Talk:Appeal to censorship

Would this be Wikileting or Dewikileting? It seems similar to the Colbert portmanteau Wikiality. --Edgerunner⁷⁶ 14:46, 9 November 2007 (EST)

I'm starting to think that deleting without first commenting should be an instantly blockable offense - especially if done by an IP.--Bob^{bing up} 15:16, 9 November 2007 (EST)

Relocate?

If this is a thin veiled crit of CP, should it go in the CP namespace? If not, it needs extending or vapourising. ArmondikoV^bomination 06:29, 17 February 2009 (EST)

It is also a thin veiled attach on a few of a least favourite trolls. Let it stay. - User $\pi$ 06:47, 17 February 2009 (EST)

It may mention CP, but it really was written to address things that happen here, too. However, perhaps it belongs in the RW space? Is it really a mainspace "article"? ħuman 16:32, 17 February 2009 (EST)

I think this article doesn't belong in the mainspace. It seems too "meta" to really qualify as a normal article. Radioactive afikomen ^{Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.} 16:38, 17 February 2009 (EST)

How about redirecting to Burning the evidence? Or perhaps Conservapedia:Burning the Evidence? Totnesmartin 16:44, 17 February 2009 (EST)

I can't think of any better alternatives, so I'll second your suggestion. Radioactive afikomen ^{Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.} 16:53, 17 February 2009 (EST)

I'm not sure if this is relevant to the discussion, but Gulik dedicated the article to 12.75.66.206. Perusing the bunchofnumber's edits, it seems to have been a global warming denialist. Radioactive afikomen ^{Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.} 16:53, 17 February 2009 (EST)

I think it should just be moved to the RW namespace. As I said, although it mentions CP, it was written about activities here. ħuman 18:04, 17 February 2009 (EST)

Sadly, it applies to just about ANY wiki. I don't know where it should go, personally. --Gulik 23:42, 17 February 2009 (EST)

So why don't we just leave it where it is? ħuman 23:52, 17 February 2009 (EST)

Hey what a unique idea we could have articles in the mainspace. We should try that more often. - User $\pi$ 00:02, 18 February 2009 (EST)

Whodathunkit? ħuman 00:44, 18 February 2009 (EST)

Rewrite

I've started on a re-write, since I agree that this had become a bit too CP-centric. I think that this topic goes way beyond CP and wikis, so I'm going to add some commentary on techniques used in blogs, forums and sites such as YouTube. --^{Ask me about your mother} 17:50, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

Way too inward-focused

This appears mostly to be about RationalWiki-related matters, and the fact it's really talking about Conservapedia shows through.

I'm not too keen on the neologistic name either.

Is there anything about this that doesn't belong at Burning the evidence? - David Gerard (talk) 09:52, 11 August 2016 (UTC)

Nope, I vote for merge. Herr FuzzyKatzenPotato (talk/stalk) 15:12, 11 August 2016 (UTC)