User talk:A somebody.

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
New logo large.png Welcome to RationalWiki, A somebody.!

Check out our guide for newcomers and our community standards!

Tell us how you found RationalWiki here!

If you are interested in contributing:

Blue (is useful) 00:14, 24 May 2023 (UTC)

Edit war[edit]

Hello. If you got this, I’d like to have a chill chat about why you disagree that Zoroastrian fascism cannot materialize, and get over the misunderstanding you have.Rational Dude (talk) 23:22, 28 May 2023 (UTC)

Alright, so to start off there is only ten thousand people Zoroastrians in iran, compared to tens of millions of Shia muslims, but religious minorities have managed to rule over the religious majority you say, and alright fair enough. But however, there is actually zero sources saying that all of those Neo nazi sites are promoting Zoroastrianism, Hell a bunch of them are ran by one now 30 year old Shia muslim guy. A somebody. (talk) 23:34, 28 May 2023 (UTC)
Like A somebody says, it's a matter of making controversial claims without proper sources. Some of the edits to the sumka and davud articles seem to have unsolicited conjecture and opinion in them, which we should strive to avoid here, especially if those claims are controversial. I'm sure that we all would like our articles to be as factual as possible and we're willing to help. But you have to be careful about reading something in to the scant source material that just isn't there. —cosmikdebris talk stalk 00:38, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
I didn’t say the neo nazi sites promoted Zoroastrianism, I said that some nazi sites in Iran are being frequented by the younger generation who hate Islam and are part of other religions, such as Zoroastrianism. And they seek vengeance against Islam similar to hindutva supporters in India. In addition, the current number of Zoroastrians worldwide is estimated to be currently 200,000 and growing/increasing in considerable numbers according to some sources (mostly because of reversions from groups that were originally Zoroastrian as well as welcoming converts from the newer generation of Zoroastrians who are more accepting than the older generation). I have some sources to back this up.
Also, I did not find any sources about the nazi imam you keep mentioning, nor did I find the website or the book you mentioned as well. And at first you said that the imam was 20, and now you say he’s 30. Are you sure you’re not fabricating claims? Rational Dude (talk) 03:30, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
I made a mistake due to my faulty memory, however he IS a Shia and this is the source I pulled the quote from A somebody. (talk) 20:32, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
and I said 'now a 30 year old' was because he was 20 at the source, and now he is 32 presumably. A somebody. (talk) 20:38, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
I see. In any case, if there is actual information on an Islamophobic Zoroastrian nationalist fascist group, I will not hesitate to add it here, and you cannot accuse me of fabricating anything. Rational Dude (talk) 01:04, 30 May 2023 (UTC)


You're a sysop now. GeeJayKWhere all evil dwells Where every lie is true 21:28, 12 June 2023 (UTC)

Thank you I guess. A somebody. (talk) 21:30, 12 June 2023 (UTC)


Do you think you could assist me with drafts? I need sources that’s aren’t readily available to add to articles that are currently drafts. Rational Dude (talk) 22:32, 12 June 2023 (UTC)

I'm not a man who really makes big bold edits, I'm not really good at finding sources either sorry. A somebody. (talk) 22:36, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
It’s fine. But if you have any sources for Iranian fascism, please do make sure to share them with me. Rational Dude (talk) 22:37, 12 June 2023 (UTC)

Revision deletion[edit]

It's only to be used for things like doxing or libel that could get us into legal trouble. Using it on ordinary troll revisions is an abuse of sysop rights. Plutocow (talk) 00:40, 13 June 2023 (UTC)


Did you use a logged out alt? Rational Dude (talk) 00:28, 15 June 2023 (UTC)

No. A somebody. (talk) 00:45, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
I meant the user who undid my edit before. Rational Dude (talk) 00:52, 15 June 2023 (UTC)

Category removal[edit]

Wasn’t Stalin a pedo? The same category is on the article for Hitler and Mao as well. Rational Dude (talk) 22:15, 16 June 2023 (UTC)

I don't think he was, either was Hitler or Mao, so I think it should be removed for all of them. A somebody. (talk) 22:17, 16 June 2023 (UTC)

Timothy Snyder[edit]

Can you explain what your problem with Timothy Snyder is? He is highly regarded in Europe. I know that his Bloodlands book has received some critical reviews. He's also been criticized for prognosticating, but so what: Prognostications by anyone should be taken with a grain of salt. Bongolian (talk) 18:17, 20 June 2023 (UTC)

Bloodlands alone should have discarded anything he has to say about anything really, I don't really like double genocide idiots such as Snyder. A somebody. (talk) 18:35, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
Are you denying Stalin's involvement in the Holodomor or are you criticizing moral equivalence between Stalin and Hitler that you perceive in Bloodlands that some non-historians have claimed? Snyder is hardly an "idiot" as you say. Unless you can show that there are systematic or specific problems with Snyder's later work, you have a poor argument for mass-deleting Snyder as you seem to be proceeding to do. Bongolian (talk) 19:59, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
1. That is not what double genocide is.
2. I am not denying Stalin's invlovement in the Holodomer, I am denying the double genocide theory which Synder helps promote via his batshit book. A somebody. (talk) 21:17, 20 June 2023 (UTC)


Hey. There's a tankie by the name of pottergarry going around here, denying genocide and making rape apologia. If they comment on your talk page, don't let them get away with their propaganda. Rational Dude (talk) 10:57, 13 July 2023 (UTC)

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Steve Bannon[edit]

'Ello. Wanted to ask about the "Steve bannon still didn't draft him btw"? (っ◔◡◔)っ ♥ Natsuki Marx ♥ (talk) 09:34, 16 July 2023 (UTC)

Steve Bannon is a washed up Far-right political strategist, ever since he failed to get that alabama pedophile elected he has taken L after L, so I heavily doubt he drafted RFK jr to run against biden. A somebody. (talk) 17:24, 16 July 2023 (UTC)

What is your problem[edit]

Rough storm pirate.png Ahoy, matey!
Beware, for there be a great sea of
Concern Troll Bullshit ahead!

