Talk:Transpersonal psychology

Psychology or pseudoscience?

@HairlessCat Given the TP is fundamentally based upon a pseudocientific concept (Freud's concept of the ego[1]), no you can't make this into a legitimate field of research or practice, as you seem to be attempting to do. Furthermore, you did not give any citations when you attempted to change the character of this page. Bongolian (talk) 02:16, 3 November 2020 (UTC)

https://www.google.com/search?q=define+ego&oq=define+ego&aqs=chrome..69i57j0l7.2567j1j9&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8 HairlessCat (talk) 02:20, 3 November 2020 (UTC)

I'll get some citations the next time I edit here. HairlessCat (talk) 02:24, 3 November 2020 (UTC)

You should read our Freud and Jung pages. You probably have a lot to disagree with there too. Bongolian (talk) 02:26, 3 November 2020 (UTC)

@HairlessCat You did not provide citations as you said that you would. You are merely edit warring and whitewashing. Bongolian (talk) 03:05, 24 December 2020 (UTC)

Perhaps when you get citations for the false garbage that was already in the text. Also pedantically fixed dumb grammar. @Bongolian HairlessCat (talk) 03:19, 24 December 2020 (UTC)

This article does have legitimate problems: the one that struck out the most to me being that it mostly consists of quotations. — Oxyaena ^Harass 04:21, 24 December 2020 (UTC)