User talk:Chris Fanshaw

Isn't that AAAAA stuff done to death on Uncyclopedia? Totnesmartin 18:58, 26 July 2008 (EDT)

Could be. Don't go there often. They're such silly people. But it's a classic. But perhaps there's some more, I dunno, edgy and current way you prefer being vandalized? Hi, my name is Christopher St. John Belfry Featherstonhaugh, and I am here to vandalize. 19:41, 26 July 2008 (EDT)

Your welcome to RationalWiki is lukewarm at best, Chris Fanshaw. This observation is due to the nature of your initial edits. Pull up a goat and try not to make trouble. We realize it is possible that you do not understand the nature of the site or our objectives. Please see our guide for newcomers and our community standards to clarify things for you. If you're still interested in contributing, please see what our articles are intended to be.

AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHwelcomeHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH -- Gen. S.T. Shrink ^{That's what she said.} 18:59, 26 July 2008 (EDT)

Oh hai. You're doing it wrong, you know. That should've been "AAAAAAA!" Hi, my name is Christopher St. John Belfry Featherstonhaugh, and I am here to vandalize. 19:41, 26 July 2008 (EDT)

Oh, please forgive me. AAAAAAAAAAAwelcomeAAAAAAAAAA -- Gen. S.T. Shrink ^{That's what she said.} 19:44, 26 July 2008 (EDT)

/facepalm --Hi, my name is Christopher St. John Belfry Featherstonhaugh, and I am here to vandalize. 20:07, 26 July 2008 (EDT)

OK...

Who are you? ~ Gloom_{(is never asleep)} 19:47, 26 July 2008 (EDT)

I see Mr Featherwhatever was moved to the vandal group. Since he seems both willing and able to talk (How unusual!), maybe we should risk moving him out for the time being? --AKjeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 19:50, 26 July 2008 (EDT)

Unless it's just you indulging in your secret, but yet well-known desires for vandalism, of course. --AKjeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 19:54, 26 July 2008 (EDT)

Oh yes, I am insatiable in vandalism. I don't know who this CSJBFaIahtv person is, though. It sounds like a regular user being silly, to me. ~ Gloom_{(is never asleep)} 19:58, 26 July 2008 (EDT)

Exactly. And who is the master/mistress/supreme thing/supreme ? of silliness here, eh? --AKjeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 20:00, 26 July 2008 (EDT)

Either "Chaos!" or "Gloom", I should imagine... ~ Gloom_{(is never asleep)} 20:03, 26 July 2008 (EDT)

Indeed. --AKjeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 20:08, 26 July 2008 (EDT)

Who am I? Doesn't matter. We are legion. Hi, my name is Christopher St. John Belfry Featherstonhaugh, and I am here to vandalize. 20:07, 26 July 2008 (EDT)

I apologize for the premature labeling. "Chris" signed up at the same time and same name structure as "Amanda" (I think that was the name) who actually did wandelize, and I guess I jumped the gun. Sorry! --Arcan ¡ollǝɥ 20:08, 26 July 2008 (EDT)

This one did a bit of wandalizing too, so it was probably well-founded enough. --AKjeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 20:10, 26 July 2008 (EDT)

So much more so for the "we are legion" thing above - could be an wp:Anonymous_(group). --AKjeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 20:20, 26 July 2008 (EDT)

Expect us. --Chris Fanshaw 20:29, 26 July 2008 (EDT)

You can edit now.

If you want this to continue, be a good boy. Talk. -- Gen. S.T. Shrink ^{That's what she said.} 19:58, 26 July 2008 (EDT)

Oh yes, I forgot to mention that I paroled you. ~ Gloom_{(is never asleep)} 20:00, 26 July 2008 (EDT)

DO you always do that? -- Gen. S.T. Shrink ^{That's what she said.} 20:01, 26 July 2008 (EDT)

?

