Conservapedia talk:What is going on at CP?

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search

What is going on?

(talk) (talk) (talk) (talk) (*cough*) (hic)

As a point of etiquette, please use the [add section] tab above, or the "Add new section" link below, when adding a new topic, and the appropriate [edit] tab when commenting on existing topics. This will lessen the incidence of edit conflicts. Thank you.

When adding a link to Conservapedia that is not already on What is going on at CP? please place <capture></capture> around the link.

Archives for this talk page: Archive list (new)

I am super curious[edit]

As to the percentage of women editors at Conservapedia. My guess is somewhere between zero and one percent--"Shut up, Brx." 18:58, 6 December 2019 (UTC)

Jesus Brx is back. AceModerator 19:26, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
Honestly, I don't think there's been a woman on CP since Jallen, HSMom and *cough* Jessica. RoundeTheeHorne (talk) 08:28, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
Maybe one of the mysterious internet ninja collective known as User:Conservative is a woman. I can just see Ken, all Norman Bates on a Friday night for that special kind of online. LondonGrump (talk) 16:42, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
This is one of those "liberals are hypocritical" points that CP loves to make. They don't think women are qualified editors, but we do. So unless 50% of WP editors are female, they think they've got us, even though 1% of CP editors are. Same thing as "lack of diversity in Democratic primary." They don't expect any Republican candidates who aren't white men, but so what? It's still a left fail. Logic is not your friend when trying to grok their world. Whoover (talk) 02:20, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

Tension in Iran is the fault of Trump's warmongering or and a brutal Middle Eastern regime. liberals.[edit]

[1] I knew somehow liberals would be to blame.--Mercian (talk) 20:52, 9 January 2020 (UTC)

What kind of pretzel logic is this? From what it looks like, it seems like "liberals" (the Democrats), who were the ones strongly condemning Trump, pissed off Iran (who were also strongly condemning Trump) and made Iran take down a Ukraine airplane? --It's-a me, Lgm sigpic.png LeftyGreenMario!(Mod) 21:02, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
What do you expect from a website that considers The Joker "the best of the public" while condemning it as "role-playing atheistic violence by white men."? LondonGrump (talk) 09:24, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
As has been very well said before, the gist of Conservapedia is that everything bad that has ever happened was because of liberalism.Spud (talk) 14:05, 10 January 2020 (UTC)

So Ken has never ate bacon, lobster or prawn.[edit]

[2] Or more likely he picks and chooses the parts of the Bible he wishes to follow. Do you eat pork products or any other food on the list Ken? I would say deny this and lose all credibility buy any he had was lost years ago.--Mercian (talk) 01:37, 27 January 2020 (UTC)

No, Christian Americans don't eat pork. Only atheists in China and Europe. Whoover (talk) 07:39, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
I got a question: What is artificial crab? Crab meat made with polymers? nobsFree Roger Stone! 07:50, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
A few words posting here and he goes on a spree, gloating that people are dying from a very nasty virus. Atheists die in China, Kids are murdered in Norway and Manchester, "Olé! Olé! Olé!, checkmate atheists". Although he is a genuinely nasty bastard it is so easy to pluck his strings, no sport though, like Liverpool playing their first team against Forest Green Rovers reserves.--Mercian (talk) 14:10, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
[3] No anger from me mate, more like a mix of amusement, disgust and perhaps a little bit of pity.--Mercian (talk) 14:53, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
PS America does not need to import Muslims to commit atrocities. As has been seen, over and over, you have enough of your own citizens to do that for you.--Mercian (talk) 15:02, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
Hmmm, sounds like a racist statement. Just because the majority of black gun deaths are black-on-black homicides, is that cause to restrict black gun ownership rights? nobsFree Roger Stone! 15:40, 28 January 2020 (UTC
A Conservapedian accusing me of racism? The majority of mass murders that have made the UK news were done by white people.--Mercian (talk) 17:33, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
There you go - evidence of cp:liberal media bias. nobsFree Roger Stone! 18:56, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
My mistake, Sandy Hook, Aurora, Vegas, Orlando, Columbine, Parkland etc were all carried about by black people, it's just liberal media bias pretended they were not.--Mercian (talk) 20:23, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
I see. We have "gun violence" confused with "mass shooting". A common error, I suppose. nobsFree Roger Stone! 21:22, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
On your part, at no point did I mention gun violence or mass shooting.--Mercian (talk) 23:08, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
Pardon me? You took the leap from Americans committing atrocities to mass shootings; I specifically referenced the black-on-black homicide rate. A single murder of any individual is an atrocity, wouldn't you agree? nobsFree Roger Stone! 23:26, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
I think you misread him. "He cannot defend the notion that importing Muslims ... is not going to be a causal factor for violence." Sounds like you're good. Whoover (talk) 00:27, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
"Importing Muslims," WTF?!! He's making Muslims out to be like some kind of commodity, that's extremely dehumanizing. Oxyaena Harass 01:02, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
"you have enough of your own citizens to do that [commit atrocities]." Many if not most (to use a Slimvirginism) Americans could interpret this as a reference to black-on-black violence. nobsFree Roger Stone! 00:57, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
Artificial crab is usually made from white fish (e.g. pollock) and red food coloring. Mmmm![4] --Annanoon (talk) 16:01, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
No polymers? Thank God. I was fearful that eating artificial crab left a carbon footprint. nobsFree Roger Stone! 17:08, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
[5] I admit that eating live rodents is disgusting but nowhere near as disgusting as murdering young people because they disagree with you politically. Personally I would rather eat rodents for the rest of my life than kill one single person but Mr Conservative glorifies in killing kids and even post Oles when it does happen. When will he admit that killing children is disgusting? Never because he agrees and applauds the concept.--Mercian (talk) 08:57, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
[6] At no point in that little tirade did you deny that you glorify in the murder of children. You dirty pro child-murder scumbag.I think I will be let it known around the net that Conservapedia's propaganda chief, any by extension the website and Schalfly are pro child murder. Deny it all you want but the evidence is clear. It is my assumption that you get sexual pleasure out of it. Pervert.--Mercian (talk) 14:22, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
He says "I take no pleasure in teenage girls being enamored with the work of the liberal/feminist Ariana Grande." But you do take pleasure in them dying don't you you murderous (by proxy) scumbag. "Fred Phelps is dead, long live his successor"--Mercian (talk) 08:57, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
[7] I do not exchange messages with supporters and sympathisers of Islamic Terrorists. What ever crap you come up with does not disguise that fact. You support Jihad, So Jihadi Ken, Fuck Off.--Mercian (talk) 15:12, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
"Why Mercian and likeminded pro-Muslim immigration Brits are responsible for the Manchester Arena Bombing"
That Sir, is libel. When Alex Jones expressed similar views on Sandy Hook the lawsuit almost ruined him, and I am guessing he is a man of vastly more resources than you.--Mercian (talk) 19:48, 31 January 2020 (UTC)

