There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with ![]() ![]() |
User talk:Aile Dhoo
Welcome to RationalWiki, Aile Dhoo![edit]
Please see our guide for newcomers and our community standards.
If you are interested in contributing, please read what our articles are intended to be.
You can tell us how you found RationalWiki here.--ZooGuard (talk) 11:08, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
I look forward to make use. By the way: how do I get my statements to go in like the following fashion downwards instead of going downwards? --Aile Dhoo (talk) 18:39, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
- I am not sure what you are asking about. If you mean paragraph breaks, they are done by two consecutive new lines. If you mean indents in discussion, they are done by starting a new line with one or more colons (each one adds an indentation level). You can look at Help:Contents for more explanations of wiki-editing.--ZooGuard (talk) 19:05, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
Ron Paul Edit[edit]
Hi, I would like to know why you have undone my revision. I have created a discussion here: http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Talk:Ron_Paul#False_allegations_of_double_billing --68.2.64.15 (talk) 07:44, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
- You haven't "created a discussion" - you've written a justification. I don't know squat about Murkan politics but the artcle looks OK to me. Scream!! (talk) 07:48, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
- I would like to know Aile Dhoo's objection to my justification for the removal of false information.--68.2.64.15 (talk) 07:51, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
Probably not dangerously unbalanced[edit]
RW:SYSOP - David Gerard (talk) 13:04, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
- Thank you. :)
Chiro[edit]
Generally speaking, one shouldn't be citing Chiro journals, as the level of evidence is not that good. The chiro concept of subluxation is not medically accepted. Bongolian (talk) 09:05, 31 January 2016 (UTC)