There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with ![]() ![]() |
Talk:Areo Magazine
So[edit]
So this magazine is basically a Quillette knock off? 95.143.195.157 (talk) 22:55, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
- judging by the article author I think its safe to say its closely related with a similar purpose and ideological stance. EK (talk) 23:04, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
- Judging the content of a defamatory article, it might indeed look that way. 80.233.32.252 (talk) 18:13, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
Grievance studies hoax[edit]
Probably should get s brief summary of it in this page. --It's-a me, LeftyGreenMario! 02:54, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
Problematic edit(s) reverted[edit]
[1] There's nothing 'heterodox' about Areo Magazine. Look at some recent articles:
Right-wing talking points - "anti-white" racism, pro-nuclear energy, etc. Boring stuff. Ernor (talk) 17:34, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
What exactly was the problem?[edit]
User Carthage Sock apparently undid my changes. How come? MalAdeptus (talk) 20:54, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- Whitewashing. Such as changing the description of Charles Murray from "racist" to "controversial political scientist". Carthage (talk) 20:58, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- "Racist" is pretty strong. He keeps insisting that he does not view non-whites as inferior in value. But I can restore this if you want. Maybe "commonly associated with racism"? MalAdeptus (talk)
Assuming "Carthage sock" is you, I should say: I undid your edit with the suggestion incorporated. Should I modify something else, too? MalAdeptus (talk) 21:21, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- HAH HAH HAH imagine believing that Charles Murray is not a racist. It's like the man said: "Any serious inquiry into Charles Murray’s actual body of work must conclude that, if Murray is not a racist, the word “racist” is empty of meaning. — Nathan J. Robinson And there is definitely something fishy about this MalAdeptus character. Pinkerite (talk) 01:23, 8 February 2025 (UTC)