Jonathan Kane is not a nazi. I know him well, he is published in peer-review. Who are you? Why are you harassing him? Whatgives (talk) 23:44, 27 July 2023 (UTC)

Ok I will use his preferred term of Libertaryan instead. A somebody. (talk) 00:48, 28 July 2023 (UTC)

All things in moderation[edit]

A case involving you has been raised at All things in moderation. Feel free to comment. GeeJayKWhere all evil dwells Where every lie is true 16:35, 31 July 2023 (UTC)

Unblock me please[edit]

Hello yes, I would like to apologize to the moderators for my outbust of anger and I would like to please be unblocked. A somebody. (talk) 18:20, 31 July 2023 (UTC)

Just for all the bullshit you've been up to lately[edit]

Rainbow trout transparent.png Whack!
You've been whacked with a wet trout.

Don't take this too seriously. Somebody just wants to let you know you did something silly.

Yes, GeeJayK was harsh in terms of unilaterally sysoprevoking you, but your immaturity at ATIM, whitewashing brutal regimes, and edit warring is really making you look like an ass. Please calm down. Plutocow (talk) 00:05, 1 August 2023 (UTC)

I was not immature in ATIM, I called him two names (gay BY FUCKING ACCIDENT), and the Ancien regime was still far more brutal than whatever the Jacobins did. A somebody. (talk) 00:06, 1 August 2023 (UTC)


Jumping Humpback whale.jpg


You've been squished by a whale!
Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know you did something really silly.

Yeah no their petty, pointless, and stupid bullshit merits this reward instead. Carthage (talk) 00:19, 1 August 2023 (UTC)

Edit warring[edit]

Rainbow trout transparent.png Whack!
You've been whacked with a wet trout.

Don't take this too seriously. Somebody just wants to let you know you did something silly.

You should really know better by now and that you should take disputes to the talkpage rather than edit warring. You're already blocked from editing two pages, if you start an edit war on a third you will probably get a sitewide block. Plutocow (talk) 18:52, 4 September 2023 (UTC)

Tell me how NAFO is not a harassment group pretending to be an online movement? A somebody. (talk) 18:55, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
I HAD taken the french revolution thing to the talk page, and when no one listened YOUR talk page but still nobody fucking listened. A somebody. (talk) 19:05, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
We're not listening because we've had the exact same conversation with you like twice before and you're still wrong. Pizza SLICE.gifChef Moosolini’s Ristorante ItalianoMake a Reservation 20:40, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
Wrong? How am I wrong? The jacobins did abolish slavery, they did abolish the death penalty for heresy and sodomy. Unless you would like to dispute historical fact. A somebody. (talk) 21:41, 4 September 2023 (UTC)

The Boer[edit]

OK, I give up, what is the reference you're referring to with "The Boer Musk"; I know he's a Boer, but otherwise? Bongolian (talk) 05:08, 19 September 2023 (UTC)

he is a white south african. A somebody. (talk) 19:21, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
Personally I'm partial to "Ellen Musket." Carthage (talk) 10:43, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
Yeah, I knew that. I thought you meant something in addition to that. Not all White South Africans are Boers by the way, just the Dutch descendants. Musk is Boer through his father's side. Bongolian (talk) 02:13, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
The reason I call him The Boer is because I don't want to call him Elon musk + he's racist, anti-semitic, and a neo nazi. So you know just normal Boer things. A somebody. (talk) 05:14, 20 September 2023 (UTC)


You're there again. GeeJayKWhere all evil dwells Where every lie is true 21:02, 25 October 2023 (UTC)

For continuing to do shit that got you blocked before[edit]

Rainbow trout transparent.png Whack!
You've been whacked with a wet trout.

Don't take this too seriously. Somebody just wants to let you know you did something silly.

Will you ever learn? Plutocow (talk) 00:30, 26 October 2023 (UTC)

Interaction ban[edit]

This is a formal notice that you are hereby banned from interacting with User:Carthage.

Specifically, you are banned from doing the following actions:

  • Edit their user talk page. This extends to subpages in their userspace and essay talkpages.
  • Reply to them in discussions. Participation in the same discussions is still permitted, but direct responses are not.
  • Reference them anywhere on RationalWiki, directly or indirectly.
  • Revert their edits in any shape, way or form through the MediaWiki interface.

This sanction can be enforced by any sysop with incrementing blocks and attached talk page notices. Repeated violation may result in another Chicken coop or ATIM case being raised against you with the potential for further sanctions.
Plutocow (talk) 21:28, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

Please wait for it to be confirmed if someone is actually dead[edit]

This isn't just something pedantic, it's something we have to do to avoid BLP issues. Yes, Raisi is likely dead, but the correct thing to do is wait for it to be confirmed before changing the article. Plutocow (talk) 05:03, 20 May 2024 (UTC)

My standards for if someone is actually dead is to check the wikipedia page, and if it says they are dead and it isn't reversed, I make the change, also it was already confirmed. A somebody. (talk) 14:07, 20 May 2024 (UTC)

For the repetitive category work[edit]

You're now RW:NINJA, so you can properly play the part of a substitute for a bot. I marked you as 'bot' too as you're currently making more than 50+ changes already for a category, so it stops flooding recent changes. That goes away in 1 day if you don't change it. See here. Mark/unmark yourself 'bot' there according to whether or not you're currently doing many repetitive, completely uncontroversial edits that may otherwise flood recent changes. --ApooftGnegiol (talk)