Conservapedia talk:What is going on at CP?

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search

What is going on?

(talk) (talk) (talk) (talk) (hic)

As a point of etiquette, please use the [add section] tab above, or the "Add new section" link below, when adding a new topic, and the appropriate [edit] tab when commenting on existing topics. This will lessen the incidence of edit conflicts. Thank you.

When adding a link to Conservapedia that is not already on What is going on at CP? please place <capture></capture> around the link.

This page is automatically archived by Archiver
Archives for this talk page: Archive list

The Battle of Gay Bowel Syndrome[edit]

Revision history

[1] So you find the death of a thousand men on HMS Hood a topic of humour do you Ken? Ha ha ha, those who died on 9/11 is a great joke, do you find that funny? Then again you have shown much scorn for unionised firemen who went into the buildings knowing damn well they would not be coming out again so you probably do. You total and utter fucking wanker--Mercian (talk) 11:56, 1 February 2019 (UTC)

I apologise for the above post and would remove it if it were not RW policy. Rage over but that lowlife has somehow done the impossible and sunk even lower.--Mercian (talk) 12:04, 1 February 2019 (UTC)

Pssst Ken![edit]

Gay Bowel Syndrome

A couple of points on your last missive

  1. Using "Hood" as an analogy is particularly applicable to a racist website like yours.
  2. The "Germanic efficiency" you gloat about were Nazis. Yup. you're literally cheering on Nazis. You could've used Bismark, or Tirpitz, or Yamato, but you chose to cheer on the Nazis. Very "Christian" of you.
  3. Read up on what happened to the Bismark. That is literally the analogy of your life.
  4. The fact that you're resurrecting GBS 8 years after you were handed your arse on what bullshit it is, shows just how weak your argument is.
  5. Quote mining people does not facts make.
  6. Well done on covering the family friendly encyclopedia with gay bowels again.
  7. Does the syndrome also affect Mormon girls who have anal sex to preserve their virginity?

Lets see how long it takes for your post to vanish. Oh, it already has. LongLostLegend (talk) 12:02, 1 February 2019 (UTC)

Denying obvious truths.
I would ask how he is allowed to get away with this crap but Schlafly is just as much of a turd as he is. He can get away with crap but if you call Ken a fool on CP you are threatened with the ban hammer. [2]--Mercian (talk) 12:10, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
It's easy - Ken (like all the early sysops) regurgitates a huge amount of the homophobic, sexist, racist drivel that Andy masturbates himself to sleep with every night. It doesn't matter if it's correct or not, if Andy likes it - it goes in the encyclopedia. The irony being that Andy and Ken probably share equal responsibility for the conservative community shunning Conservapedia, like a gay stepchild. LongLostLegend (talk) 12:20, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
Although this was vaped it seems to double down that WW2 was the fault of Britain. Conservative (Talk | contribs) deleted page User:Conservative/Gentlemen ‎(content was: "Mercian, Between being the fountainhead of Darwinism and helping to craft a poorly done Versailles Treaty, the Brits played a key role in terms of help..." (and the only contributor was "Conservative")) With the vile posts he allows to stand it is horrifying to think what is behind his many over sited posts. It would be very hard to find but I believe Schlafly himself referred to 1930s Germany in favourable terms to the contemporary UK. --Mercian (talk) 09:05, 3 February 2019 (UTC)

Who has the gayest bowel?[edit]

For anyone interested - if you head on over to and read the talk pages of user:RuyLopez (Ken’s sock over there) you’ll see him get completely owned on the Gay Bowel Syndrome stuff. I don’t know why he is rehashing it now given he was completely thumped by everyone on it some 10 years ago. Enjoy. Acei9

WIGO entry from June 2017

I never noticed this matter because I rarely think of homosexuality. Generally, I only think about of the topic of homosexuality when the media mentions the subject.
One of the reasons I rarely think of the subject of homosexuality is the inoculation I received against homosexuality from the John Wayne movies I watched. :)
 K e n  D o l l  (FSTDT link)

