut from elsewhere.
- 14:48, 19 January 2011 diff hist -708 Citizendium →Citizendium's greatest pseudoscientific hits: Redundant to "rearranging the deck chairs". Merging in some content there
- 14:46, 19 January 2011 diff hist 0 Citizendium →Rearranging the deckchairs: "Further" isn't really the word, is it?
- 14:46, 19 January 2011 diff hist +77 Citizendium →Rearranging the deckchairs: Copyedit.
- 14:43, 19 January 2011 diff hist +248 Talk:Citizendium →Citizendium#Citizendium's greatest pseudoscientific hits
- 14:41, 19 January 2011 diff hist +200 Talk:Citizendium
- 14:38, 19 January 2011 diff hist -1,610 Citizendium →Citizendium's greatest pseudoscientific hits: I've moved Intelligent design to the Sanger section - we have a bit about Sanger saying Citizendium is neutral on ID, so it fits there; cut the rest
- 14:36, 19 January 2011 diff hist +417 Citizendium →Attracting and repelling academia: Moving this here, because I'm trying to get rid of some of the historical stuff in the pseudoscientific hits section
- 14:29, 19 January 2011 diff hist -9 Citizendium →Rearranging the deckchairs: Intelligent design now fixed
- 14:27, 19 January 2011 diff hist +8 Citizendium →Citizendium's greatest pseudoscientific hits: Commenting out Apollo moon landing, as I don't think it adds much to what we have, and is old enough to not be that relevant. S
- 14:24, 19 January 2011 diff hist +34 Citizendium →Citizendium's greatest pseudoscientific hits: Bring up to date.
- 14:21, 19 January 2011 diff hist -795 Citizendium →Citizendium's greatest pseudoscientific hits: Remove protoscience, as, frankly, it's been 4 years; and it was one paragraph.
- 14:19, 19 January 2011 diff hist +773 User talk:Howard C. Berkowitz →http://en.citizendium.org/wiki/Shang_reviews_of_homeopathy
- 14:13, 19 January 2011 diff hist -104 Citizendium →Citizendium's greatest pseudoscientific hits: Already covered
- 14:10, 19 January 2011 diff hist +105 User talk:Howard C. Berkowitz →http://en.citizendium.org/wiki/Shang_reviews_of_homeopathy
- 14:09, 19 January 2011 diff hist -492 Citizendium →Citizendium's greatest pseudoscientific hits: Removing this for now; evidently got shuffled out in an attempt to clean up homeopathy, and never got touched. CZ deserves benefit of the doubt.