Talk:Do you want to be descended from a monkey?

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search

I kind'a think that there should be a better title for this - but I'm not sure what.--BobSpring is sprung! 19:45, 14 November 2011 (UTC)

Someone is making abunch of articles with random titles that need to be rounded up. B♭maj7 (talk) Anachronistically anachronistic 19:46, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
Sub-section of How come there are still monkeys. Scarlet A.pnggnostic 19:47, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
Could be. Or part of a new article "Questions dumb theists think are clever". Like "How come there are still fish?"--BobSpring is sprung! 20:05, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
Oooh, I can definitely see that as quite an awesome category. Scarlet A.pngmoral 20:08, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
Yeah - but it works better as an article title. Otherwise we get articles titled like this one. --BobSpring is sprung! 20:13, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
Good point. Perhaps dumb questions and make a bit of a project of it. Scarlet A.pngsshole 20:16, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
> Forum:EvoWiki ports Blue Talk 20:17, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
This shouldn't be in how come there are still monkeys because it's a completely different stupid question about monkeys. It should be included as an example in argument from adverse consequences, with Rev Moon's quote (from here) & a short explanation of why it's silly. We don't need the rest of this, which is just a series of laboured counterexamples appealing to the same fallacy. WéáśéĺóíďWeaselly.jpgMethinks it is a Weasel 18:24, 15 November 2011 (UTC)

Do you want to descend from a monkey? No; having ascended this monkey, I am enjoying the ride. Giddyup ! WēāŝēīōīďWeaselly.jpgMethinks it is a Weasel 02:05, 15 November 2011 (UTC)

Well, holding onto their tails are useful when descending, but I must say, when descending from monkeys, be careful of random droppings. (at least the title could be well written. This doesn't bode well for EvoWiki. grins)Pink mowse.pngGodotMoi j'dis, laisse beton 23:03, 15 November 2011 (UTC)

'Depends upon the monkey' :) (talk) 17:23, 11 October 2016 (UTC)

Delete tag.[edit]

I do want to see this disappear. it's embarrassing. Ken-like in substance. B♭maj7 (talk) Anachronistically anachronistic 22:59, 15 November 2011 (UTC)

The best thing is the weasel's comment above. Burn. Тytalk 23:02, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
Aye. Sam Tally-ho! 23:04, 15 November 2011 (UTC)

Anyone here[edit]

object to being related to [1] or [2]? (Search 'cute monkey' on the web for more - you know you want to). (talk) 22:10, 7 August 2017 (UTC)