Talk:Crop circles

	This Ufology related article has not received a brainstar for quality. Please consider expanding the article appropriately. See RationalWiki:Article rating for more information.

Archives for this talk page:

<1>

, (new)

New research

Was in progress before several years, until now.

Look at sitemap

also photos lightning schematic picture, another lightning schematic picture

main idea of the whole web is, that Crop Circles are created similarly like photo - pictures, by electromagnetic waves radiated by lightnings. Also may appear similar process, like in Wilson Cloud Chamber.

Used only scientific methods of research, and skeptical point of view.

If interested, possible write more, right into the page Crop Circles in this wiki.

contact cropcirclesonline@gmail.com

Alchemist (talk) 21:11, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

Cloud chambers detect ionizing radiation, not electromagnetic waves. Electromagnetic waves cannot create crop circles, unless the crops in question are conductive or magnetic. - Grant (Talk) 23:21, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

Field of research

The article spells it both cereology and cerealogy. Which is correct? Thanos6 (talk) 22:50, 26 July 2014 (UTC)

WP has it as cereology which is good enough for me. Doxys Midnight Runner (talk) 23:11, 26 July 2014 (UTC)

Rrstuv

Why do my changes keep getting reverted. I do not agree that they are counter-productive. Can you explain how or in what way they are counter-productive? rrstuv 01:30, 28 February 2015 (UTC)

My changes are included in the following link [1] ^{— Unsigned, by: Rrstuv / talk / contribs}

An easier way to see your changes is to click the "Fossil record" link at the top of the article page, which takes you here. I do not think canvassing google+ will help your efforts here on RationalWiki. Stick around, and you may get used to the local wiki ways. Alec Sanderson (talk) 02:09, 28 February 2015 (UTC)

p.s. I protected the article for half an hour, with the reason being "counter-productive edit warring." That says nothing about the quality of Rrstuv's changes. It is the edit warring that is considered counter-productive. Alec Sanderson (talk) 02:19, 28 February 2015 (UTC)

Not all Crop circles are Hoaxes

Now I do NOT (any longer) believe in UFOs, nor am I saying that ti's angels, or Bilu, or the annunaki, or any other woo; I'm saying "I have absolutely no idea what made these, but surely these can't be hoaxes?" Isn't it the case that in most crop circles the stalk of the crop has clearly been forcibly bent and folded down such that the plant will die from injury, whereas in other crop circles the crops are still alive, it's just that their stalk now makes as sharp 90 degree turn for some reason, as though it had always grown that way? There are even photos, and sometimes even more weirdness on top of that.

https://www.collective-evolution.com/2017/01/17/astonishing-crop-circles-amaze-researchers/ Skadooshbag (talk) 23:09, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

A better source than some quote mining crank site, please. --Scherben (talk) 21:09, 18 July 2018 (UTC)

The second reference no longer works

Unless you want a fat arse. --Scherben (talk) 20:59, 18 July 2018 (UTC)

It does now. FYI, you can check archive.is and archive.org for a snapshot of a now-dead page. Regards, Cosmikdebris (talk) 21:07, 18 July 2018 (UTC)

Spoilsport 😜 --Scherben (talk) 21:10, 18 July 2018 (UTC)

Relevant?

This about 14.05. Anna Livia (talk) 20:34, 10 December 2021 (UTC)