Do what? ~ Gloom_{(is never asleep)} 20:04, 26 July 2008 (EDT)

Remember when you wrote stealing the fire of others welcomes? -- Gen. S.T. Shrink ^{That's what she said.} 20:06, 26 July 2008 (EDT)

Yeth. ~ Gloom_{(is never asleep)} 20:09, 26 July 2008 (EDT)

Can't promise that. Hi, my name is Christopher St. John Belfry Featherstonhaugh, and I am here to vandalize. 20:07, 26 July 2008 (EDT)

Tommy Gorman

I'm almost afraid to ask, but - so, what is your position on Tommy Gorman? --AKjeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 06:05, 27 July 2008 (EDT)

Tommy Gorman Tommy Gorman ling Tommy Gorman is the cancer that is killing /b/ my name is Tommy Gorman signed Tommy Gorman. Chris Fanshaw 08:46, 27 July 2008 (EDT)

Talk sense, or I shall coat you in flour. Hmmmm... delicious flour... ~ Gloom_{(is never asleep)} 08:54, 27 July 2008 (EDT)

Tommy Gorman = ex-sci from SF who threatened to beat up an Anon at a protest in Washington because Tory Christman, another ex-sci, got butthurt over something that would take at least 100 years to explain. Chris Fanshaw 08:59, 27 July 2008 (EDT)

Not enough sense; flour-coating commences... ~ Gloom_{(is never asleep)} 09:02, 27 July 2008 (EDT)

OK. Goes like this: Enturb forums. Big site for anti-Scientology protests. Two groups: Anonymous & Old Guard, people who have protested against Scientology for over 9000 years and accomplished squat. Still, OG run around playing high and mighty and try to run Enturb. Anonymous does not want. Drama ensues. Also at Enturb is Thunderdome. Forum where anything goes. Don't go if you can't take it. Tory Christman, little 50-year lady from OG goes to TD and gets butthurt. Phones other OG Tommy Gorman Tommy Gorman (big thug, IQ 6) and goes "BAAAAAAWWWWWW they threatened to kill me!" Next protest in DC, Tommy Gorman Tommy Gorman threatens to beat up Anon member who said stuff to Tory in TD. More drama on Enturb. Now Anonymous DOES NOT WANT Tory and Tommy Gorman Tommy Gorman. Clear? Chris Fanshaw 09:13, 27 July 2008 (EDT)

Vaguely. I can't say I approve of Anonymous. You still haven't said who you are, either. ~ Gloom_{(is never asleep)} 09:17, 27 July 2008 (EDT)

Good for you. I'd be worried if you approved of us. And you haven't really grasped this whole 'being anonymous' concept yet, have you? Chris Fanshaw 09:20, 27 July 2008 (EDT)

No one person can be anonymous. It seems highly likely to me that you are a sock of a regular user. ~ Gloom_{(is never asleep)} 09:26, 27 July 2008 (EDT)

NO U! Chris Fanshaw 09:27, 27 July 2008 (EDT)

I fink you are user:Hooman. Or possible Susan Bloodyface Garlick. ~ Gloom_{(is never asleep)} 09:30, 27 July 2008 (EDT)

O RLY? I think I'm you. Chris Fanshaw 09:31, 27 July 2008 (EDT)

I think you are some kind of ninja. Perhaps on Conservapedia. ~ Gloom_{(is never asleep)} 09:32, 27 July 2008 (EDT)

No, I'm a pirate. Or at least I was in June. This month I'm a spai. ::sneaky:: Chris Fanshaw 09:34, 27 July 2008 (EDT)

Your lolspeak is deficient. You need more practiss. ~ Gloom_{(is never asleep)} 09:36, 27 July 2008 (EDT)

Bah lolcat. That was ours before it went mainstream. Caturday 4evah! Chris Fanshaw 09:42, 27 July 2008 (EDT)

That was whose? ~ Gloom_{(is never asleep)} 09:47, 27 July 2008 (EDT)

Ours. Anon's. /b/. Chris Fanshaw 09:49, 27 July 2008 (EDT)

Nah. Anonymous can't own things, you know. Silly... uh... Fanshaw. ~ Gloom_{(is never asleep)} 09:52, 27 July 2008 (EDT)

We own the Internets. Lurk moar. Chris Fanshaw 09:54, 27 July 2008 (EDT)

You own nothing! Bwahaha!

The internet is owned by thetans, obviously. ~ Gloom_{(is never asleep)} 09:59, 27 July 2008 (EDT)

Do you always go on like this? You will find this relevant to your interests. Chris Fanshaw 10:27, 27 July 2008 (EDT)

1. Yes, I do.
2. Is that all you've got? Yawn. Seen it before, not funny.
3. I have no interests, except in stealing your delicious sandwich. ~ Gloom_{(is never asleep)} 10:40, 27 July 2008 (EDT)

If he frequents /b/, I don't think you'd want to see what else he's "got". --AKjeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 10:47, 27 July 2008 (EDT)

^This. Chris Fanshaw 10:53, 27 July 2008 (EDT)

Amen to that AK.   ^Contribs_Talk 10:56, 27 July 2008 (EDT)

