There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff – we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity.
If everyone who saw this today donated $5, we would meet our goal for 2021.
| Fighting pseudoscience isn't free.|
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $20 or whatever you can today with !
Moving might not be the best way to archive. Have I introduced you to my friend pibot yet? ħuman 07:05, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
I'm not sure if I'm helping or getting in the way
What the fuck is happening
and why in the hell is this guy editing faster than Kendoll on meth? |₹Λ¥$€₦₦ But does planting trees help bring people to Christ? 03:52, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
- This asshole is attempting to dox various users. --transResident Transformers fanform! 03:53, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
- Ah, OK. |₹Λ¥$€₦₦ These abilities - and the charts for them - could deep-throat a sperm whale. 03:55, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
- Never mind ... I'm confused. Not a surprise, I suppose. MarmotHead (talk) 15:25, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
Signature prone to misunderstanding
Are you aware that the probably most familiar meaning of "transfan" is something quite different from "fan of the Transformers"? For that reason, your sig strikes me as slightly awkward, and I misunderstood it at first – until I checked your user page, that is. Especially considering that LGBT issues form an important topic for RW, I don't think I'm the only one who was confused by your sig; I mean it's not a far-fetched interpretation. Transfans of that other type (at least the cis men among them) are a controversial issue, after all. Just thought you'd appreciate being pointed this out. --220.127.116.11 (talk) 21:21, 20 December 2015 (UTC)