User talk:Andrew5

Archives for this talk page:

<1>

, (new)

This user has been the victim of an unintentional block.

soft reminder

Hey, please don't make edit reasons like this again. They're kinda spammy when on people's watchlists. I see that Bongolian gave you a short block already for the offensive nature of the content (since you might not be aware, it's a corollary of the "autistic screeching" meme), but keep in mind that other people do usually read the edit reasons. While jokey stuff doesn't matter, please don't make it spammy. -- Techpriest (talk) 21:01, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

I had one other edit idea I was debating, and then I decided to do what I wouldn't do on Wikipedia (in light of recent events). Long story short, for once, Wikipedia's way was correct. --Andrew5 (talk) 21:19, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

That edit summary was indeed offensive, and I deleted it for the same. Don't do that again. LongStylus (talk) 01:47, 30 November 2021 (UTC)

I am not ban evading

@Bongolian I am not ban evading. I know my contributions have been sometimes disruptive, and I have misused admin tools, but I am not ban evading. I am the same as Andrew5 on Wikipedia, and Gale5050 on Uncyclopedia. There was crosswiki abuse but I have not previously used another account. I was simply removing the banned tags because consensus has ruled against tagging socks. I would like a re-evaluation of the situation please. --Andrew5 (talk) 21:10, 5 December 2021 (UTC)

Also, if it was a misclick I do understand. (Though I do doubt that). --Andrew5 (talk) 21:14, 5 December 2021 (UTC)

Sorry about that, it was a mistake! Bongolian (talk) 21:47, 5 December 2021 (UTC)

That’s ok, I have made accidential rollbacks all the time. Andrew5 mobile (talk) 21:52, 5 December 2021 (UTC)

Heading text

I sincerely apologize, I didn't realize this vote ended a few weeks ago.--April ^Chat? 19:04, 26 December 2021 (UTC)

It's ok. In the future,check the top of the AFD, if it says "Keep" in the result, then that means kept. I agree it probably could have a better signal for closing, such as {{vote closed}} and {{vote closed bottom}}. --Andrew5 (talk) 19:08, 26 December 2021 (UTC)

Another reminder

Your edit summary here is disruptive. You've already been told to stop doing that and you haven't. Stop it. LongStylus (talk) 22:32, 27 December 2021 (UTC)

I actually do remember that. However I assumed it meant "don't do things to offend autistics", not "don't spam vowels". (As an aside, there is a 45% chance I'm autistic). --Andrew5 (talk) 22:53, 27 December 2021 (UTC)

I can assume it's disruptive only because of the way the edit summary forces the screen to elongate, and I will admit I didn't realize that. Technical oversight on my part. We should consider adding this to RW:CS. -Andrew5 (talk) 23:15, 27 December 2021 (UTC)

Techpriest clearly warned you for writing a "spammy" edit summary. LongStylus (talk) 00:39, 28 December 2021 (UTC)

It was subtle, but it was there. Probably should've read that a few times. Fun fact: I didn't understand quite what went on with Ken till I read his coop the 2nd time. --Andrew5 (talk) 00:41, 28 December 2021 (UTC)

Alright. Be careful next time and happy editing. LongStylus (talk) 00:46, 28 December 2021 (UTC)

Andrew, this site runs in part on "don't shoot your own foot off". We don't need to amend the CS for disruptive edit summaries because it's just one of those things that makes sense. -- Techpriest (talk) 16:03, 28 December 2021 (UTC)

I have a question for you

Don't take it wrong please. By any chance, are you from an EAS discord server? I cannot help but think that. If I am wrong, sorry. --Non-Binary EAS Creator (talk) 18:26, 30 December 2021 (UTC)

No.--Andrew5 (talk) 20:13, 30 December 2021 (UTC)

Discord

RW discord is awful. I caught LGM and a few others talking shit about me too. It’s the posse, man. Aceⁱ⁹ 07:07, 31 December 2021 (UTC)

I'm really sorry Andrew5 for talking about you like this on Discord. I don't think you're a bad person, I was just vexed from the behavior and thought venting in Discord where there's not much response and "main" drama, was a good idea and maybe try to get a bigger opinion on how to approach. I want people to trust me and see me as honest and sincere, but this is my fault if people start thinking I'm gossiping behind people's backs and they start doubting my sincerity or maybe they think I'm an asshole who shouldn't be running the wiki. Hell maybe you'll think I'm apologizing only because you "noticed". If you don't like me, that's understandable. I don't fault you. You're learning place, you'll probably get the hang of it eventually, In the meantime, though, I'll probably curtail conversations about people there; though I admit, I've complained about USHA and probably a few others too, so that'll have to change. --It's-a me, LeftyGreenMario! 07:58, 31 December 2021 (UTC)

fuck off. Aceⁱ⁹ 14:55, 2 January 2022 (UTC)