Such a saddo of a "man", answering queries dated 2011 and 2013[8] Deny you are a saddo and lose all credibility.--Mercian (talk) 14:46, 17 February 2020 (UTC)

Cromwell[edit]

That's a weird one. He starts off kinda ok, with Oliver, but then somehow slides back 200 years, to Thomas. He does know there's 2 Cromwells, right? And not one that had Noah's life expectancy. RoundeTheeHorne (talk) 04:47, 21 February 2020 (UTC)

Kinda OK with Oliver? That's jumping forwards 100 years. They're lost the moment they stray outside their little bubble of ideas. LondonGrump (talk) 10:03, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
He does actually start OK, which makes it even more bizarre. In the full diff, he correctly associates Olly (1599-1658) with Charles I, but then drunkenly staggers back in time to Henry VIII (1491-1597) and ends up passing out in a pool of crazy history vomit with the War of the Roses (1455-1487). There's not even any overlap between the things he's conflating. Helena Bonham Carter (talk) 16:06, 21 February 2020 (UTC)

A little math lesson for Nobs[edit]

Nobs made the... fascinating claim that Bloomberg spent $500 million on his Presidential campaign. Therefore, he could have given a million dollars to each of 327 million Americans, and had money left over.

One million dollars multiplied by 327 million is 327 trillion dollars. Just for purpose of comparison, the entire US Federal budget for 2019 is about 4.4 trillion. The net worth of Apple, the most valuable company in existence, is $1.3 trillion. An exact definition of "all the money in the world" is difficult come by, much less an amount, but if you define it as coins, currency, and money in traditional bank accounts and other easily accessible funds, it's around $90.4 trillion. So, you are suggesting that Bloomberg literally has access to all the money in the world.

And even if it was possible to give every American man, woman and child a million dollars, the result would be instantaneous, ruinous inflation -- you'd have a million dollars, but it might buy you a cup of coffee. And I mean cheap gas station coffee, not good stuff from Starbucks.

The only people that would benefit from such an event are debtors. If I owe $50K on my mortgage, and I suddenly get a million bucks, I can pay off the mortgage for $50K, even if that $50K is worth a tiny fraction of what it was when I signed the mortgage papers. The bank's not happy, but hey, sucks to be them.

If Bloomberg did decide to just divide up the $500 million between 327 million Americans, that's about a buck fifty each. There's that cheap gas station coffee again. (Will $1.50 get you a coffee at a gas station? I don't drink coffee, so I don't know.)

I don't dispute the Bloomberg spent a lot of money for very little benefit, but really, Rob, this is basic math, elementary or middle school level stuff. It's not calculus or even algebra.

MDB (the MD used to be for Maryland, but now means Magically Deliciousthe B is still for Bear) 14:21, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

His MPR entry is sufficiently badly written that yours is a reasonable inference absent any other background knowledge. Unfortunately, if you check the linked video, he's referencing an on-air maths flub on MSNBC that was widely mocked in right-wing circles.
Rob's probably stupid enough to have swallowed the claim uncritically if, say, uttered by Trump, but I reckon he's too plugged in to that media ecosphere to have been unaware of the context in this case. Helena Bonham Carter (talk) 15:38, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
Funny thing is, if nobs were to come in and say 'Sorry guys, I made a mistake, mea culpa' like a goddamned human being that would be it and it'd be done. But no, his reply would have to involve George Soros and some Clinton Chronicles bullshit and a loop back to Burisma and try to prove that in fact, if you just tally up all the lost labor that would have been performed by aborted fetuses if there had been no Roe v. Wade, and had we experienced the 75% growth rate that would have been generated by a McCain-Palin adminstration, it in fact comes out to MORE than $1 million per American, nanny nanny boo boo. There would also be some shitty things said about undocumented immigrants, but I'm not 100% where they'd fit in the diatribe, so I left them in reserve. Semipenultimate (talk) 23:58, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
Sorry guys, I assumed readers could read and do math, especially since the direct quote was attributed to MSNBC without editorial comment. My mistake. Not to be outdone, MSNBC doubles down CCP propaganda. One former Obama official says of Obama's former head of Obamacare "I don't have time for bullshit people." nobsFree Roger Stone! 00:40, 20 March 2020 (UTC)

Conservapedia humour[edit]

A certain amount of (presumably) unintended humour can be found by reading the MP list of 'popular articles' across and downwards - on the current listing have 'Hollywood values/Holy Spirit', 'Benefits of capitalism/Romantic paintings', 'double standard/Obamagate timeline', 'Donald Trump/Nihilism', 'Mystery: Does God Have a Sense of Humor/Causes of Homosexuality'. Anna Livia (talk) 15:56, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

The Wizard of Oz/Counterexamples to evolution', 'Presidential Election 2020/ex-homosexuals', 'Satanism/Romantic paintings' and 'Immigration/Greatest Conservative sports stars'. Anna Livia (talk) 17:59, 9 March 2020 (UTC)

Conservapedia continues to blame atheism for Corona19.[edit]

And yet their dear/great/supreme leader Andy is against vaccines and basic human cleanliness, washing hands to prevent spread of disease is if remember rightly, liberal claptrap. Follow Conservapedia's guidelines we will all be dead within the year. America also has the unclean and unsanitary procedure of using chlorine in certain meat products as their food standards are far below standard. --Mercian (talk) 05:30, 10 March 2020 (UTC)

