User talk:A somebody.
ATIM[edit]
You're there again. GeeJayKWhere all evil dwells Where every lie is true 21:02, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
For continuing to do shit that got you blocked before[edit]
![]() |
Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Somebody just wants to let you know you did something silly. |
Will you ever learn? Plutocow (talk) 00:30, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
Interaction ban[edit]
This is a formal notice that you are hereby banned from interacting with User:Carthage.
Specifically, you are banned from doing the following actions:
- Edit their user talk page. This extends to subpages in their userspace and essay talkpages.
- Reply to them in discussions. Participation in the same discussions is still permitted, but direct responses are not.
- Reference them anywhere on RationalWiki, directly or indirectly.
- Revert their edits in any shape, way or form through the MediaWiki interface.
This sanction can be enforced by any sysop with incrementing blocks and attached talk page notices. Repeated violation may result in another Chicken coop or ATIM case being raised against you with the potential for further sanctions.
Plutocow (talk) 21:28, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
Please wait for it to be confirmed if someone is actually dead[edit]
This isn't just something pedantic, it's something we have to do to avoid BLP issues. Yes, Raisi is likely dead, but the correct thing to do is wait for it to be confirmed before changing the article. Plutocow (talk) 05:03, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- My standards for if someone is actually dead is to check the wikipedia page, and if it says they are dead and it isn't reversed, I make the change, also it was already confirmed. A somebody. (talk) 14:07, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
For the repetitive category work[edit]
You're now RW:NINJA, so you can properly play the part of a substitute for a bot. I marked you as 'bot' too as you're currently making more than 50+ changes already for a category, so it stops flooding recent changes. That goes away in 1 day if you don't change it. See here. Mark/unmark yourself 'bot' there according to whether or not you're currently doing many repetitive, completely uncontroversial edits that may otherwise flood recent changes. --ApooftGnegiol (talk)
Sysop rights[edit]
If you want them back, I'd back you. GeeJayKWhere all evil dwells Where every lie is true 15:37, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
For again continuing the same edits that you previously got blocked for[edit]
Smash!
You've been squished by a whale!
Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know you did something really silly.
The talk page exists for a reason. Removing content from pages that you don’t agree with, such as Greater Israel got you blocked in the past. 2607:FB90:390B:8B90:9065:1CB7:738:6820 (talk) 01:57, 13 August 2025 (UTC)
- I went to THE TALK PAGE to express my opinion that the article was dogshit, and because nobody did anything about it I removed it. A somebody. (talk) 05:06, 13 August 2025 (UTC)
- Still, you didn’t get consensus and since it was an opinion, it still doesn’t give you carte blanche to remove content because you disagree with the page. Your opinion’s not fact and I’d have to bring it up to ATIM if I wasn’t a BoN. 2607:FB90:390B:8B90:9065:1CB7:738:6820 (talk) 05:26, 13 August 2025 (UTC)
- How am I supposed to get consensus when nobody will come to talk page to discuss it? A somebody. (talk) 05:51, 13 August 2025 (UTC)
- You can edit the article without vandalizing it like you did. If you think that the article is beyond repair, you can Afd it. GeeJayKWhere all evil dwells Where every lie is true 14:42, 13 August 2025 (UTC)
- Yes, this conspiracy theory is morphing into a de facto govt policy. But as Gee says, you add a section detailing this and using good refs etc. KarmaPolice (talk) 14:44, 15 August 2025 (UTC)
- You can edit the article without vandalizing it like you did. If you think that the article is beyond repair, you can Afd it. GeeJayKWhere all evil dwells Where every lie is true 14:42, 13 August 2025 (UTC)
- How am I supposed to get consensus when nobody will come to talk page to discuss it? A somebody. (talk) 05:51, 13 August 2025 (UTC)
- Still, you didn’t get consensus and since it was an opinion, it still doesn’t give you carte blanche to remove content because you disagree with the page. Your opinion’s not fact and I’d have to bring it up to ATIM if I wasn’t a BoN. 2607:FB90:390B:8B90:9065:1CB7:738:6820 (talk) 05:26, 13 August 2025 (UTC)