User talk:Correcttherecord

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search

I am representing Viharo in this deletion request, and I am here to correct some gross inaccuracies, many of them which are intentionally misleading and deceptive in both the article and in a few of the claims here. Viharo has not "doxed" anyone, but rather used public information available on the internet so as to attempt to halt extreme harassment from that individual, as well as a number of other internet users. Viharo has, however, filed a complaint with the FBI regarding an individual who does and has edited RationalWIki. All Viharo has done in the past four years is blog about each instance of recorded harassment, which is his right to do so and which he does in a responsible manner. If there are inaccuracies on Wikipedia, We Have a Problem, those will be removed as long as a reasonable claim or counter-argument can be made. I also protest the inference that Viharo is a "predator" when all of his actions are defensive and can easily be proved as such. Historically, Viharo has sought recourse through the rationalwiki platform, and just faced harassment and consistent banning or blocking. Maybe lets all try this again? I am not here to make legal threats. Will I be allowed to proceed? Please advise as to where an when, thank you. Correcttherecord (talk) 14:33, 12 April 2018 (UTC)

You filed an FBI report about a person for editing Rationalwiki? LOL. You claimed you filed this YEARS ago. And NOTHING happened. Ever wonder why? The FBI are too busy catching real life terrorists, rapists and murderers. Nobody gives a shit about your Rationalwiki article that factually documents your pseudoscience beliefs. Debunking spiritualism (talk) 19:29, 12 April 2018 (UTC)

Meh[edit]

New logo large.png Meh. You signing up for a RationalWiki account doesn't really move us one way or the other, Correcttherecord.

This is probably because we're getting bored of lame attempts at trolling our site and/or obvious sockpuppetry. Maybe you should try mixing things up a little or try taking a walk outside.

We realize that it is possible that you think your activity here is really important, so we'll do our best to tolerate it. But don't expect us to get too excited.

Our Newcomers' Guide may help clarify things for you.

π”Šπ”¬π”žπ”±-π”ˆπ”ͺ𝔭𝔒𝔯𝔬𝔯 𝔅𝔦𝔀𝔰 (𝔴𝔬𝔯𝔑𝔰 𝔬𝔣 𝔴𝔦𝔰𝔑𝔬π”ͺ/π”žπ” π”₯𝔦𝔒𝔳𝔒π”ͺ𝔒𝔫𝔱𝔰) 14:38, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
I'm just here seeking recourse and the correction of gross inaccuracies, many of which are intentional, on a RationalWiki article. Will you allow me a pathway to recourse? Correcttherecord (talk) 14:49, 12 April 2018 (UTC)

@GrammerCommie- I did not make any legal threats against RationalWiki foundation - why was I blocked?[edit]

Comrade GC (talk)

I've been blocked from seeking recourse to gross inaccuracies on the article, specifically because it says I made a legal threat. I did not make any legal threat, nor am I here to make a legal threat, I am here to find a pathway to recourse and to correct inaccuracies in the Rome Viharo article on RationalWiki.

In case there is any confusion: rome viharo DID file a criminal complaint with the FBI against an individual, not RationalWiki, who is believed to edit here, but that is neither a legal threat or lawsuit threat, nor is it directed at RationalWiki.

Am I not allowed a pathway to recourse?

Please advise, thank you.

Correcttherecord (talk) 18:52, 12 April 2018 (UTC)

You threatened to sick the FBI on us. And given the FBI is a law enforcement agency, any threat involving them is by definition a legal threat. ☭Comrade GC☭Ministry of Praise 21:35, 12 April 2018 (UTC)

@Spud[edit]

Spud (talk)

I posted the request to the saloon bar, per your suggestion of posting it in the right place on Rome Viharo's talk section, but this is not something I am permitted to do. Now, I've been blocked because it is claimed I've made a legal threat, yet I've made no legal threat and made it very clear I am not here to make legal threats, but to find a path to recourse and hopefully reconciliation. Please advise. Correcttherecord (talk) 18:58, 12 April 2018 (UTC)

You had your chance to explain what inaccuracies you think there are on article; instead you wasted time posting misinformation, nonsense about the FBI as part of your victim complex. No one is interested in your crybaby sob story here. It's as if you admit there are no inaccuracies because you've failed to list them nor provide any refutation.Agent47 (talk) 19:17, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
I just contacted the FBI, they said the article on Rome Viharo at Rationalwiki was 100% factual and they love it. Debunking spiritualism (talk) 19:30, 12 April 2018 (UTC)