Talk:Why can't I own a Canadian?

	This Bible related article has been awarded BRONZE status for quality. It's getting there, but could be better with improvement. See RationalWiki:Article rating for more information.

Topic

Blue (pester) 04:28, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

LOL! Kirk Johnson (talk) 07:45, 8 June 2011 (UTC)

I'd love to see a counter-counter-argument to that counter-argument at tektonics.org. - LucidFox (talk) 17:17, 11 September 2011 (UTC)

Here it is: "The article claims that our objective intuitive morality shows that homosexuality is evil, and a very bad kind of evil. I say they're full of shit." (See my user page.) LiberalOfAnUnknownVariant (talk) 21:50, 21 September 2012 (UTC)

Yeah, I'd go with "full of shit" as a counter-argument too. Some points don't need addressing, you just need to demonstrate clearly that they weren't even a counter-argument to begin with, which is usually far easier than refutation - hence a colour scheme can come in handy. ^{d hominem} 17:31, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

This text was used almost word for word on an episode of the "West Wing". Does anyone know which came first? VOX^HUMANA 03:13, 25 September 2012 (UTC)

The West Wing came second. ^gnostic 06:21, 25 September 2012 (UTC)

Funniest

This is the funniest article on RationalWiki, simply because the subject is utterly hilarious. Any other candidates? --159.65.94.189 (talk) 03:15, 4 March 2018 (UTC)

Own-able Canadians

These. Anna Livia (talk) 18:04, 4 July 2019 (UTC)

Was there any response from dear Laura? ^{— Unsigned, by: 5.128.33.17 / talk / contribs}