Disease is punishment from God for sin. People only die from diseases if they don't believe in Jesus hard enough. --47.146.63.87 (talk) 06:16, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Is it me, or is the US not taking Coronavirus as seriously as everyone else? How will the health care system support everyone if not everyone can pay? Why would many people go to be tested if they have to pay for the test? Perhaps one of our colonial colleagues can say. Conservapedia ain't telling... LondonGrump (talk) 07:00, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Putting Pence in charge of the government's response should've been a pretty clear indication. Remember, Republicans think that if it won't happen to them, it doesn't matter (luckily the CPAC outbreak will change that), and I'm guessing that Trump is hoping that a) it spreads in the traditionally Blue urban areas and b) lasts until November, so he can postpone the election. These people might be incompetent, but they'd not dumb. RoundeTheeHorne (talk) 11:59, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Back to Andy. I think the best option is for the powers that be send him a sample of the virus so he can test it himself at home to ensure it is an atheist problem and the personal hygiene recommended by medical professionals is a strategy to shut down the voice of Conservatives. If they do not do so they are Liberal Nazis employing liberal censorship techniques to deceive the world. In the meantime he will have his Minister of Propaganda whom the deaths of those on 9/11 are firmly his fault and who has expressed that the death of liberal unionised fire fighters was a good thing, to spurt out some bollocks about the dietary practices of atheists, atheist hospitals, atheism and medicine and atheism and health. Meanwhile, due to his expertise on the subject Andy will mishandle the sample and the whole 90 million people or so who live in the DC-Boston belt will be quarantined. He will then declare on his deathbed that it was not a hoax but a liberal plot to kill everybody in the world.--Mercian (talk) 17:53, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
PS, It is largely an atheist liberal elite problem and there is proof of this. In Italy it is the more liberal and secular north of the country that has the worse of it where the more conservative and religious south of Italy has it bad but not so much so.--Mercian (talk) 18:06, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
You're seeing the conspiracy nuttery about it being a Chinese bioweapon? Like a lot of conspiracy theories it's wish fulfillment and psychological reassurance. It's not a natural disaster that cares not one whit whether you're rich or poor; it's Bad People who want to hurt us. We don't have to change society to be more equitable, help everyone, take collective action against collective threats. We have to find and crush the Bad People. Bad Things don't happen to Good People, except when caused by Bad People. --47.146.63.87 (talk) 09:03, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Since someone apparently objected to my last comment, no sarcasm. Actually most countries seem to be whistling past the graveyard. A "serious" response would probably involve shutting down all non-emergency air travel, screening every person who enters or leaves the country, isolating places with outbreaks. But no one is willing to do that because the holy god of the market comes before all else including human lives, so what's actually happening is governments wait until it starts getting bad and then start doing just enough to limit it without impacting the economy too much. Here in Murica we just have the added factor of a narcissist sociopath president who only cares about the stock market going up to get re-elected, so he's bullshitting to minimize it and shift blame to the libs and foreigners/minorities. And his fellow sociopaths are trying to figure out how to make a buck off it. Which goes to the rest of your comment...if people can't pay, fuck 'em. It's their fault for being poor. You apparently don't get how deep this Horatio Alger bullshit runs in U.S. society, even among the fairly "liberal". "America is the land of opportunity. Anyone can get ahead here if they work hard." Thus, logically, people who don't get ahead are that way because they don't work hard, and therefore deserve their fate. --47.146.63.87 (talk) 09:03, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
This is a valid criticism. 1.2 billion Chinese are not atheists; its just the official doctrine of their CCP oppressors. To say, "atheists eat snakes" is absurd. If you're going to pin the Coronavirus on atheists, pin it on the CCP's germwarfare labs and hold harmless the oppressed population who are forced to eat snakes under leftwing communist tyranny. nobsFree Roger Stone! 01:03, 20 March 2020 (UTC)

Knobs' really on a role at CP[edit]

[9]He published this bit which I agree is a political shot at goal from China but there are some glaring truths in the statement, mainly about the number of those infected. Undocumented immigrants of which there are millions will not seek medical treatment out of fear of deportation and millions more cannot afford health insurance or even afford to see a doctor to be tested. This puts the larger population at greater risk which would be greatly reduced with a universal healthcare system and without the xenophobic policies of Sir Donald. Atheists started it, religious and right wing conservatives refuse to treat it and hasten it's spread and mortality rate. I wonder if the fundies think God has given them immunity, either way the response is diabolically stupid.--Mercian (talk) 05:46, 14 March 2020 (UTC)

Tribalism is so beautiful. The important thing is that it's essential everyone call it "FOREIGN CHING CHONG CHINA virus", because it will assist the world in treating and containing it if we constantly remind everyone that it's a foreign poison introduced to our pure Vaterland by outsiders. Anyone who wants to call it by the "official" globalist name is just virtue signalling. (And why won't Obama say the words "radical Islamic terrorism"?!) This is the thing most worth caring about, way more than things like having reliable diagnostic tests available everywhere or ensuring people can get treatment. *sarcasm fully off* Why do you assume right-wingers see "illegals" and poors getting sick as a bad thing? Just because they generally don't come right out and say, "I want them dead"? They think Jesus will protect them if they pray hard enough, and if they die they go to heaven anyway. Nothing happens that isn't part of "God's plan", so why worry? Also I like Assfly's fart right below that. "If Trump would just declare his intention to be a dictator and nullify the laws, libs would realize the virus is no big deal!" What's the matter, Andy, too much of a wuss to just go right ahead and say you want a dictator to seize power and start rounding up your enemies? (In case anyone still needed convincing that right-wing authoritarians' bleating about the Constitution is disingenuous bullshit. The "constitution" they believe in is white male Christian rule.) --47.146.63.87 (talk) 11:32, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
Look, you guys should get off the globalism hobbyhorse now, under cover of the crisis. nobsFree Roger Stone! 00:32, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
No, I agree. Why are we spending our tax dollars on treating disgusting foreigners? US out of the UN! UN out of the US! If Trump had just sealed our borders, we wouldn't be having this problem. --47.146.63.87 (talk) 05:10, 30 March 2020 (UTC)

Andy does not like how things are going, blames everybody but Trump.[edit]

As far as I can tell Trump wanted both the FED to cut rates and The House to pass measures which excluded big business. In Andy's world Trump is blameless whilst the FED and Pelosi are the culprits[10][11]--Mercian (talk) 14:41, 17 March 2020 (UTC)

You might be onto something. I can't reconcile this [12] and [13]. nobsFree Roger Stone! 02:14, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
Actually, the two are reconcilable. However the problem is with the tone. At a time of noise and conflicting messages, using cynicism toward established institutions equates to panic-mongering, which needs to be quieted. Confidence and clarity needs to be the message. I am daily tempted to trash the CDC for example, which has a long history of cronyism and corruption. From a nationalist perspective, I limit my criticism to the WHO which is a globalist institution, while passing on the CDC which is connected to Dr. Anthony Fauci whom we're relying on as our chief voice of clarity.
The normal, healthy conservative skepticism needs to be toned down at times like this. Following Trump's lead - Yes, conservatives need to counterpunch and flatten mutherfucking unfair lying partisan critics, but not take the lead in creating more excessive and unnecessary noise and confusion when clarity is needed.

