There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff – we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity.
If everyone who saw this today donated $5, we would meet our goal for 2020.
| Fighting pseudoscience isn't free.|
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $20 or whatever you can today with !
Talk:Why can't I own a Canadian?
- Here it is: "The article claims that our objective intuitive morality shows that homosexuality is evil, and a very bad kind of evil. I say they're full of shit." (See my user page.) LiberalOfAnUnknownVariant (talk) 21:50, 21 September 2012 (UTC)
- Yeah, I'd go with "full of shit" as a counter-argument too. Some points don't need addressing, you just need to demonstrate clearly that they weren't even a counter-argument to begin with, which is usually far easier than refutation - hence a colour scheme can come in handy. d hominem 17:31, 22 September 2012 (UTC)