Just imagine...[edit]

You know nothing of Conservapedia and you stumble on it and are immediately directed to an “essay” explaining how John Wayne has straight and clean bowl health and that people don’t associate Armish with anal sex. Is the no better deprement to the cause than Ken. Acei9 23:49, 5 February 2019 (UTC)

See also: The Atlantic's November 20, 2007 article on What Conservapedia Is Really About
I wonder if Andy ever looks at his works and despairs--"Shut up, Brx." 05:12, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
It's a fun thought experiment but I really doubt he has that sort of self-awareness and reflection, or if he does, he certainly lost it years ago. --It's-a me, LeftyGreenMario!(Mod) 05:15, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
It's funny how much of human civilization is driven by lack of self-awareness--"Shut up, Brx." 05:18, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
And you then decide it is a fantastic resource for your child's education, after all that is CP's stated purpose. As for Andy despairing, no chance. Ken is his useful tool to say things he totally agrees with whilst being able to distance himself from such comments --Mercian (talk)
I mean, cocky people are people who run for government and then run for civilization, and you need a certain amount of cockiness to just dismiss and stomach criticism you're going to get, especially the vicious stuff. Call me for a lack of imagination, argument from incredulity, but I just can't imagine a shy, sensitive person ever winning office. But I don't think Andy runs civilization lol, he's more of a symptom of Bible fever... maybe more like pneumonia. I really don't understand either Andy or Ken's thought processes. I'd go insane from building so many walls to deflect criticism and double down, they'd crush me. --It's-a me, LeftyGreenMario!(Mod) 05:24, 6 February 2019 (UTC)

Responses to atheist arguments[edit]

Updated text from work of genius to describe Ken's approach:

When having a discussion with an atheist hiding behind a website you never leave and can control all and every ground-rule to avoid actual discussion, it is important to listen block first and shout about winning every debate afterwards, be empathetic Accuse your opponents of every moral failing from being obese, being a necrophiliac or a bestiality fiend, and build rapport with that atheist lose all respect by being unwilling or too incompetent to actually build and argue an actual position. In addition, ask open ended questions pretend your questions have never been answered despite being answered numerous times over many years. If this is not done, the atheist will be resistant to what the believer in God has to say By doing all this you'll only convince everyone of your utter weakness and cowardice while spouting irrelevant Sun Tzu quotes when we all know Sun Tzu says the complete opposite of what your actually doing. In other words, Tzu was not a weakling who hid inside his wall shouting about how he could defeat people without actually doing anything.

Hope this has been enlightening. Acei9 08:08, 8 February 2019 (UTC)

@Ace McWicked I think he's confused you with me. I was the one who went on that Sun Tzu spiel. Palaeonictis Fossil beds 10:14, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
Geez u guys, you're sleeping on the job. He's making the argument for the Green New Deal and the War on Cow Farts now [3][4] as the world adopts an American diet:
You see the planet earth moving towards what is the Standard American Diet. We’ve seen this massive increase in consumption of meat produced by the industrial animal agriculture industry. The tragic reality is this planet simply can’t sustain billions of people consuming industrially produced animal agriculture because of environmental impact. It’s just not possible, as China, as Africa move toward consuming meat the same way America does because we just don’t have enough land. The number-one reason for rainforest destruction now is animal grazing land. We see greenhouse producing gases produced; the devastating impact is just not practical. The numbers just don’t add up. We will destroy our planet unless we start figuring out a better way forward when it comes to our climate change and our environment. nobs piss in my ear 20:11, 17 February 2019 (UTC)

Ref: Essay:_Open_letter_to_the_British_agnostic_%22Mercian%22[edit]

Open letter

I don't converse with Nazi Sympathisers. Go and write an essay titled "The eternal atheist", showing some pictures of rat infestations, that would be right up your street--Mercian (talk) 17:37, 10 February 2019 (UTC)