Tracking "conservative" reactions to The Virus[edit]

If you've got some time to spare, why not enjoy watching the way Conservapedia - or any other "conservative" website - has flipped and flopped on the topic over the last few weeks. LondonGrump (talk) 06:30, 19 March 2020 (UTC)

They follow Trump's lead like they have no minds of their own. Fox News was very dismissive when Trump was but began to take it seriously after Trump acknowledged there was a problem. You should check out https://www.rightwingwatch.org/ for numerous examples. As London is about to "close down" will that make you even more grumpy? Up here in Derbyshire we are just getting over The Black Death so have not had time to worry about Corona19--Mercian (talk) 11:28, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
London won't close down until it is forced to. Seeing the conditions for the lockdown in Spain, it's not a massively unreasonable proposition but Boris is all about small government: privatised profit, nationalised risk. If people die, it's our own fault.
The only thing making me grumpy at the moment, apart from the c*nt in Downing Street, is the missus. I wanted to cosplay a plague doctor on the tube and she won't let me. LondonGrump (talk) 18:10, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
I wonder if Andy Schlafly has now washed his hands for the first time in 40 years.Spud (talk) 15:27, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
Somewhere down the line a great conservative statesman in the mold of Trump will have to admit climate change is real. The troops will fall into line and start revising history to show it was all the fault of liberals in the first place.--Mercian (talk) 00:33, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
They follow Trump's lead
Nah, don't think so. You employ a vulgar stereotype here. Everyone, particularly Trump supporters, know Trump (a) is not a medical guy; (b) is not a hard science guy; (c) is very selective as to who he takes advice from; (d) is being very very un-Trumpian in reading scripts with detail medical/scientific garble written by others that he, and nobody else, understands. And he doesn't even fake it very well that he understands these details (which is the traditional job of a president). Trump is trusting people who know more about something than he does, which goes against his nature, but he has immersed himself in trying to learn.
What is happening here is (or was) an opportunity for the mainstream fake news media to rehabilitate themselves. Sadly, many are failing badly. nobsFree Roger Stone! 00:56, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
You're right, he is very selective as to he takes advice from. He takes advice from people who tell him what he wants to hear. Anyone and I mean anyone who has done anything, however tiny that does not toe the party line has been shown the door. He has surrounded himself with Dominionists one of which is his number 2, religious fundamentalists, conspiracy theorists, science deniers and general sycophants all to get the vote of the Conservapedia demographic and it worked a treat. There are numerous news stories of how one conservative or another tells that God spoke to them telling them that Trump is the saviour of Israel and other such bullshit. They worship the ground he walks on.--Mercian (talk) 01:42, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
That's only part of the story. It's not unlike Biden's lurch leftward to pick up Sanders supporters.
Some time ago (2016) I speculated somewhere what type of president Trump would be. He follows the mold of FDR and Reagan. He paints a broad vision, then looks for people to make that vision work. Like FDR and Reagan, he's not immersed in details (like Carter, Papa Bush, Clinton, and Obama were). Believe it or not, Trump has "the vision thing"; few American president's were visionaries (Lincoln, TR, Wilson, FDR, Nixon); the rest are followers of the visionary president who alters the course of history.
And why would it be surprising for a real estate developer to be a visionary? That, in fact, is what make a real estate developer in every city, town, and community. A guy who can look at a piece of land and envision what it can look like 20 or 30 years hence, and makes it happen. This is a rare trait in humans. nobsFree Roger Stone! 02:23, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
You see FDR and Reagan, I see Harding. Lots of land development in the 1920s too.
BTW Rob, I'm enjoying your insights into the virus over on CP. You are a man of many talents! LondonGrump (talk) 06:02, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
Thanks. I'm not gonna pretend I understand anything about the scientific or medical aspects. I'm trying to focus on the economic impacts. But there is some overlap in statistical analysis, for example the "flattening the curve" really is a statistical or economic analysis more than a scientific/medical conclusion.
I just read Jon Rappaport's piece that says most Italian deaths are likely due to reactions to treatment, and not the coronavirus. [14] Nevertheless, the numbers get chalked up to the virus itself and making fodder for the panic-mongers. nobsFree Roger Stone! 07:04, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
"He paints a broad vision, then looks for people to make that vision work." You mean like getting Jared to ask his father-in-law to ask a Facebook group "What is coronavirus?" And when you look at the people he's employed to "make is vision work' - Dvos, Carson, Pompeo, and the rest of the dribbling simpletons, one can only assume his vision is "Destroy America." RoundeTheeHorne (talk) 12:47, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
I hope you stocked up on toilet paper, especially since you're taking a big healthy crap all over internet posting sites when nobody is interested in your hate-filled drivel over questions of life and death. nobsFree Roger Stone! 14:25, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
Wow, Rob. Triggered much? Is it starting to sink that Trump's incompetence might get you killed? But hey, he's about to give another press conference, where he tells people he's not responsible, so run along and rah-rah in front of your TV. And fuck your faux rage about "questions of life and death" when you literally just posted conspiracy theory bullshit about "it's not the virus, it's the treatment." You really are an awful human being, you know that? RoundeTheeHorne (talk) 15:30, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
55% of Americans say 'fuck off'. nobsFree Roger Stone! 19:34, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
So... Mr Triggered, now all of a sudden you believe in polls. Funny how they're all fake news when they show his numbers in the shitter. How do you feel about Trump being unable to even offer a word of encouragement to the American people? Imagine you having to worship somebody with such little empathy. No wonder you're so defensive. And let's not get into the Tangerine Fuckwit (or do you prefer Gibbering Shitgibbon?) overruling an actual doctor, because he has a "feeling" some drug, in whose company he owns shares, will work? Remember when he said "I 15 cases, soon it'll be zero." It's 18,121 at the moment. When do you think Jared's going to finish his homework project? It's about time he handed it in, wouldn't you say? RoundeTheeHorne (talk) 20:04, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
PS Rob - the markets say fuck you & your President. He claims the highs were all him; guess what - he owns this too. Market's now lower than on Obama's last day. How your 401k doing?
DowJones.jpg -RoundeTheeHorne (talk) 21:04, 20 March 2020 (UTC)

