There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with ![]() ![]() |
Talk:Why can't I own a Canadian?
Topic[edit]
Blue (pester) 04:28, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
LOL! Kirk Johnson (talk) 07:45, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
I'd love to see a counter-counter-argument to that counter-argument at tektonics.org. - LucidFox (talk) 17:17, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
- Here it is: "The article claims that our objective intuitive morality shows that homosexuality is evil, and a very bad kind of evil. I say they're full of shit." (See my user page.) LiberalOfAnUnknownVariant (talk) 21:50, 21 September 2012 (UTC)
- Yeah, I'd go with "full of shit" as a counter-argument too. Some points don't need addressing, you just need to demonstrate clearly that they weren't even a counter-argument to begin with, which is usually far easier than refutation - hence a colour scheme can come in handy.
d hominem
17:31, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
- Yeah, I'd go with "full of shit" as a counter-argument too. Some points don't need addressing, you just need to demonstrate clearly that they weren't even a counter-argument to begin with, which is usually far easier than refutation - hence a colour scheme can come in handy.
This text was used almost word for word on an episode of the "West Wing". Does anyone know which came first? VOXHUMANA 03:13, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
- The West Wing came second.
gnostic
06:21, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
Funniest[edit]
This is the funniest article on RationalWiki, simply because the subject is utterly hilarious. Any other candidates? --159.65.94.189 (talk) 03:15, 4 March 2018 (UTC)
Own-able Canadians[edit]
These. Anna Livia (talk) 18:04, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
Was there any response from dear Laura? — Unsigned, by: 5.128.33.17 / talk / contribs