PS. In your latest later to ACE you say "Ace McWicked, if you want to get in contact with the User: Conservative account, you can do so here: MESSAGE AREA. The message area may be checked infrequently. If you want to provide feedback concerning content this account has created at Conservapedia, please use the talk pages of the respective articles." Checked infrequently my arse, you will be checking it every few minutes to satisfy your sexual desires.--Mercian (talk) 17:43, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
On Samhb's talk page ". re: Atheism and cancer article: I had no idea that you had cancer when I wrote the article Atheism and cancer." So when taking into account this post[5] dated 22 December 2017 at 11.52 AM UK time and this article [6] at 08.32 EST ,2 hours after I posted proves that he is a liar.--Mercian (talk) 00:09, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
@Mercian Why is he now so obsessed with making personal attack essays? --Goatspeed. Watch meCircularREmail2.gifasoningSteal my ideas 22:03, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
I think it's a way for him to feel more like he's a beribboned soldier fighting a grand noble war in a clash of civilizations and less like an angry internet shitposter identical to every other middle aged white guy who blames Mexico for stealing their youth and the kids not calling. Some people are comforted by the thought of their boot stamping a human face forever. I appreciate it when people warn me of this in advance, though, so I can avoid being around them. Semipenultimate (talk) 16:25, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
He is so desperate for attention that he answers a nearly 7 year old question by a user who has not posted in over 3.[7]--Mercian (talk) 05:17, 26 February 2019 (UTC)

Ken's message area.[edit]

He advised that we could post on this page [8] if we wanted to communicate with him. As you can see that statement, like every other thing he types with his keyboard is absolute and total bollocks.--Mercian (talk) 20:42, 26 February 2019 (UTC)

This is, oh... *chef's kiss* Semipenultimate (talk) 22:19, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
This message is better [9] - (talk) 22:43, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
Link goes to an error page. Semipenultimate (talk) 15:53, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
He deleted it after I posted. He is like a devious dirty old man who tries to lure a kid in with sweets before closing the gate and denying he did such a thing in the first place.--Mercian (talk) 16:47, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

Article of the Year.[edit]

Ken unilaterally decides that one his shit pieces which is nothing more than a copy/paste of other articles of his, without any regard whatsoever of other users work, is [10] That is how dictators operate after all. Meanwhile in Andyland, being right-wing murderous scumbags had nothing to do with the New Zealand Massacres, it was Facebook [11] Before he comes back with any "Witty" repartee I would like to remind people what Ken thinks of victims of terrorism "Pro sodomite sluts and whores" --Mercian (talk) 23:15, 15 March 2019 (UTC)

Fucking dumb ass. Obviously if there was no Facebook this would never have happened. WTF is wrong with you? Can't you see the logic in this? Acei9 02:50, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
It's not incorrect that social media, and more broadly the internet, has made it a lot easier for the worst of the worst in society to form large communities and spread their toxic mentalities without social or legal repercussions. It's not obvious how to address this short from overreaching government action. Maybe the Luddites were right all along. 2A02:1810:4D34:DC00:6C5D:2EE2:4AFB:6C04 (talk) 03:18, 18 March 2019 (UTC)

Ref Essay: To the British agnostic Mercian, re: your bitter obsession with my views on the Manchester Arena bombing[edit]

[12] So criticising your view that the victims were "Pro sodomite sluts and whores" is a bitter obsession is it wanker? If you want to play the cunt two can play at that, I still have the screenshot where you described the victims as such, I think I will now post it on all the social media I can, Schalafly employers and patreons etc to show the world that for every vile article which is allowed to stand far more vile articles are deep burned. lets see if you are still Schalafly's blue eyed boy after his name has been dragged through the mud.--Mercian (talk) 10:07, 17 March 2019 (UTC) (UTC)

Schlafly doesn't have a name to drag through the mud. But link to your threatened social media blitz please. — Unsigned, by: / talk
Kind of thing I'd like to read about in the Mail Online - "Sick US website celebrates Manchester terrorist bombing" and links to the Westboro Baptists. LondonGrump (talk) 17:29, 18 March 2019 (UTC)