What will them over there say when DT has to self-isolate? Anna Livia (talk) 15:03, 20 March 2020 (UTC)

Rob, what is opinion of Andy's out and out diabolic opinion that there is a Coronavirus over-reaction and that the US Olympic Team is abandoning it's athletes?[15] Anyone with any intelligence would realise that cancelling Olympic training facilities "IS" protecting athletes and the Olympics going ahead ahead as usual is nothing but moronic. It is people with attitudes like him who spread the virus and make it worse, putting even more strain on an already struggling health service.. The Olympics will not go ahead this summer and is unlikely to do so anytime this year. When that happens of course it will be a liberal plot to stop America from heading the medal tables. I have not been this strong in my words before but the man is a moron.--Mercian (talk) 05:40, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
Oh please, Andy is a Cunt and Rob is a bigger one for constantly tying himself in knots trying to defend him. RoundeTheeHorne (talk) 09:55, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
Not really. I posted this on MPR: [16] which says, "Stop listening to journalists. They don't know what they're talking about. Listen to Anthony Fauci and do not listen to anybody else." And what does he do? Headlines an attack on Dr. Fauci. nobsFree Roger Stone! 20:01, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
And did you call him out on it? Of course not, because you have to toe the Party line. Cowards, the lot of you. RoundeTheeHorne (talk) 11:04, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
Cunts are beautiful wonderful things that create life and give joy. Andy and Rob are none of that. --47.146.63.87 (talk) 05:48, 31 March 2020 (UTC)

British politics[edit]

Unlike what Rob S says, is not rabid (rabies has been locally extinct since 1922), and is not partisan - possibly something to do with the 1313 statute about armour in parliament and the separation distance of the two red lines. Besides there are more examples of this in the US than the UK (with this being a special case). Anna Livia (talk) 23:28, 21 March 2020 (UTC)

I'm assuming you refer to comments I made based upon American experiences with cp:Christopher Steele. Steele was quite an idiot in not understanding anything about the American political system, bureaucracy, media, constitutional rights, the American sense of fair play and even freedom of speech. He evidently thought whatever outrageous crap that must be common currency in UK electoral politics could be duplicated in the United States. Sure, he found kindred spirits among Democrats, the FBI, and journalists, but it all stunk to high heaven from the day he started his bullshit. And the fucking idiots in the Democrat party, Obama administration, and American media today have nothing but damaged careers, or are in denial about the massive fraud perpetrated upon the American people. And Steele to this day believes his rabid partisan lies and nonsense is perfectly acceptable and rational. I conclude the only way such deranged views about people and society is the product of the environment he hails from. nobsFree Roger Stone! 02:19, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
I came to these conclusions after reading the Katheleen Kavalec notes. How a formerly high level intelligence official and heir of the US/UK 'special relationship' that defeated Hitler and the Soviet Union could be so profoundly ignorant of the U.S. political system was stunning. He evidently truly believed the bullshit he dumped in Kathleen Kavalec's lap was perfectly legitimate and acceptable to achieve some political end. Maybe in the UK its acceptable and routine, but here in the U.S. we still do have a few civil servants with integrity. nobsFree Roger Stone! 02:34, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
Your response makes no reference to the systems in the British Isles (ie Parliament, devolved governments in Ireland, Scotland and Wales, the House of Keys, and the governments of Jersey and Guernsey). Anna Livia (talk) 19:49, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
That's bollocks mate. I cannot recall any serious UK politician calling for the imprisonment of their political opponents, not even with the DUP and Sinn Fein who are historically deadly enemies. Neither have I heard a politician mutter anything similar to Pizzgate or QANON. I have no beef with neighbours or friends who vote differently from me and my attitude is typical. Even in the most vicious BREXIT debates did The UK, politicians and public, come close to the partisanship and hatred that is seen in America every day.--Mercian (talk) 03:17, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
Rob, like the rest of the CP crew, know fuck all about Britain or Europe. They watch Steve Turley videos or read websites that are seventeen links removed from the primary source, add the first number they thought of, reverse it, take away six then shoehorn it into whatever position their leaders have adopted today. They are like very stupid Stalinists on magic mushrooms. Humour them. LondonGrump (talk) 06:41, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
(ec) No, I'm referring to the former head of MI6 Russia Desk sitting with a State Department official 30 days before the election, spewing obvious, admittedly, fraudulent partisan bullshit looking for help to rig an election. Now in the UK, elections happen in 30 days; in the US, the FBI, DOJ, and other Departments are restricted from giving the appearance of partisan actions 60 days prior to an election.
Yes, we have our mindless, rabid partisans; but for a former high level intelligence official who thinks bald faced lies and bullshit is going to sway the U.S. Justice Department to violate its own departmental regulations to engage in a conspiracy with foreigners to interfere in an election -- sure, this crap has been routine in the British Empire for decades if not centuries. But that sort of politicking sets us apart from the UK. Yes, we have stupid voters vulnerable to manipulation. No, our federal system is designed to resist such naked outside partisan and ideological interference.
Steele, a foreigner, waltzes into a State Department office and says, "Hey, the election is in 3 weeks. Here's some crap 'we' can use to win for 'our' side." Only a rabidly partisan culture, with values like that engrained in their bureaucracy produces such gangsters - cause the voting public has come to expect and accept it. nobsFree Roger Stone! 07:02, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
Spot on, Rob, spot on. LondonGrump (talk) 18:15, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
Presumably the Republicans who initially employed Steele were utter morons.Bob"Life is short and (insert adjective)" 19:10, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
We been over this a thousand times: the Free Beacon employed FusionGPS until the end of March when Trump won enuff delegates; Hillary Clinton picked up the contract then. FusionGPS hired Steele on June 12, 2016. Steele was never employed by any Republican client.
It is bullshit like that -- a steadfast refusal to ever come clean in the face of indisputable facts -- why partisans like yourself can never regain any credibility. Time for some soul searching, my friend. nobsFree Roger Stone! 23:08, 27 March 2020 (UTC)

How much of 'Unparliamentary Language' - [17] and [18] etc has been used in this and related US contexts? Anna Livia (talk) 19:49, 22 March 2020 (UTC)

Rob, you posted that the Democrats are obstructing a stimulus relief package, a package that was passed by the Democratic controlled House but failed in the Republican controlled Senate. I give up, you are not a stupid man, you know what you are posting is deliberately misleading bullshit. --Mercian (talk) 08:16, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
Seems like I was wrong, apologies.--Mercian (talk) 12:00, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
That's very noble of you, and much appreciated. nobsFree Roger Stone! 23:10, 27 March 2020 (UTC)

Two metres[edit]

Conservapedia proven right!

