Information icon.svg At All things in moderation, we are currently voting on restrictions on the use of LLMs (chatbots) in RationalWiki. Reminder: you need to have at least 75 edits and to have been registered for at least three months to be eligible to vote.

Talk:People's Quantitative Easing

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Is there some intention to create something other than a garbage-stub entirely based on one pun here? ikanreed You probably didn't deserve that 19:27, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

Well, much like other economics articles, determinate if it is a dumb idea or not. But of course, I see you are trying to make the article better, instead of whining. Diacelium (talk) 19:55, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
There's no particular reason to believe that a shitty one-off talking point will ever go anywhere? It seems more likely that you made an article about the name of something, had no insight, the thing in question wasn't really a big policy, and you're... kinda just cluttering up the wiki. I wanted to know if you the creator, had any intention of finding some substance. My personal inclination is to nuke it, but I wanted to... you know, give you a chance, in case I was missing something. ikanreed You probably didn't deserve that 21:29, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
It would be better if you could spend some effort doing the hard work of making pages better than Wikipedia, rather than the easy work making a series of stubs (e.g., Économistes Atterrés, Yanis Varoufakis, Currency competition). Bongolian (talk) 21:41, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
This policy seems to be a big policy if it got to the point of people calling him economically illiterate for that. I'm trying to expand the article.
Also, Sorry about the Économistes Atterrés article. It was useless, I'll try not to make useless articles again. Diacelium (talk) 23:06, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
My news searches may just be messed up then. I certainly don't claim to know it's unimportant, just that I couldn't find anything suggesting it was important. Corbyn's an odd case with respect to media though. ikanreed You probably didn't deserve that 23:13, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

I'm with Ikanreed. The last person here who had a decent knowledge of economics left long ago. RW is better off if it doesn't try to be a shitty Wikipedia clone.--ZooGuard (talk) 21:14, 23 January 2017 (UTC)