Talk:Answers Research Journal

	This Answers in Genesis related article has been awarded SILVER status for quality. We like it, and you should too! See RationalWiki:Article rating for more information.

Archives for this talk page:

<1>

, (new)

Discover Magazine's article

I am amazed that the reply comments come down so heavily pro AIJ. That anyone can have the dexterity and nous to operate a computer and at the same time believe their guff really astounds me. Susan^purrrrr 18:06, 3 March 2008 (EST)

I think it is because the nutjobs are running around defending their new baby. They would be far more energized, and be searching for blog-mentions, etc. I'd say, just give it time. Those people aren't at Discover because they like the magazine, they are there because it mentioned their baby. human 18:22, 3 March 2008 (EST)

Backdoor plug: I've written quite a bit about these bozos, e.g. here. -- -PalMD ^--Goatspeed! 16:33, 30 July 2008 (EDT)

subpages

As the primary contributor to this page, I do not like the subpages idea for this. If ARJ really takes off and has tons of articles, maybe, but people don't read subpages. Sterile^{walkie-talkie} 21:52, 16 February 2009 (EST) (On the other hand, I'm willing to go the way of the mob. Other ideas for organization are appreciated. I've considered ranking in categories, but have never gotten that off the ground.) Sterile^{walkie-talkie} 22:32, 16 February 2009 (EST)

Well one rollback now is all it takes for it to return. - User $\scriptstyle h/2\hbar$ 23:28, 16 February 2009 (EST)

Please, I don't mind discussing this. It's probably a good idea and I'm full of shit. I just don't like it. But we can disagree. Sterile^{walkie-talkie} 18:37, 17 February 2009 (EST)

(Or we can just have multiple pages with the same content apparently....) Please discuss. Sterile^{walkie-talkie} 22:38, 19 February 2009 (EST)

Plush toy?

What - if anything - does the reference to a plush toy in a recent RW poll mean? VOX^HUMANA 05:54, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

See Vol 5. After you put your drink down, of course. Peter ^mqzp 05:56, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

Oh my. (I sincerely appreciated the warning about the drink.) VOX^HUMANA 06:20, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

Science

Wow, they've really given up even pretending to be a science journal. It's all scriptual analysis at this point. ^talk 15:54, 31 May 2013 (UTC)

Repeat authorship

Perhaps including what the usual numbers would be would help. The number 70% on its own means little. [[User:K61824|]][[User_talk:K61824|]] 01:41, 16 December 2015 (UTC)