|
Nominations and Campaigning for the 2024 RationalWiki Moderator Election are now open |
What on Earth were you thinking?
I have since stopped caring about that.
You attacked another user for no reason two days ago and now you "stopped caring about it"? Please explain yourself. ħuman
01:24, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
Wow. Just as I was beginning to miss Human, he comes up with a perfect reason why most people don't.
Human, please learn that you don't need to sign your comments on LQT pages. You're not that dim.
My reply was aimed at you turning up with a comment like "Please explain yourself" when you've done fuck all on the site in recent times. You're the one who should be explaining yourself. Stop bothering people about things you personally don't like.
I routinely sign wiki comments with them. Liquid threads is the problem, not my habit. ħuman 01:46, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
You're so right. Only the other day I found myself stuffing hay into my car's petrol tank because we always used to feed horses to pull carriages. You can imagine my embarrassment!
SR, liquid threads is a disaster. It does not integrate with MW software, it's in beta, so fuck off. Now, is Armondikov going to answer my simple question or are the trolls going to bury this in stupidity? ħuman 01:55, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
Ah - so it's LQT's fault that you can't learn how to use it. I hadn't realised stupidity could be transmitted through wiki software.
I agree with Huw. LT is like emulating a good apple product in windoze. It haz it's place, (and I do not think RW is that place), and werks like the people who do like it to werk. But over all it's clunky and annoying. C®ackeЯ C®ackeЯ C®ackeЯ C®ackeЯ C®ackeЯ C®ackeЯ (Just for good measure). (Oh, I also don't like that there is no edit summary...I do some of mine best werk there)
SR, this has nothing to do with you, I asked Armondikov a reasonable question. Please mind your own business. ħuman 01:48, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
I'm so terribly sorry. There I was assuming that because you posted in a publicly-viewable, publicly-editable forum, anybody could respond. If only there was some way in which you could communicate privately with someone when you only wanted responses from that person? Like clicking the "Email this user" button!
But your response was pointless. I asked Armondikov a simple question, that you can't answer, obviously. ħuman 01:57, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
You decided to keep an argument going that had been over for some time and make it ADK's problem. I decided to make it your problem instead. What is your justification for demanding an answer from ADK?
SR, fuck off. I asked A. a question. You have nothing to contribute besides being a weird sort of asshole. I still await A.'s answer. Not your tripe. ħuman 02:03, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
As Blue already commented, the answer is obvious. Your deliberate ignorance is an insult to the rest of us. All you are doing is perpetuating an argument that had finished of its own accord. Why are you doing that, Human? Why? What is your motivation for causing deliberate strife? What is your justification for - in your own words - "demanding" answers? To give you a taste of your own medicine: your answers are required NOW.
But he's such a cute little troll! I will hug him and pet him and squeeze him, and I will call him George.
I don't agree with Human regarding the substance of this dispute, but honestly, whether he signs his LQT posts twice or not is rather irrelevant. --(((Zack Martin)))™ 02:51, 8 May 2011 (UTC) --(((Zack Martin)))™ 02:51, 8 May 2011 (UTC) --(((Zack Martin)))™ 02:51, 8 May 2011 (UTC) --(((Zack Martin)))™ 02:51, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
Mmm. Yes. Can't disagree, but I consider it my responsibility as a knowledgeable person to pass on any little bits of knowledge that others don't have. Since Human evidently didn't have the knowledge about not needing to sign LQT posts, I gave it to him. He then chose to pursue a rather wet path by ignoring the advice. That's entirely his decision, and one that I'm sure we all know how to interpret.