And what, pray tell, is "/b/"? ~ Gloom_{(is never asleep)} 10:58, 27 July 2008 (EDT)

Ohh. A newfag. How delicious. You know what a *chan is? Chris Fanshaw 11:00, 27 July 2008 (EDT)

A message board frequented by bored eleven-year-olds? ~ Gloom_{(is never asleep)} 11:03, 27 July 2008 (EDT)

Be gentle with him Mr Featherstonhaugh.   ^Contribs_Talk 11:06, 27 July 2008 (EDT)

Picture board. Same difference. And damn your pronouns. ~ Gloom_{(is never asleep)} 11:15, 27 July 2008 (EDT)

/b/ is the part of a *chan where we post pictures that make you wish clawing your eyes out could make you unsee them. It is the heart and soul of Anonymous. Unfortunately, most of the *chans are down right now due due to some epic faggotry, otherwise you could go see for yourself. Chris Fanshaw 11:09, 27 July 2008 (EDT)

I can summon very little enthusiasm for such an excursion. It sounds like institutionalized grawpspamming to me. I want no part in it *sweeps cape over self* *disappears* ~ Gloom_{(is never asleep)} 11:15, 27 July 2008 (EDT)

Wise choice is wise. Chris Fanshaw 11:19, 27 July 2008 (EDT)

So it is - what happened?   ^Contribs_Talk 11:13, 27 July 2008 (EDT)

Bunch of retards throught it'd be epic to hit all the *chans+ED at the same time. Apparently it's from anontalk.com. Chris Fanshaw 11:19, 27 July 2008 (EDT)

Twasn't Cruise's friends then?   ^Contribs_Talk 11:24, 27 July 2008 (EDT)

Doubt it. Some Old Guards think so but they see OSA everywhere. More likely just the usual shit. Don't see what in it for the $cis anyway. Not like Chanology has much to do with the *chans anymore. Chris Fanshaw 11:31, 27 July 2008 (EDT)

Anonymous is.   ^Contribs_Talk 09:23, 27 July 2008 (EDT)

Anonymous is not.   ^Contribs_Talk 09:24, 27 July 2008 (EDT)

Anonymous. Chris Fanshaw 09:27, 27 July 2008 (EDT)

I'm really a 6ft 4in Rugby player living in Neath. (For all you know)   ^Contribs_Talk 09:32, 27 July 2008 (EDT)

Childish word usage...

While we are pretty freewheeling with our language use here, we tend to look down on the use of "fag" and "retard" as insulting terms (probably since quite a few of us are one or both). Please try to clean up your act a bit... ħuman 16:11, 27 July 2008 (EDT)

I could be both too. Would that make it OK? Chris Fanshaw 16:14, 27 July 2008 (EDT)

Probably not as often as you seem to use them. Try being more imaginative? ħuman 16:44, 27 July 2008 (EDT)

Um. Are you sure asking him to be 'imaginative' is a good idea? --AKjeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 16:48, 27 July 2008 (EDT)

Clearance sale!!! Clearance sale!!!

Now on sale, we are offering reduced prices on Sysopship, and you, my good sir, have been selected to recieve a FREE!!! sysopship!! Congratulations, here is your mop and bucket, only $15.99, or your soul to RW! What a shame! Congratulations!!! ĵ₳¥ášÇ♠ʘ My computer has two mowses!

In addition, you also recieve access to the Sysop Guide!!! congratulations! ĵ₳¥ášÇ♠ʘ My computer has two mowses!

Are you sure that was wise? Chris Fanshaw 23:22, 8 February 2009 (EST)

Might not be, but... meh. Enjoy your new powarz! ĵ₳¥ášÇ♠ʘ My computer has two mowses!

We specialize in unwise demotions. My condolences. ħuman 23:31, 8 February 2009 (EST)

Careful, Huw—those who specialize too much find their jobs replaced by robots : ) Radioactive afikomen ^{Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.} 23:41, 8 February 2009 (EST)

So true, so true. Luckily I don't specialize in this particular fetish, Jacob. ħuman 23:50, 8 February 2009 (EST)

Well fellows, I think I have done all the damage I can tonight. What with demoting an editor, getting into a verbal spat, and burning down a dumpster while stoned into oblivion, I think I had a very full night. See y'all later. ĵ₳¥ášÇ♠ʘ My computer has two mowses!

Wait, the leftovers are just ready for the eating! ħuman 23:50, 8 February 2009 (EST)