Talk:Singapore

	This Asia related article has been awarded BRONZE status for quality. It's getting there, but could be better with improvement. See RationalWiki:Article rating for more information.

PAP

can u do more research on the pap i need to now more dirt on them^{— Unsigned, by: Orthodoxnow16 / talk / contribs}

thanks for the info on operation cold store. do more research on the workers party in Singapore. censorship in media and meritocracy. elaborate more pap murdering people. critical analysis on channel media corp. Orthodoxnow16 16:32, 16 May 2009 (UTC)orthodoxnow16

Form of Government

Wrong, Singapore is not a one party republic, that's just insulting, it is a draconian semi-utopia!

Disneyland, if it was run by an OCD megalomaniac that had the power to make insubordinates disappear! So, Disneyland. CorruptUser (talk) 14:47, 12 May 2015 (UTC)

Disappointed

Disappointed to see such a heavy anti-Singapore slant for this article on Rationalwiki when compared to say, Wikipedia. I would not consider this article an accurate take on Singapore ^{— Unsigned, by: 103.224.116.235 / talk / contribs}

Well, they don't call it singarich do they? ikanreed ^{🐐Bleat at me} 16:48, 2 August 2019 (UTC)

For the BoN (103.224.116.235), I have now added some historical background that should explain this better. Bongolian (talk) 06:17, 29 February 2020 (UTC)

Silver-level

I'd like to think the article is *at least* silver level now. Not sure how it would qualify based on country articles. Anyone with more experience in accessing articles could enlighten me. Countries that have been classified as silver at the moment seems to be Iran and North Korea. Poczer (talk) 21:10, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

A message on a talk page won’t get much attention, use {{demote}}. Christopher (talk) 21:24, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

Corruption Index

The page displays "9.3" which is extremely corrupt. ^{— Unsigned, by: Dave Wise 2 / talk / contribs}

I removed it. The index may have a flawed methodology and the number did not agree with the WP page. Bongolian (talk) 18:31, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

I have no idea where that 9.3 figure came from, could be some old forgotten vandalism. Anyways, the correct number is 85. Poczer (talk) 06:37, 27 April 2021 (UTC)