Information icon.svg Nominations and campaigning for the RationalWiki 2021 Moderator Election are completed. Voting is live now, until 17:00 UTC, 30 November!


From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Icon philosophy.svg

This hypocrisy related article has not received a brainstar for quality. Please consider expanding the article appropriately. See RationalWiki:Article rating for more information.

Editorial notes
  • Possibly requires a considerable rewrite, explaining what it is without odd examples.
  • Bipartisan section needs attention.

Keeping Palin away from her kids might be the best thing for them. Jollyfish.gifГенгисRationalWiki GOLD member 14:01, 2 September 2008 (EDT)

Hehe... we're gonna have a hell of time "past tensing" all this sort of thing after the elections... ħumanUser talk:Human 19:33, 19 October 2008 (EDT)
Palin's children are grown up, aren't they? --Idiot number 59 (talk) 09:33, 9 July 2010 (UTC)


... rides on a crocodile (according to Shelley)— Unsigned, by: / talk / contribs

Bipartisan, hmmm?[edit]

The Bipartisan section of the article is criticizing feminists for something it admits it has no evidence that any feminists have actually said. Which means that, considering who the original statement actually comes from, it contains one example of conservative hypocrisy and one misattributed example of conservative hypocrisy.

I move that we either find a real example of liberal hypocrisy or, if we can't, take down the bipartisan section. (talk) 22:58, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

That's partially my fault. Before, there was attribution to feminists and a fact template. I removed the template by mentioning that it seemed more misattribution, but failed to notice and thus change the heading. I'm sure examples of liberal hypocrisy are not difficult to come by. ThunderkatzHo! 23:26, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
Possibly not the best examples anyway, to be fair. ADK...I'll discombobulate your dystopia! 00:02, 26 July 2011 (UTC)