Talk:Tulsi Gabbard

	This United States politics related article has not received a brainstar for quality. Please consider expanding the article appropriately. See RationalWiki:Article rating for more information.

This article contains information about one or more living persons. Articles about living people must be handled carefully, because they are more open to legal threats. Reference any contentious allegations solidly; unreferenced allegations should be removed. If legal threats are raised on this page, please direct the potential litigant to RationalWiki:Legal FAQ; do not interact with them.

Archives for this talk page:

<1>

, (new)

"whose recent reputation as a left winger is wholly undeserved"

What a stupid sentence. No wonder, because this is site is run by neo-liberal centrists who want to drone children worldwide and murder Julian Assange for exposing corruption. ^{— Unsigned, by: 73.161.214.42 / talk}

Repeat much?

Why do the final two paragraphs appear twice? And who is this "he" with which she is running a charity? For that matter, with the present text, not clear at all why Indians would be obvious supporters. It looks like someone deleted content and didn't tidy up. And somehow duplicated two paragraphs. This article is a mess. I mean more than most rational wiki articles. 69.250.3.219 (talk) 00:55, 16 January 2019 (UTC)

I think I've fixed the problems you've raised. By the way, you should add new topics to the bottom of talk pages. Thanks. CowHouse (talk) 05:13, 18 January 2019 (UTC)

"Russian Asset"

She's just being attacked in this manner for sharing some of the same positions that progressives did in 2015. They, pawns of the former Soviet Union and frequent hosts to their infiltrators, have no right to make such a claim.186.120.152.225 (talk) 02:13, 13 December 2019 (UTC)(Krashlia)

I have no words for this level of stupidity. You are wrong on so many levels I've lost count. ☭Comrade GC☭^{Ministry of Praise} 02:21, 13 December 2019 (UTC)

Truman, Kennedy, and LBJ were famously great friends of global communism and the Soviet Union. /s 🎄Chef Moosolini’s Ristorante Italiano🎄^{Ask about our holiday specials!} 03:18, 13 December 2019 (UTC)

On another angle entirely, Gabbard has spoken out against the extradition of Julian Assange, claiming it would suppress freedom of the press. It is unknown what connection, if any, Gabbard has with Russian interests. However that she opposes extradition of Assange to America on 1st amendment grounds is suspicious, as he is ostensibly a Russian asset. If he has 1st amendment rights, they would be held up in court.Ariel31459 (talk) 16:43, 30 December 2019 (UTC)

The category 'Leftists turned right with age'

I disagree with it for a couple reasons: 1. She was never really that progressive but because she endorsed Bernie in 2016 everyone thought that she was some kind of leftist. 2. She is apart of a literal cult with that right-wing alignments and honestly I have no idea why we don't have an article on it. A somebody. (talk) 22:11, 28 August 2024 (UTC)

Her father and Hare Krishnas

If I'm remembering correctly, the group wasn't a break away from ISKCON (the hare krishnas), but rather a "charismatic" new-age NRM (i.e. cult) that was absorbed into ISKCON. ^{— Unsigned, by: 169.231.214.21 / talk / contribs}