User talk:I think outside the box
|
Your welcome to RationalWiki is lukewarm at best, I think outside the box.
This observation is due to the nature of your initial edits. Pull up a goat and try not to make trouble. We realize it is possible that you do not understand the nature of the site or our objectives. Please see our guide for newcomers and our community standards to clarify things for you. If you're still interested in contributing, please see what our articles are intended to be. |
-DïämöńđDïsc1 (talk) 02:09, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
- Thank you! I think outside the box (talk) 02:10, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
- No problem. How are you enjoying RationalWiki?-DïämöńđDïsc1 (talk) 02:11, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
- I've followed it for years. It used to be funny to vandalize Conservapedia, but now I wonder if they are right about things. I think outside the box (talk) 02:16, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
- Why?-DïämöńđDïsc1 (talk) 02:17, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
- I started going to a Baptist Church with my girlfriend, and oddly enough they make a lot of sense. They've had answers to all of my questions. I think outside the box (talk) 02:19, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
- Have you read parts of the Bible?-DïämöńđDïsc1 (talk) 02:25, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
- I've been going to a Bible study, and they're in Matthew right now. I think outside the box (talk) 02:28, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
- If it really was Bible study, they'd at least teach you the Q gospel, without that it's just Bible indoctrination. Bongolian (talk) 04:23, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
- I've been going to a Bible study, and they're in Matthew right now. I think outside the box (talk) 02:28, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
- Have you read parts of the Bible?-DïämöńđDïsc1 (talk) 02:25, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
- I started going to a Baptist Church with my girlfriend, and oddly enough they make a lot of sense. They've had answers to all of my questions. I think outside the box (talk) 02:19, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
- Why?-DïämöńđDïsc1 (talk) 02:17, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
- I've followed it for years. It used to be funny to vandalize Conservapedia, but now I wonder if they are right about things. I think outside the box (talk) 02:16, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
- No problem. How are you enjoying RationalWiki?-DïämöńđDïsc1 (talk) 02:11, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
- Thank you! I think outside the box (talk) 02:10, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
I've also read the part where homosexuality is an abomination. I think outside the box (talk) 02:31, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
- Regardless of how you think, homosexuals are still people and deserve to be treated as such. With respect.-DïämöńđDïsc1 (talk) 02:33, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
- What if all people don't deserve respect? Since we speak of WWII... does Adolph Hitler deserve respect? Do mass murderers deserve respect? Where do we draw the line? I think outside the box (talk) 02:37, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
- What if you meet a homosexual who has committed no crime? Just because that person is homosexual, does that mean that person should burn in hell forever?-DïämöńđDïsc1 (talk) 02:42, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
- What if you meet a person attracted to children who has committed no crime? Just because that person is a pedophile, should that person be shunned by society? I think outside the box (talk) 02:45, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
- No, pedophiles should not be shunned by society. Just like people with Down Syndrome, they have a condition which they cannot fix, and must live with.
- You're right that not all people deserve respect. Hitler doesn't, because he was responsible for the deaths of millions of people. People who put their penises inside of other men's butts doesn't mean you should disrespect them.
- On a side note, know that you are considering a movement that thinks people deserve respect/no respect based on a 3000 year old book that was written by various people who were supposedly influenced by God. Just a thought. PBfreespace (talk) 03:16, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
-DïämöńđDïsc1 (talk) 03:22, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
- What if you meet a person attracted to children who has committed no crime? Just because that person is a pedophile, should that person be shunned by society? I think outside the box (talk) 02:45, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
- What if you meet a homosexual who has committed no crime? Just because that person is homosexual, does that mean that person should burn in hell forever?-DïämöńđDïsc1 (talk) 02:42, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
- What if all people don't deserve respect? Since we speak of WWII... does Adolph Hitler deserve respect? Do mass murderers deserve respect? Where do we draw the line? I think outside the box (talk) 02:37, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
There's a fucking difference between Socratic discussion and continually asking questions[edit]
Namely that Socratic discourses are teaching and lead the questionee to a conclusion -- and the other is just a waffling, delaying tactic to avoid every holding any beliefs whatsoever. FuzzyCatPotato of the Canadian Blimps (talk/stalk) 04:50, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
The undue rustling of jimmies[edit]
Any idea why this lovely BoN appears to be trying to sign his post as you? Reverend Black Percy (talk) 10:02, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Now now Percy, this rabbit hole isn't for you. Who made the user page in the first place? I wouldn't know ;) I have so many nice friends on here. He Hates Written work. Very Underrated. — Unsigned, by: 213.48.79.188 / talk / contribs
Not him!! I thought he was a nice dude! guess he wasn't :( Arisbochsock 213.48.79.188 (talk)