This is happening sunday

Jump to: navigation, search

Seth Peck (talk)15:41, 10 October 2012

Oh excellent. A bunch of non-atheists telling a bunch of Christians what Asthies "really think" and why it does and does not matter!

It's as bad as the other side watering down religion to make their point. sighs.

If they were honest, they would have real live atheists stand up there and say "bullocks. Deal with *this*, and not the straw man.

Green mowse.pngGodotCalibrated! let the voting begin!15:36, 11 October 2012

Asthies? Really?

Scarlet A.pngnarchistModerator15:45, 11 October 2012

Oh give her a break, you know typing isn't her strong point. Anyway, it should be bollocks not bullocks.

Redchuck.gif ГенгисpillagingModerator15:53, 11 October 2012

Asthie -> Atheist + Aspie. Who are probably fascists.

ТyGO AWAY15:57, 11 October 2012

Yes, it was supposed to be Atheist. I didn't see the red squiggles, since i was on my phone. so there ;-) (and yes, i can't see errors unless there is a red squiggle. blame my eyes, or blame being premature, or what ever the newest theory on why dyslexics don't read / see letter arrangement well.

Green mowse.pngGodotCalibrated! let the voting begin!17:04, 11 October 2012

Oh, that's fine. I thought it was intentional.

Scarlet A.pngpostateModerator17:49, 11 October 2012

LOL. nope. not clever enough to make such word play.

Green mowse.pngGodotCalibrated! let the voting begin!17:58, 11 October 2012
  1. We shouldn’t attack theology or religion because Godot is an accommodationist and doesn’t like us to attack theology or religion because we aren’t experts in theology or religion and don’t understand things properly.
  2. We should attack the patriarchy, the rape culture etc because Godot is a feminist and does like us to attack those subjects because Godot and the rest of us know enough to attack male chauvinism. Incidentally Godot feels her qualifications in Religious studies qualify her to attack male chauvinism generally but I’m not qualified to attack Christianity in Godot’s opinion.

Can we dissect racism without being racists? Can we dissect pseudoscience, faith healing woo generally, all those subjects that we dissect without believing it all or at least studying whichever silly idea we dissect for very many years? Let’s get some consistency. Proxima Centauri (talk) 17:10, 11 October 2012 (UTC)

Proxima Centauri (talk)17:10, 11 October 2012

Dear Proxima Centauri,

Please stop being a petty, backbiting, grudgeful asshole.


The rest of RationalWiki

Star of David.png Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.17:24, 11 October 2012