|
Nominations and Campaigning for the 2024 RationalWiki Moderator Election are now open |
Talk:Science doesn't know everything
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
I feel like this is duplicating something. oʇɐʇoԀʇɐϽʎzznℲ (talk/stalk) 20:26, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
- Probably could be merged into something else. Going to be a bit sparse here... CorruptUser (talk) 20:28, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
- [EC] Well, I did find:
- And some outside sources:
- But I couldn't find any duplicates here. FuzzyDogPotato (talk/stalk) 20:31, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
- I like the page and the rationale for the page tho. =) FuzzyDogPotato (talk/stalk) 20:31, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
- Nice work on this one. The section in Creationist escape hatch should be digested into this and highly summarised there - David Gerard (talk) 20:56, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
The attempts at reducing it to a formal structure[edit]
are cringeworthy. Why do people insist on doing that?--ZooGuard (talk) 20:40, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
- I like 'em. It's interesting and useful to untangle the precise structure of the bad thinking going on in a fallacious argument - David Gerard (talk) 11:15, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
One definition of science is[edit]
...'Science doesn't know everything' (and never will) - and there is more to heaven and earth than in our philosophy (and it would be boring if this were not so). 86.191.125.180 (talk) 22:03, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
Parallel article[edit]
Anyone care to write the article on 'Religion doesn't know everything'? (I don't know enough theological theorising to do so.) Anna Livia (talk) 09:43, 19 April 2018 (UTC)