The UK government keeps saying people should keep 2m apart and all I can think of is Ed Poor's masterpiece from long ago. Avida Dollarsher again 09:10, 23 March 2020 (UTC)

It is as the prophesy foretold!!!!
Also: cf: "Conservapedia Proven Right." RoundeTheeHorne (talk) 15:24, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
The jingle, if anyone wants it:
'A metre's three-foot-three.
It's longer than a yard you see.'
(The litre and kilogram versions on request.) Anna Livia (talk) 19:54, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
Hahaha. Years ahead of his time. Helena Bonham Carter (talk) 02:17, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
'A statement of fact cannot be insolent' (though CP's interpretation of it may be). Anna Livia (talk) 12:53, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
Shouldn't it be
'A metre's three-foot-three-ish.
It's longer than a yard you see. Ish.'
51.6.140.42 (talk) 17:24, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
That was how the ditty went.
'Two and a quarter pounds of jam
Weigh about a kilogram'
'A litre of water's
A pint and three quarters'

For most people a sufficiently close approximation: and the UK is prepared to combine measurements (rubber bands being 6 inches long, 3 millimetres wide). Anna Livia (talk) 18:19, 24 March 2020 (UTC)

The actual version of the metre rhyme was: "a metre measures three foot three; it's longer than a yard, you see". 2A00:23C6:548B:E500:6843:BCB1:B495:1E3E (talk) 15:06, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
Ditties evolve - and the key point is the numbers. Is there a ditty for Fahrenheit and Centigrade? (I know the fraction 5/8 or 8/5 is involved and the number 32 gets added or subtracted, but not more). Anna Livia (talk) 17:15, 27 March 2020 (UTC)

Shout out to Rob[edit]

Seeing as the Conservapedia party line is now that Italy's government is leaning left, you might like to memory hole this. You're welcome. LondonGrump (talk) 17:47, 24 March 2020 (UTC)

According to Andy, any government that isn't actively hanging gays and atheists from lampposts, is left-leaning. Unless they're Muslim. RoundeTheeHorne (talk) 18:49, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
Sadly that is true. Early last year when Brunei bought in the law to stone gay people it was a "Setback for the homosexual agenda" A week or so later when Brunei announced it would not stone them to death it was "Caving to leftists" leaving absolutely no doubt on his position. I have not yet seen the ultra pro life Andy back Trump's proposed abandonment of 4,000,000 Americans to Covid19 to shore up the economy and his re election chances but I have no doubt he will. Remember, pro life starts at conception and ends with the birth, after that they are on their own.--Mercian (talk) 23:05, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
I have said with facetiousness that Ken has blood on his hands, he hasn't, it was pointless sparring and unnecessary. Andy will have though, another appalling post from him today [19] praising a moronic pastor for defying a state ban and holding a service for 1000+ people in his mega church which over-zealous liberals tried to stop. Conservatives are supposed to be pro life and pro law and order. Supporting this is both pro death and defiance of the law. I think a more appropriate stance is that they pro life and pro law and order ONLY if and when it suits their ideology.--Mercian (talk) 02:04, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
You raise an interesting moral point, Mercian. Although there is nothing close to equivalence yet, let's use the example of the Holocaust. Who was to blame? The camp guards? The men who drove the trains to the camps? The men who maintained the locomotives and track? The people who fed and clothed the maintenance staff? The people who staffed the shops that supplied the food and clothes? The truck drivers that delivered to the shops? The Circle of Guilt becomes fainter and fainter, even though every last person in that chain contributed in his or her small way to the enormity of the Shoah. However, the lines are more defined when you look at who cheered the Nazis, who them explicit, vocal moral support, who gave them the eucharist.
Ken may not have blood on his hands now but he fully supports and enables those who do. Now.
If "it happened here" and a new Anne Frank was in his neighbour's attic, what do you think he would do? LondonGrump (talk) 07:43, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
I am not sure what he would do but at least he is taking this threat seriously. It has been quite a sudden change from posting pictures of cute dogs and blaming atheists who eat them for the disease to posting coherent postings such as how the curve needs to be flattened, people need to isolate and if the economy takes a hit so be it. Andy is still posting that the spring months are a "setback for global warning" as the virus fares better in the cold. How the Olympics will (Conservapedia proven wrong)and should go ahead and praising a church crowd that some League Two teams would be happy to get. People can change their views, it seems Ken's at least on this issue have tempered whilst Andy has done the impossible and moved further into right wing lunacy than ever before.--Mercian (talk) 08:01, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
And just like that, he proves you right and me wrong.[20]--Mercian (talk) 09:51, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
One thing remains constant. Ken, like most of his buddies, can't evaluate evidence for toffee. LondonGrump (talk) 13:52, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
They still fawn to Trump like he is God. The man who two weeks ago declared himself a War President surrendered two days ago. No clue, no empathy, no intelligence, no chutzpah and a complete lack of Machismo. The macho man surrendered without a fight, thinking only of himself and his political future. Trump's new standard is a white cross on a white background, appropriate for a coward. Churchill promised nothing but blood, toil, tears and sweat, that's what a war leaders does. Trump offers false hope, pseudoscience and selfishness. --Mercian (talk) 08:34, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
Look, the racist Mexicans just closed the border with the US, and the racist totalitarian Democrat governor of Rhode Island set up border check points and is incarcerating New Yorkers in quarantine gulags without trial. You guys need to seriously rethink some deeply held positions. nobsFree Roger Stone! 23:17, 27 March 2020 (UTC)

Ken wants a Rob to send a message to London Grump.[edit]

As Rob has refused in the past to pass on messages from Ken and he is too cowardly to do so in person here it is before he bravely over-sites the post. [21]

Re: "One thing remains constant... [User: Conservative]..., like most of his buddies, can't evaluate evidence for toffee. LondonGrump (talk) 13:52, 26 March 2020 (UTC)"

Please tell LondonGrump that I know there is plenty of evidence pointing to secular leftism and globalism dropping like a rock in influence and right-wing nationalism and religious fundamentalism gaining influence.

