Naturally good for you
Main article is flawed. Written with straw man argument, etc
The article has logical fallacies in it. No natural food company is suggesting to put natural toxins, natural poop into foods. Thus the article is based on straw man arguments, etc. --22.214.171.124 (talk) 00:14, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
If we accept that "a chemical company's toxic waste is completely natural"
Flawed logic, few people accept that "a chemical company's toxic waste is natural"
Your argument is totally flawed. Toxic waste is often from toxic plants that do not use organic, naturally occurring products in their production/manufacturing processes. For your flawed argument to not be so flawed you'd have to utilize a manufacturing plant that uses organic, natural, non-artificial products/ items and then the output would be valid in such an argument. --126.96.36.199 (talk) 00:18, 20 May 2019 (UTC)