User talk:Idiot number 59

What is going on? World Blogs Clogs Elections The Bar (talk) (talk) (talk) (talk) (hic) Welcome to RationalWiki, Idiot number 59! Check out our guide for newcomers and our community standards! Tell us how you found RationalWiki here! If you are interested in contributing: Read what our articles are intended to be Check out the to-do list See our help page and Wikipedia's formatting cheatsheet If writing a new article, consider writing up a draft And most importantly: Pull up a goat and have some fun!

Hi! 14:49, 3 July 2010 (UTC)

Welcome to RationalWiki, enjoy your stay! - David Gerard (talk) 14:51, 3 July 2010 (UTC)

Who are numbers 1-58? --The Emperor _{Kneel before Zod!} 20:56, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

Started with a heinzerisation by me There were no 1 - 56. 21:07, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

What are you doing here? rational^hi

Having fun of course. Aren't everyone else doing the same thing, but just pretending to be up to something else? --Idiot number 59 (talk) 18:28, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

An Idiot's Love

The local Idiot

Whose love composed

The lovely essense

Of the love that he exposed.

It was made to be known,

That the Idiot did indeed,

Love Susan so dearly,

But did Susan accede?

Alas, she did not,

She did not give any favor,

To the man who loved her

As he cried with waver...

"WHY?!" cried the Idiot,

So solemnly sad.

How could she not love

A six toed man? That's too bad.

Silently, he shuddered away

Carrying out his love from his userpage.

But deep within his heart, everyone knows,

That his love is still there, it's just in a doze.

~SuperHamster Talk 05:35, 13 August 2010 (UTC)

A strange poem. I wish people wrote me more poems, but not such like you did. It doesn't qualify as a poem. You could learn something from my earlier works. --Idiot number 58 (talk) 05:43, 13 August 2010 (UTC)

My poem may be strange to some wacky fools, but what you just said is downright insane. You call my work a poem twice, then you proceed to say that it isn't. GET IT TOGETHER MAN. ~SuperHamster Talk 05:46, 13 August 2010 (UTC)

Chicken coop proceedings

A discussion about you has been started at RationalWiki:Chicken coop, regarding some of your behavior. If you wish to advocate for yourself you had best go there. Radioactive afikomen ^{Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.} 02:39, 14 August 2010 (UTC)

Sysop

Remember, power from the cabal to lord over the people is a goat-given right of Man. --The Emperor _{Kneel before Zod!} 03:17, 14 August 2010 (UTC)

Good to see you again!

Blue (pester) 22:10, 27 November 2010 (UTC)

Oh! And why do you think I'll stay in this godless idiocracy? --Idiot number 59 (talk) 09:08, 29 November 2010 (UTC)

Because you might just learn something about how pointless such statements as that are.Several ingredients (talk) 09:21, 29 November 2010 (UTC)

@Idiot59: I dunno; why wouldn't you stay in this godless idiocracy? We has goats! Blue (pester) 12:13, 29 November 2010 (UTC)

You stay to reinforce your feeling of superiority. You need someone to despise and we fit the bill. Jack Hughes (talk) 12:36, 29 November 2010 (UTC)

Assholes. --Idiot number 59 (talk) 16:53, 29 November 2010 (UTC)

You can haz sysop back, okay? Blue (is useful) 19:33, 30 November 2010 (UTC)

Honey, you've always seemed to be the most reasonable person out of all progressive ethicists here. Thank you. --Idiot number 59 (talk) 10:36, 18 December 2010 (UTC)

Aww. *blushes* No problem. Blue (is useful) 05:01, 21 December 2010 (UTC)

You're on thin ice.

Ad hominem attacks are most unwelcome on this wiki, your actions here involve you telling someone to "go f*** themself" and calling someone a "stupid pig". Continuing to be disrespectful to other editors may result in a block without warning. I'm watching you.Several ingredients (talk) 23:32, 22 December 2010 (UTC)

Continuing to be disrespectful to other edits may result in a block without warning. I'm watching you. May I point out that threats like this are as unwelcome as the Ad hominem themselves? Ace Mc^fuckingAwesome 00:17, 23 December 2010 (UTC)

Yes, thank you, Ace. The person doing the blocking would be the one breaching policy, not the one making insulting comments. Blue (pester) 01:40, 23 December 2010 (UTC)

And 59 is a sysop, so a block wouldn't be very effective anyway... Blue (pester) 01:41, 23 December 2010 (UTC)

I can change that. User:Nutty Roux/sigtalk 01:46, 23 December 2010 (UTC)

There's nothing wrong with being insulting, really - he's pretty rude, but not particularly disruptive. People as dumb as him deserve a little tolerance and leeway, and hopefully eventually a loving home where caretakers can wipe the pureed food off his chin and gently rock him to sleep..--^talk 02:31, 23 December 2010 (UTC)

Hanlon's razor applies here. Still, if Idiot number 59 is just going to hang around to stir people up i.e be a troll, then s/he would deserve some kind of punishment.Several ingredients (talk) 05:42, 23 December 2010 (UTC)

Stupid pig. --Idiot number 59 (talk) 10:43, 23 December 2010 (UTC)

1. Let's not bring back that argument over something this trivial 2. Don't Feed The Fucking Troll 3. Whether or not 59 is a troll is up for debate. Blue (is useful) 11:48, 23 December 2010 (UTC)

You know what else applies? You being a grown-up and ignoring the troll rather than giving him the gratification of a debate on his talk page. Think McFly! -- Iscariot ^{Andy Schlafly for Congress 2012!} 06:31, 23 December 2010 (UTC)

I'm definitely not trying to feed the troll, I originally thought the user was some kind of unfunny editor with quirky properties. But, now that I know s/he's a troll I'll have the right impression.Several ingredients (talk) 11:01, 23 December 2010 (UTC)

Oh come on guys. I guess if you don't know the history then idiot #59 seems offensive but he's kept his Toretts pretty much under control recently and become a useful member of the community. Offensive, that's just his way. Jack Hughes (talk) 11:20, 23 December 2010 (UTC)

Indeed. Did you know my name was originally FuckingVandal? --Idiot number 59 (talk) 11:54, 24 December 2010 (UTC)

I don't see what's inherently wrong with "FuckingVandal," but others do, apparently. I could give you FrackingVandal, but I'm a huge nerd, so that might resonate with me more than you. Blue (is useful) 08:55, 26 December 2010 (UTC)

"Fuck poser"

Why do I think you are now picturing Avril in some kind of porno? The Spikey Punk ^{I'm punking my punk!} 19:29, 1 January 2011 (UTC)

As a devoted Catholic I never do such things. Avril is one of the few decent artist, whose music videos don't remind me of sex tapes. --Idiot number 59 (talk) 19:34, 1 January 2011 (UTC)

Welcoming

Please stop saying you're chief admin or whatever when welcoming users. The welcome can be a very important thing, not to be taken as lightly as other "procedures" here. Blue (pester) 00:12, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

Hey

Did you died? --Idiot numbre 188 (talk) 19:43, 19 February 2011 (UTC)