"Others migrated from Rational Wiki to alt-right online hubs like 4Chan and Reddit." - BreakPoint, December 23, 2019 (reprinted in Chatanooga Times Free Press)[22]

Lastly, ask him to read the article Atheism and evidence which ranks #10 at a popular search engine that begins with a G for the phrase "Atheism and evidence". What proof and evidence does he have that atheism is a valid worldview?Conservative (talk) 02:22, 27 March 2020 (EDT)

Brave Sir Kenneth ran away, when danger reared it's ugly head he bravely turned his heels and fled, Brave brave Sir Kenneth.--Mercian (talk) 08:47, 27 March 2020 (UTC)

Is he still doing that "popular search engine that begins with a G" shit? It's like it's 2012 again. (And I wish it fucking was.) Spud (talk) 13:43, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
Evidence for toffee - [23] and [24] (and many, many, many other sites and cookbooks). Anna Livia (talk) 17:11, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
Brave Sir Kendol, do you honestly think that if this drug that your pseudo doctor is pushing was an effective cure that the whole world would be crying for it? They are not because he is speaking bullshit, dangerous bullshit at that as stupid naive people like yourself fall for it and are given false hope. As you push this crap the the infection and death rate continues to rise exponentially. If only they listened to you eh, the man who thinks that atheism is the route of all the worlds health problems. Where is your God now Ken? Why has he not answered the prayers of all good conservatives and rid the world of this awful disease?--Mercian (talk) 19:16, 27 March 2020 (UTC)

Hey, Ken, I'm flattered. If none of your collective wants to come here and join in, why not send someone to fix the thing about Italy moving to the populist right. You know, the Italy you think is moving to the left. You know, the one you have evidence for moving to the right. That one. LondonGrump (talk) 21:56, 27 March 2020 (UTC)

It's a miracle medicine, meanwhile the US has over 100,000 cases and rising sharply. It is very likely that the US will have the highest infection and death rate before this is over. If the response where the responsibility of anyone else than girly Trump this would not be so (Has anyone seen his briefings? it's all me, me, me, I am great, I am the best, the messiah, leader of the world, like a spoilt brat who's daddy bought her the wrong colour Range Rover for her 18th birthday) There is no doubt that when in becomes obvious that it is not a miracle cure and cases continue to rise that all the diarrhoea Ken has spouted will be deep burnt. As I have passed on a message for you Ken perhaps you can pass one to Andy from me. Even Trump was disgusted at the actions of a certain Thomas Massie, calling for his unseating. Remind Andy that it is forbidden to go against the word of Trump in any circumstances whatsoever. He should remove it.--Mercian (talk) 09:17, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
PS, Ken, are you descended from Ulster folk? It's just a hunch but take a look a the Ulster Banner and my hunch will become clear.--Mercian (talk) 09:22, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
I see Ken's new favourite doctor, and his miracle cure, appear to be deeply flawed. RoundeTheeHorne (talk) 13:03, 28 March 2020 (UTC)

User Conservative, Gentlemen.[edit]

[25] Any person with any intelligence would understand that my reference to the Ulster Banner is an analogy . Red hand of Ulster means that someone in legend cut of and threw his hand so he could touch Ulster's soil first, it means you have blood on your hands, red hand of Ulster etc, understand now? In the time of world crisis you go back to your atheism and shite. New Zealand has not shut it's borders to stop immigration, they have closed their borders, like every other country in the world, to stop the spread of this deadly virus that you are finding both a source of humour and a stick to beat atheists with. You truly are a sick bastard. I for one hope you don't actually get sick whilst you, I am sure, want us all to die in our atheistic misery. I say again, you are a sick bastard, Ole Ole Ole.--Mercian (talk) 18:44, 28 March 2020 (UTC)

PS you must be mentally ill, someone pays you a compliment, like I did, and you spend the next 3 days dribbling and playing with your crayons to prove that you are unworthy of being complimented. What's up Sir Brave Sir [User: Conservative], can't you take a compliment? I think it is more likely that you are such a wanker that no one has ever paid you a compliment before and you just have no idea how to handle it. Even other Conservapedians strongly dislike you. What does it feel like to be the most hateful of an already strongly hateful gang of armchair thugs? Sick Bastard.--Mercian (talk) 18:54, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
And it's gone, and back, removed messy capture--Mercian (talk) 19:48, 28 March 2020 (UTC)

Conservapedian grammar[edit]

Hey, Ken. Get one of your collective to find out what a conditional verb is. Then explain it to everyone else on Conservapedia, including PeterKaPeterKa. It will improve your comprehension no end and you'll be able to use words like "citation" with confidence.

There is no excuse for such poor literacy in a Western nation in 2020. Let's start with the little things and you can build up to the difference between a symptom and a disease. One day, you might even do the rocket science like R0. LondonGrump (talk) 09:50, 29 March 2020 (UTC)

Grammar is unimportant, what is important is the virus is sparing conservatives and disproportionally (sic) affecting liberal/leftist geographic strongholds in the United States. The fewer people to vote for Trump the better. The pseudo cure he is pushing is working a treat, the US infection rate is only 112,000 (as of 18 hours ago)and rising fast but they are all liberals so that does not matter. The good pro (liberal) death conservatives are all protected by taking Bakker's Silver Solution, Jones' toothpaste and by going to church in their 1000s to pray for immunity.--Mercian (talk) 11:14, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
Liberals (in the US and CP senses) voting for Trump - who is the proper conservative candidate in CP terms? One of these? Anna Livia (talk) 12:57, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
Democraps, every last blue one of them Anna. LondonGrump (talk) 17:01, 29 March 2020 (UTC)]

TK[edit]

I am not aware of this guy, before my time, I know that he died some time back. Was he a particularly liberal Conservapedian? I ask because in a now recent but deleted post Ken was dancing on his grave saying it was him who was hated, there was an Ole Ole Ole so I am presuming so.--Mercian (talk) 11:22, 29 March 2020 (UTC)

Ha! TK was the über Conservapedian (see here). He was an RW user, you can access his talk page archives from here. He was totally self-centred (IMHO) and would have supplanted Andy if he could. Scream!! (talk) 12:03, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
I vaguely remember him as notable for a very hardline approach to banning users. and some falling out with andy. AMassiveGay (talk) 12:37, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
or more accurately vaguely remember talk of him. AMassiveGay (talk)
So why the grave dancing?--Mercian (talk) 13:38, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
possibly ken fell foul of tk's blocking regime. very probable even. I cant stress the draconian blocking enough btw. it was his thing. and this is all still 2nd hand half memories. I just know he blocked everyone and he pissed everyone off. AMassiveGay (talk) 13:56, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
TK was a fucking Golden Age legend. LondonGrump (talk) 16:58, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
This is the case. They really didn't like each other towards the end, and feuded in various ways. As I recall, TK really did block Ken at one point, but Ken unblocked himself. And that recent behavior by Ken does sound typical, though I haven't kept up with events there.192․168․1․42 (talk) 05:43, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
TK was a deep level parodist, something that the morons at CP were totally unaware of until after he died. In fact they were unaware he had died until it was posted on here. TK managed to cause more damage to conservapedia than possible any other single user. He managed to get super admin powers from schlafly and promptly used them to range block more than half the world, and I am not joking. At one stage the whole of the UK was range blocked at ip level from CP because TK was singly handly destroying the place. The only way I could view CP was to use a US based proxy. As a user he was possibly one of the most obnoxious people who ever lived, as a deep level parodist he was without peer. 87.74.14.220 (talk) 12:47, 30 March 2020 (UTC)

Ken and me[edit]

Y'all remember when Ken had a hard-on for yours truly? I do. The results of that brief affair are still linked on my user page if any of y'all are interested. Oxyaena Harass 07:38, 30 March 2020 (UTC)

The image of Ken with a hard on I do not need. LondonGrump (talk) 11:36, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
Dead dove? Anna Livia (talk) 18:00, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
My long-dead sock at CP (bless her traitorous little heart) often used to receive long, creepy messages from Ken. It was about the same time as his "long haired Asian ladies" posted started appearing on MPR. RoundeTheeHorne (talk) 08:54, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
Nobody's really all that interested in watching Ken dunk on you. You're not very good at this. — Unsigned, by: 98.32.212.70 / talk / contribs
I`m not really interested in Ken, and clarify as to how I`m "not good at this?" It was a one-time thing, a simple curiosity. Does everyone here have to be such a negative ninny? Oxyaena Harass 22:03, 7 April 2020 (UTC)

Andy's MPR posts since the shutdown.[edit]

[26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35] I especially like the "Setback for global warning, spring will come and cure the virus". WTF does that actually mean! There is a pattern here, every one of his posts criticises one person or the other for doing the right thing apart from the congressman who "stood up to bullying" who did very much the wrong thing. Is this man a pillar of the conservative christian community or a spoilt brat who hates it that things are not going how he wants them too. No need to answer, I have learned by reading articles during my enforced social distancing (which I agree with) that a pillar of the conservative christian community and spolit brat are the same thing. And this man is allowed to teach kids.--Mercian (talk) 08:35, 31 March 2020 (UTC)

Is he still teaching kids? It’s been ages since CP has seen new home-school content, and I have the impression, which could be wrong, that asking about its current use as a home school resource is a banning offense. MDB (the MD used to be for Maryland, but now means Magically Deliciousthe B is still for Bear) 13:38, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
He's switched to all hyroxychloroquine. The whole pandemic is now a liberal plot based on denying God's gift of this virus-vanquisher. Democrat governors won't distribute it. And somehow they stop Republic governors from distributing it too. Whoover (talk) 16:54, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
There does seem to be some promise with hyroxychloroquine, I am not sure whether the genius who invented this cure was Andy or Trump though. Awards from WHO because of their discovery can wait, for now it would speed things up if a sample of the virus and hyroxychloroquine were released to Andy for testing. I believe he has both experience and expertise on such matters--Mercian (talk) 07:28, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
Vargas Milan has already invoked Andy's superb work on Lenski's research.LondonGrump (talk) 12:23, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
Trump’s base’s obsession with hyroxychloroquine is approaching attributing miraculous healing to him. And they mocked liberals for believing in the “Obamessiah”.
I wonder if Jim Bakker will start hocking little bits of fabric guaranteed to be from the hem of Trump’s garment, yours for a free-will love offering of only $149.95 plus shipping and handling, so you can touch it and be healed!
They’re gonna start praying to Trump, not for him, by the time the election rolls around. MDB (the MD used to be for Maryland, but now means Magically Deliciousthe B is still for Bear) 11:49, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
And 'Freedom survives in only nine states, where Republican governors decline to issue stay-at-home orders'. Fucking hell. 2A00:23C6:548B:E500:3056:630A:C12D:9F9D (talk)
I am not sure where he lives but it is in New Jersey. I have been to NJ and the part I was in was just miles and miles of what were de facto NYC suburbs. I would think that any reasonable person, in the legal sense and living close to the hottest spot of this outbreak would take this much more seriously.--Mercian (talk) 15:46, 6 April 2020 (UTC)

Rob Smith's quote mine.[edit]

[36] Prior to this post Rob described the virus as "The Wuhan Virus" on numerous occasions. In this post he links to a video from CNN who scold those who call it as such. Rob quote mines it as "Wuhan coronavirus as CNN refers to it". Who are you trying to fool Rob?--Mercian (talk) 08:46, 1 April 2020 (UTC)

People who actually have refered to Covid19 as "The Wuhan Virus"
  • Rob Smith
  • Donald Trump
  • Mike Pompeo
  • Tucker Carlson
  • Paul Gosar (R-AZ)
  • Tom Cotton (R-Arkansas)
  • and Rob Smith

All of them Godless liberal racist CNN viewers.--Mercian (talk) 09:01, 1 April 2020 (UTC)

Where's Swabbie?[edit]

Yo, Cowardjou - are you just going to let Creepy Uncle Ed just shit all over your beloved Navy like that? You served, you should know what a captain's responsibility is. Or are you just going to grab your ankles again, like you usually do? RoundeTheeHorne (talk) 08:56, 7 April 2020 (UTC)

Ooh, and now Modly's resigned. Let's see Creepy Uncle Ed, or Rob from Pravda, spin this one, so it's the liberals' fault. RoundeTheeHorne (talk) 19:51, 7 April 2020 (UTC)